The IHF Proposes a Pan American Split (Part 2): The Curious Politics Behind the Proposal
In Part 1, I outlined the IHF’s proposal to split the Pan American Federation into two separate federations. In Part 2, I look at the overall merits of the proposal, the curious politics behind it, and a looming high stakes vote at the IHF Congress in Turkey.
Not a Perfect Deal, but One that Makes Sense
As discussed in Part 1, there’s a lot of pros and cons to the IHF proposal to split the Pan American Handball Federation (PHF) in two. Personally, I took some offense to the lack of World Championship qualification slots. 1 slot only for Youth and Jr Championships. And, essentially half a slot for Sr. Championships. While it may reflect the current competitive status of North American/Caribbean Handball it’s still quite a snub. But, once I got over the snub and weighed the cost savings and the opportunity to create truly regional competitions I started to warm to the proposal.
And, the more I’ve thought about it the more I’ve warmed up to it. The reality is that it just doesn’t make a whole lot of sense for all that travel back and forth across the equator. All that money spent paying airlines will be roughly halved… forever. Those costs are different for each nation, but make no mistake there’s some real big savings over time. And, there are just too many Pan American events right now that are for all practical purposes simply South American events. The recently completed Women’s Club Championships are a prime example: 8 clubs- all from South America.
I think the New York City Team Handball Club Men’s team is only side from the North that has ever participated in a club championship And, yes club handball is not very well developed in the North, but bet your bottom dollar, if this championship was ever staged in the North, Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico and Cuba would be far more likely to attend. And, then maybe only one team from Argentina and Brazil would make the trip up north.
And, this is not likely to ever change in a Federation that spans from Greenland in the north to Tierra Del Fuego in the south. Club Championships, Jr and Youth Championships will continue to have limited participation due to travel costs. Only Sr Championships will be truly North/South affairs.
Whereas, if you split the federations there’s a real chance that the North will see legitimate growth in participation to all those events. Ideally, it could turn into handball’s version of the FIFA CONCACAF. Not the strongest Federation, but a competitive one with good participation in all events. And, perhaps even the South will see growth with the 5 primary nations (Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Chile) focusing on and encouraging growth in Peru, Ecuador, Bolivia, Colombia, Venezuela and Central America. In theory, they could create a legitimate handball CONMEBOL.
And, I’m not even factoring in the contentious issues that roiled the Federation 10 years ago. Major issues that were resolved with devastating impacts to Canada and Greenland. Things have been more agreeable the past few years and it’s nice to see some championship events coming north for a change. But, with a split? Well, those issues would never rise to the fore again because the disagreeing nations would be in separate federations.
But, a Deal that’s Being Unanimously Rejected?
Well, while I may have warmed to the idea of two federations, the PHF nations soundly rejected the proposal at an Extraordinary Congress held on 7 October. As stated on the PHF website:
- Se trató la propuesta presentada por el Presidente de la IHF de dividir al Continente Americano en dos Federaciones (Norte y Sur) y la misma no contó con ninguna adhesión positiva.
Or, in Google Translate : “The proposal presented by the President of the IHF to divide the American Continent in two Federations (North and South) was discussed and it did not have any positive adhesion.”
As to why it was rejected, no rationale has been provided. Speculation on my part, but I would surmise that many nations are resistant to change or are concerned with qualification slots. Regardless, while the proposal merited only one sentence, this proposal was the reason why a PHF Extraordinary Congress was held and it wasn’t just discussed, it was discussed at length.
It surely would have been interesting to have been a fly on the wall of that meeting, but I’ve heard next to nothing (on or off the record) as to what was discussed. Nobody’s talking and for something like this with major potential repercussions that is a bit surprising. Yes, the PHF appears to have quite a bit more discipline then the leaky Trump White House.
The Curious History and Politics Behind the Proposal
What’s really curious about this proposal is that it was initiated by the IHF. This in many respects would be sort of like the European Union proposing to Spain that it split into 2 countries, Spain and Catalonia. As an organization it’s fairly easy to see it from the PHF perspective: “Mind your own business, would ya? If we want to split the PHF, we’ll figure out that ourselves and then we will put forward a proposal to the IHF for consideration.”
And, what makes things curiouser and curiouser? A similar proposal was submitted by the U.S. back in 2009 and it was rejected by the IHF. Former USA Team Handball Board President, Dieter Esch, later voiced his displeasure with IHF President Moustafa’s lack of support to his proposed breakaway federation. Indeed, it was a factor in Esch’s decision to step down and discontinue his generous financial support to USA Team Handball. And, now Dr. Moustafa is taking up the mantle for a North American Federation? And, USA Team Handball is rejecting the proposal?
It should have you scratching your head. But, then again, USA Team Handball has entirely different leadership now and having known USA Team Handball CEO, Mike Cavanaugh, for around 30 years, he’s not one to prone to rock the boat unless it is absolutely necessary.
Additionally, as I discussed in my interview with Handball de Primera, it’s possible that some nations in the PHF were/are reluctant to speak out openly, out of fear of future repercussions should the proposal not come to fruition. For sure, it would be awkward to attend future PHF meetings after having previously voiced support for leaving the PHF. And, it would only be natural for future issues and decisions to be weighed negatively against the “traitor” in their midst. Yes, often it is better to be quiet and tactical in such a situation. But, to be honest I’ve got little insight as to what the nations are thinking and this is clearly speculation on my part.
The Way Ahead: Drama and High Stakes in Turkey?
Well, you might think that this issue is over. After all, the PHF nations unanimously rejected the proposal. The IHF wouldn’t force the PHF to split if they don’t want to? Right?
Well, apparently that’s not the case as the proposal is still on the agenda for upcoming IHF Congress in Antalya, Turkey on 11-12 November. And, you can even read the proposal which in a rare moment of transparency is readily available on the IHF Congress website. This wording is virtually identical to the IHF Council Meeting Minutes except for the omission of information regarding WC qualification slots (which I outlined in part 1).
So, assuming this proposal stays on the agenda, the IHF Congress will vote on the motion to split Pan America in two. For passage, the motion will require a 2/3 majority. This may seem like a steep hurdle, but President Moustafa who is running unopposed for his 5th term as IHF President generally knows how to count up the votes. The IHF 2013 Congress had 163 attendees and the 2015 IHF Congress had 139, so one could assume that the 2017 Congress will have similar attendance. Perhaps even more as additional nations have joined the IHF. Further, the IHF has been known to pay airfare and hotel for developing nations to attend, which often endears support from those representatives on key votes.
If there are 160 voting members, the measure would need to have 107 voting in support to beat the 53 voting against. And, one can do a whole lot of speculating as to where the votes might come from for either bloc. Key questions to be asked and answered in Turkey:
- How many nations will show up and how many are attending on the IHF’s dime?
- How strongly will the IHF President push this motion? Will he be content to let the Congress decide or will he see its non-passage as an affront to his leadership?
- How will the different continental federations discuss this proposal at their meetings prior to the IHF Congress? Michael Wiederer, the influential EHF President voiced his support for the proposal stating that he is in favor as it would help to strengthen handball in the economically important country of USA. How might other IHF Council members lobby their respective continents?
- Can the PHF member nations effectively lobby other nations with the rationale that this proposal shouldn’t be forced upon a continental federation? (i.e. The message being that your continent could be next)
- Are the PHF member nations truly united against this proposal or will some take the opportunity of a secret ballot to vote in favor?
- And will some renegade PHF nations even go further? Actually lobbying for the proposal in private or with a wink and a nod in a semi-private discussion in the hotel lobby or at a coffee break?
- What will USA Team Handball say or do? As this proposal is in part focused on U.S. development a few choice words in public and/or private could make a real difference.
Honestly, I don’t know the answers to any of these questions which makes the outcome all the more interesting. In another life, as a NATO Staff Officer I attended dozens of meetings with the flags around the table. With very few exceptions these meetings were snoozers with little doubt as what would be decided… because anything important had already been decided before the meeting.
But, this might very well indeed be the rare case where an International Meeting takes place with the outcome to a major issue in doubt. There might even be impassioned discussion at the Congress right before the vote takes place. Something rarely seen or heard. And this discussion should even be available for viewing on a live web stream on the IHF Congress web page. An unprecedented possibility that should have every handball fan in Pan America on the edge of their seat.
Yes, mark your calendars. 11 November 2017 could be the date that seals Pan America’s fate one way or the other.