About Christer Ahl


Website:
Christer Ahl has written 294 articles so far, you can find them below.


Embarrassing outcome for PanAmerica in Junior Championship

Iran and Algeria - levels above Canada and Venezuela

For the first time in a World Championship of any category, PanAmerica was entitled to have five participants in the recently concluded Men’s Junior event.  Perhaps some in the PanAmerican Federation felt some pride in this.  But as has typically happened in the past, whenever PanAmerica had more than the automatic allocation of two or three teams, the additional number only served to highlight to the handball world the weaknesses of the PanAmerican continent.

During many years now, we have been used to seeing Argentina and Brazil put in strong, or at least respectable, performances.  But rarely has another team managed to avoid getting a final ranking at the bottom.  This is also what happened to the other three PanAmerican participants.  Only the weakness of the team from Benin saved PanAmerica from occupying the last three places.  Now we saw Chile as 21st, Canada as 22nd and Venezuela as 24th.

 I am not saying that it is a surprise, because I had not expected much better.  The story of Canada’s truly amateur team has been reported here earlier.  And Venezuela had to fill in at the last moment, as a replacement for Uruguay, and their completely inexperienced team had no chance.  But it is really revealing that a continent with more than 30 member federations continues to be in a situation where it does not have more than two teams that are competitive internationally.

And to make it worse this time, Brazil and Argentina had their worst showing in many years.  After Argentina’s strong performance in the senior World Championship earlier this year, it is a bit surprising, and worrisome for the future, if the ‘under-21′ team cannot do better than a 20th place, ranking behind teams such as Iran, Algeria and Qatar.  Brazil managed to qualify for the 1/8-finals but finished in a modest 11th place.  By contrast, Tunisia and Egypt qualified for the bronze medal game, where the Tunisians turned out to be the strongest.

Clearly it is a disadvantage for most countries in PanAmerica that the caliber of play at the national level is too weak to provide strong development opportunities for the younger talents.  And the opportunities for continental events are very infrequent, moreover with the typical scenario of Argentina and Brazil being superior and the remaining teams finding it difficult to gain much useful experience.   Regrettably, it is going to be a very slow process before any change can be seen in this situation.  

The young European players have a much more favorable situation, both nationally and at the continental level.  The European Championships and qualifying events in the junior and youth categories are grueling and constitute a tough and beneficial preparation for those who qualify for a World Championship.  A wild idea would be to try to put together some kind of ‘non-European’ championship for the top 4-5 countries from each continent to gain some similar experience.  

However, when one sees the success of Tunisia and Egypt this time, these other continents may see little merit in such an idea, which in any event would be difficult to finance (although of course it would deserve the support of the IHF).  The North African countries and the Gulf States have an advantage financially, and they also have a closer proximity to Europe with better opportunities to develop players and team through more frequent interaction with the Europeans.  The risk is that PanAmerica will gradually fall further behind.

Junior World Championship lives up to expectations

Over the years, the IHF has tried two different approaches for the format of play following the preliminary groups.  It has been more common to create main round groups for the top three from each group, but the method that it being used this time, with a ‘knock-out’ competition, starting with1/8-finals after the groups, has also been tried before.  It is difficult to claim that one format is clearly the best one.  Knock-out matches create excitement for the spectators, but may be a bit capricious and unfair to the teams.   Main round groups are often very intriguing, but on some occasions they can be boring because the top positions are clear prior to the final matches.

One could say that it depends on how evenly matched the teams are on each occasion.  If one can identify four-five superior teams, the knock-out approach may have an edge.  But this time, it seems that the event is unusually full of strong and interesting teams, and it might be a shame that some of them will be out of contention after only one more game.   I will come back to the match-ups for the 1/8-finals and beyond, but first I want to offer some comments on the group play.

In Group A, not many may have realized that the very first match between Slovenia and Tunisia would be the group final.  But after the played it each other, they have gone on to dominate a strong group, leaving Norway and France to fight for the third place, and with Serbia somewhat surprisingly missing out on the knock-out stage.  Tunisia has been an interesting team to watch.  Yes, they often play a rough and undisciplined defense, but they display speed, technique and shooting power to make up for it.  Perhaps one expected more from France, given their well-known emphasis on finding and educating young talents to step in at the senior level.  But their win today against Slovenia may be the start of something, even if of course Slovenia had nothing to play for.

Denmark was not unexpectedly the clear winner in Group B, where the main fight was for places 2-5.  Greece started out in a nervous fashion, showing inexperience, but they recovered and came in second.  Algeria and Qatar were more consistent and played an interesting style of handball.  It will be nice to see how they fare against European opponents in the 1/8-finals.  Argentina must be seen as a disappointment, considering the strong showing of their senior team half a year ago.  Here they seemed a bit thin and ‘lost’ at times. On the final day, they had to sit and hope for a miracle in the other games, but this did not happen.

Germany moved calmly through their first four matches, but still had to handle a ‘group final’ against Egypt on the final day.  In the end, Germany overcame also this obstacle, and this meant that Egypt’s ‘unnecessary’ loss against Russia in the very first game moved them down to third place.  Brazil dutifully beat Benin and a technical but ‘thin’ Korean team to make it to the 1/8-finals, but they were not able to match up fully with the top three teams over 60 minutes. 

In Group D, it became clear that Portugal, Spain and Sweden were very evenly matched and in a class by themselves.  Spain won the group, and on the final day we saw Portugal narrowly beat Sweden and grab the second place.  But watch out for a Swedish team wanting revenge in their next match.  My earlier prediction regarding the fourth and final place in the knock-out competition turned out to be justified, when Iran surprisingly clearly beat a very pale Hungarian team.  It seems that Hungary was the most negative surprise of the event, notwithstanding the frustrations of Argentina and Serbia.

The tournament now continues with the 1/8-finals on Sunday.  The pairings are as follows and the sequence of the matches also indicates which winners will play each other in the quarter-finals and semi-finals:

Denmark-Norway,    Sweden-Russia;        Greece -Tunisia,  Spain-Brazil;;

Egypt-Portugal,   Slovenia- Qatar;         France-Algeria,  Germany -Iran

It seems that the group winners appropriately were rewarded by generally getting less scary opponents.             The ’2 against 3′ games are harder to predict.   I believe a lot in Tunisia but they get to face the home team;  Portugal may be in for a particularly tough time.  Sweden-Russia is probably the game that is the hardest one to predict, and France-Algeria is a traditional rivalry.  Looking beyond that round, it is intriguing to see that a final between Spain and Germany is theoretically possible.  But several other teams will try to ruin that, and my Scandinavian friends will surely complain if I do not mention them.  I have not been able to watch Slovenia but they seem to be tough, and how would it be if a tournament that started with Slovenia-Tunisia would finish with the same pairing!

Legal issues – EHF and HBL

In the interest of Fair Play

The European Handball Federation recently announced the introduction of a new internal legal system effective July 1.  Having seen reasons to criticize both procedural aspects and the results of the decision-making in some cases in recent years, I now congratulate the EHF to this necessary and important action.   When questions are raised about the adherence to correct procedures and about apparent mismatches between the nature of an illegal action and the severity of the punishment, then the entire system may lose its credibility.

The EHF legal system will now have a lower level with the name ‘EHF Court of Handball’ (replacing the misleading concept of Arbitration Tribunal).  This Court will deal primarily with competition-related cases (while the EHF Office will serve as first instance for administrative and transfer matters).  The exception regarding competition matters involves those events which are played in a tournament form, and where therefore decisions typically need to be taken from one day to the next, by the Disciplinary Commissions or Delegates responsible at the site.

An ‘EHF Court of Appeal’ constitutes the second level, for all matters (except during a European Championship tournament where a Jury plays that role).  In addition, there is an arbitration mechanism, ‘on top of’ or outside the two bodies just mentioned.  It is external to the EHF and completely independent, even though it has been established by the EHF Congress.   Very specific rules apply for the dispute resolution of this body, and in a sense it is, for EHF issues, an entity somewhat similar in nature to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).  Perhaps it will serve the purpose of avoiding that matters escalate to the formidable level of CAS…

An important component of the new legal system is the introduction of new Legal Regulations, a List of Penalties and a Catalog of Administrative Sanctions.   My review of these documents suggests that the EHF now has in place a very solid basis for handling especially the often very sensitive and highly publicized issues involved in the EHF competitions.  There are reasons to believe that a more effective and speedy resolution can be reached, without worries about major inconsistencies.  The structure for penalties seems generally appropriate, with scope for quite substantial action in terms of both suspensions and financial repercussions in serious cases.

Of course, as the prescribed penalties for each type of situation are normally expressed either as a very broad range or in the form of a minimum, the key will be the early precedents when the new system is beginning to be applied.  A tendency to be very soft and regularly choose the lowest punishments possible would send a very undesirable signal.  The provisions will not in themselves serve as a deterrent; they require that the decision-makers have some courage.

The German Handball Bundesliga (HBL) has just come out with a somewhat surprising new regulation at the start of the new season.  In recent years, there has been an unfortunate tendency in the direction of increasingly frequent and ‘uninhibited’ criticism against referees, on the part of coaches and players in a very public manner.  This has contributed to a negative atmosphere, not just in the individual case but more generally in the co-existence between teams and referees.  It has also tended to have an effect on how spectators and the general public understand what is permissible in terms of similar actions.

Accordingly, the HBL is now, quite appropriately, finding it necessary to focus on new regulations for this kind of situations.  Clearly, the intention is to avoid the spontaneous and public negative reactions, for instance in a press conference, right after the game.  Team representatives should have a chance to calm down and perhaps review video recordings and be more certain of the facts before speaking up.  So it is now forbidden for players, team officials and club representatives to express themselves in public regarding referees or other match officials in any way whatsoever within 48 hours of a game.

As has been noted in the media, perhaps one needs to introduce some further clarifications or at least make sure that new regulation is applied with some common sense.   An excessively literal or bureaucratic application might backfire.  It would hardly seem to be punishable if a coach or player spontaneously praises a referee when meeting right after the game.   And the definition of what is meant by public expressions is not really very clear.   Similarly, if someone comments on a game of another team that they witnessed, should this be covered etc?   So the intention is laudable, and personally I am certainly in favor of offering more protection for the referees, but the success may depend on the details of the interpretation of this new idea.

The battles of Thessaloniki

An earlier version...

Almost exactly 20 years ago, Greece hosted the Men’s Junior World Handball Championship in Athens.  Now the turn has come to the second city of Greece, Thessaloniki, a city of prominence both historically and in modern Greece.  Over the centuries, many important battles have been fought in the area.  Let us hope that the battles on the handball courts over the next two weeks will be less bloody, although I am sure that they will be dramatic enough.

 Handball has a rather modest existence in Greece, at least in comparison with football and basketball.  PAOK and Aris are great rivals from the host city in both those sports, and they have also had some success at the continental level.  However, the conspicuous lack of spectators (except when the home team was playing) during the opening days, suggests that handball in July is not a favorite activity of the locals.  And of course, they currently have more fundamental issues to worry about and more important things to spend their money on.

The Junior World Championship tends to be a very interesting event for many reasons.  You can see the players who will be the stars on their national teams some years from now.  And it is exciting to see how the traditional styles of the adult players from different countries can be recognized also among their young talents.  Moreover, for many of the players it is their first time in an intercontinental event, and you will see some interesting ‘cross-cultural’ clashes in terms of tactics, style, and mentality.  The 2011 event promises to be as thrilling as many of its forerunners.

It seems a bit premature to start picking favorites after just two games per team.  Moreover, the main conclusion is rather that there will be many heated battles in each preliminary group, as teams are fighting for positions for the ’1/8-finals’, where teams from ‘neighboring’ groups will be playing 1-4, 2-3, 3-2 and 4-1.  So it is critical to try to gain one of the top positions in the group, and this will guarantee interesting match-ups until the end of the group play, even if in some groups the two teams that will be going to the ‘consolation round’ are already becoming known. 

In group A, there was the traditional battle between France and Tunisia today, and despite playing a careless style that caused many 2-minutes penalties, Tunisia was able to use a better scoring power to win rather easily in the end.  But Tunisia already lost against Slovenia, whereas France gained a point against a solid Norwegian team that today went on to defeat Serbia.  France may be living dangerously here if they do not improve.

Denmark is the likely favorite in group B, despite having to fight until the finish line in order to defeat Algeria.  The Algerians played with speed and tenacity today, after having had a rather modest game yesterday against the less experienced home team.  Argentina lost today against Qatar, but both teams have a good chance to advance to the 1/8-finals. I could see either Qatar or Algeria causing some surprises at later stage.  Newcomer Venezuela will find it hard to win a game here.

In group C it would be easy for Benin to feel a bit overwhelmed.  Here we have had battles today between perennial top teams Russia vs. Germany and Korea vs. Egypt, while Benin themselves tried to put up a brave fight against Brazil.  Germany played a smart and systematic handball against opponents looking like an old Soviet style team.  There is some special interest here in the sense that the Germans are coached by Martin Heuberger in his final effort with the juniors, before he takes over the senior German team.   Korea has a quick but small team, and after an 8-4 lead they got ‘outmuscled’ by the strong and physical Egyptians.  At half-time it was 13-13, but soon it went from 16-16 to 17-24.  It would be not be surprising if the Koreans join Benin in the consolation round.

Iran just might be able to fight successfully against Hungary on the final day of group play, if one judges from the results so far.  Sweden has been a bit slow in pulling away from Iran and Canada in their games, but in the end they won comfortably.  Spain seemed to be more convincing after an unexpectedly easy win against Hungary, but after today’s Hungarian fiasco against Portugal, perhaps the Spanish strength still remains to be tested.  The next two games, against Sweden and Iberian rival Portugal will tell us more. 

As John mentioned in his posting earlier today, we have webcasts of very high quality from Greece, but the crux is that you have to be available to catch the games live.   The more intriguing games tomorrow, in the early afternoon my time here in the Washington area, are Qatar-Algeria, Argentina-Greece and Russia-Korea.   Then, after a rest day on Wednesday, you will need to check the standings in each group to find your best match-ups for Thursday and Friday, but during a couple of time slots you may need to have two computers going!

Hypo and Brazil: from controversy to harmony

In Brazilian colors

In connection with the 2009 Women’s World Championship, Hypo decided to make a point regarding the lack of compensation and insurance when releasing their club players to national teams.  They essentially used coercion to make the players refrain from joining their national teams, something that happened to hit the Brazilian national team particularly hard.  The whole situation caused a lot of controversy at the time, and Hypo even took the further step of taking the matter to court, challenging the IHF/EHF rights to demand that players be released.  Subsequent arrangements for compensation may have made it a non-issue.

In any case, Hypo has continued to have several Brazilian top players as key members of its team.  And for the 2011-12 season, it appears that it has gone even further.  According to reports both in Brazilian and European media, no less than eight players, i.e., half of the national team squad from Brazil will be under contract with Hypo.   Clearly, it must be beneficial for both Hypo and Brazil to have all these players together on a club team in this way.  The Austrian league does not offer much of a challenge, but Hypo will again be a major contender in the EHF Champions League and also tends to arrange other strong international competition for its team.

But this is not the entire extent of the Brazilian impact in Vienna!  Hypo and Brazil have signed a contract under which also the other members of the Brazilian squad will be able to practice with their colleagues on the Hypo team.   And the coach for the Brazilian team, Morten Soubak of Denmark, will be able to visit frequently to follow the practices and progress of his many players.  It appears that the financing of this whole arrangement is supported by the Brazilian Olympian Committee, in its efforts to assist strong candidates for Olympic success.

Indeed, with a World Championship soon to be hosted by Brazil in the Sao Paulo region, furthermore preceded by the Olympic Qualifying through the PanAmerican Games in Guadalajara, it is not an exaggeration to say that the next six months may be pivotal in the climb of the Brazilians towards the absolute top in the world.   Personally, I would not be surprised if they could shock the rest of the top teams and contend for a medal in the World Championship.  They have a highly talented team at this point in time, with athletes of a high caliber.  If one adds the advantage that comes from practicing and playing serious games together over such an extended period, this just might be what brings them up to the very top.

Is this behavior acceptable for a World Championship organizer?

Effective July 1, the European Handball Federation (EHF) introduced a new internal legal system, with a new structure and with a brand new List of Penalties.   This is a laudable effort, and I will come back to that in a separate article shortly.   But I bet that the EHF had never envisaged what kind of case would be the first disciplinary case coming up following July 1.

In early July, as is the practice of the EHF, a ‘Men’s European Open 19′ was organized in Goteborg, Sweden, parallel to the famous Partille Cup.  The emphasis is on the word ‘open’.  This enables the EHF to invite any interested nations, including, as has been happening before, non-European teams.  On this occasion, Qatar was offered the opportunity, something that clearly many other non-European nations envy them.

Key to the story then is that Israel is generally part of Europe in the world of sports, essentially to avoid the kind of situations that arose here.  And Israel did indeed participate in the event.  Moreover, the teams from Qatar and Israel were placed in ‘neighboring’ groups, with a risk that was foreseeable from the beginning that they might find themselves in the same group in the intermediate round.  This should have given the Qatari the necessary opportunity to consider the possible implications.

And what happened, of course, is that Israel and Qatar, together with Belarus and Portugal, came together in the next round.  Except that, when on July 7 the match was to have bee played, the Israeli had to wait in vain for their opponents.  I am not familiar with how the Qatari may have presented their explanations to the EHF and at what level their decision was instigated.  They were promptly penalized, not just through a default in this match but by being ‘kicked out’ from the rest of the event, prohibited from returning next year, and required to pay a fine.

Perhaps with that some will feel that the matter is finished, but I do not have that opinion.  We had a rather strange situation where Qatar voluntarily competed in an international event, but under the auspices of the EHF, not the IHF.  So the EHF, in return for its hospitality had to take on this issue, and the IHF was not having any formal role in the process.  I do not even know if the EHF in any way has specifically ‘reported’ the matter to the IHF.  Clearly the IHF is not showing any signs of dealing with the issue.

And such an issue would indeed be a hot potato for the IHF and its President.  I can testify that for years the handball of Israel has enjoyed a status of privilege at the highest level of the IHF.  Maybe it has something to do with Egyptian-Israeli relations.  (In fact, the tradition continues, in the form of an inexplicable nomination of ‘not very outstanding’ referees from Israel to a World Championship later this year…). 

A slightly similar situation happened in the past, when an IHF match delegate from Iran refused to accept an assignment in a World Championship game involving Israel.  On that occasion, the punishment was swift.  Of course, technically the culprit at that time was an individual IHF official, although one can imagine that the instructions came from ‘a higher level’.  Now we are talking about a decision involving a federation, Qatar, and its national team.  Clearly the responsibility rests with the federation and the highest sports and political authorities of the country.

Accordingly my question to the IHF and to the international handball family is:  how does this action square with the responsibility that Qatar has sought and been given, in terms of being nominated as the host for the 2015 Men’s World Championship???   Clearly, their infringement is not a minor one.  It goes very explicitly against one of the fundamental aspects of the IHF By-Laws, a clause stating that: “The IHF tolerates no discrimination on the basis of race, creed or political orientation.”  There is no credible alternative explanation for the failure of the Qatari team to take the court in the scheduled game against Israel.

So, can Qatar be allowed to remain the host for 2015 after this incident?   How can one trust that this country/federation will carry out all of its obligations?   How can one trust that all potential participants will be treated properly?  What would happen if the Israeli team somehow were to qualify for 2015?  As I see it, one should not accept reassurances from the Qatari, and then just wait and see.  In my personal opinion, what happened in Goteborg appears to have disqualified them as hosts of a World Championship!

Iceland’s women handball players breaking through internationally

EHF allows these weapons and uniforms???

As most people who follow international handball are well aware, it is never a surprise when the Icelandic men’s national team has success in World or European Championships.  But it has been more surprising that, in a country well-known for having a strong women’s emancipation, the Icelandic women handball players have not had many good showings internationally in the past.  However, it seems that a change is now coming.

Some thought that it was just a fluke that Iceland finally managed to qualify for the women’s European Championship in 2010.  This was achieved through a home-and-away qualification win against Austria.  It was suspected that this was perhaps more due to a temporary weakness in Austrian women’s handball, especially after Iceland went on to lose all its three matches in the group play in the European Championship.  But then one must note that the opponents were Russia, Montenegro and Croatia, and that the losses were not with really discouraging margins.

Nevertheless, it came as a bit of a shock when the result was announced from the Iceland home game in the qualifying against Ukraine last month.  Ukraine has really strong traditions on the women’s side; indeed the Soviet dominance during many decades in the past was largely due to the strength of the Ukrainians, led by the husband-wife team of Coach Turtchin and team captain and world-class player Turtchina.  So the 37-18 result was really remarkable.  And the Icelandic women seemed to have little difficulty in holding on in the away game, getting a 24-24 tie.

It was known that as a team seeded in the lowest performance row, Iceland had to expect to be drawn in a very tough group in the World Championship to be held in Brazil in December.  And it will certainly be tough.  Although four teams out of six will qualify from each preliminary group for the subsequent 1/8-finals, it would seem to require a miraculous performance from the Icelandic women in order to advance, now that we know the results of the draw.

The group, which will play its matches in Santos, is headed by Norway and also includes the new power team from Montenegro, the perennially strong African champions from Angola, Germany, and China.  Germany was almost a surprise qualifier after the disaster in the European Championship, so they will be determined to seek revenge.  And the Chinese women have come on strong after the surge in connection with the 2008 Olympics.  So to get ahead of two of these five teams will certainly not be easy. 

It should be noted that the upswing for the Icelandic women is not likely to be a temporary thing.  They had teams that in the ‘under-20′ and ‘under-18′ categories did really well in the qualifying stages, even if they failed to reach the final round in the 2011 European Championships.  In the younger category, they lost out on goal difference, having gained the same points as Spain and Croatia.  In the older category, they again lost again Spain and had a narrow defeat against Serbia, in a group played in Serbia.  So the clear impression is that there are many talent younger players making good progress towards the senior level.

If we then get to see the same fighting spirit from the women as the men traditionally have displayed, then the Icelandic team is likely to become a crowd favorite in Brazil and wherever they will be competing. We wish them the best of luck!

Ciudad Real is now Neptuno but plays in Madrid under the name Atletico!

Neptun(o) - larger than the world?

Last night it finally become clarified what will be the identity of the Spanish top club Ciudad Real in Spanish and EHF competition during the coming season.   On the basis of media reports, there was previously speculation of some kind of merger with football giant Real Madrid, as I commented in an earlier posting.   However, it has now been announced that the team will be appearing under the name of Real Madrid’s local rival Atletico Madrid instead.

I am chosing my words carefully, because it appears that we are talking about a one-year arrangement under which Atletico lends its name to the team of Ciudad Real.  But to make it more complicated, one should really say that the club Ciudad Real is now registered in Madrid as the club Neptuno.   And then Neptuno’s ‘senior’ team is allowed to use the name Atletico, which as I have commented earlier, has really proud traditions in the handball of Spain.

In this way, while the matches in the Spanish League and the EHF Champions League will be played in Madrid, possibly in Palacio de Deportes, the rest of the activities of the club Neptuno may well take place in the city of Ciudad Real.  So the players may continue to live there and and practice there, but when the time comes for the ‘home’ games, they will take their uniforms and travel to Madrid.

How this will be received in the city of Ciudad Real is perhaps not so certain.   Will the faithful fans travel with the team and continue to support them?   And whether the team will quickly be able to establish a fan base in Madrid is not so clear.  Presumably there is some dormant handball interest in the capital, so perhaps it will work out well.   By the way, it has not been mentioned whether the use of the name Atletico also means that the team will adopt the classic red-white stripes of Atletico…

Beyond this specific development, there is of course the more fundamental question of the economic viability of expensive, world-class handball in Spain.  Will the money be there to support top teams with highly-paid players from abroad, and will there be sponsors and resources that will allow some of the weaker team to stay alive?

There are also more systemic concerns.   The referees of the top league are still owed a large part of their remuneration from the 2010-11 season, and the Spanish Federation has had to step in to help out in the meantime.   This is only one reason why the situation between the Federation and the League is very tense. 

And the highest sports authorities of Spain are still having serious concerns about the whole idea of Spain being the organizer of the Men’s World’s Championship 2013.  Many of the planned host cities are having problems with the financing.   The Spanish Federation seems to have asked the IHF for a loan to bridge them over!  Who knows:  perhaps there is still a chance for France, the disppointed loser in the fight for the 2015 Championship, to get in ahead of Qatar by taking over 2013…

Brazil and Argentina meet yet again in a final; but Cuba causes the excitement

It happens quite often, when two semifinals are played one after the other, that great excitement is followed by an anticlimax.  This is what happened today in San Bernardo in the Panamerican Women’s Championship.  

Cuba had already offered a couple of great performances, but today they showed a tremendous determination and tenacity in the semifinal against the defending champions Argentina.  Early in the game, Argentina gained a 7-4 lead and a Cuban player was given a ‘red card’, so for the rest of the game they did not have more than eleven players available as compared with sixteen for Argentina.  But at least this is better than the seven they had in the first game of the event.  And their goalkeeper was putting up an absolutely spectacular performance.  So at half-time it was tied at 13-13 and the game continued to be close throughout the second half.   Cuba obtained a two-goal lead just before the end, but Argentina was able to tie the game at 28-28.

Double overtime followed.  Because after 5+5 minutes the score was 33-33.  And believe it or not, after an additional 5+5 minutes the scoreboard showed 38-38!  So on to a 7-meter shootout.  Here the more experienced Argentines finally managed to get the upper hand.  After the Cubans missed the third shot, hitting the crossbar, Argentina secured the win by scoring on both the fourth and the fifth throw.  In other words, the final result was 43-41.  Next after the Argentine team, perhaps the happiest ones were the Brazilian team.   They surely did not mind that their opponents in tomorrow’s final had to go through the drama of 80 minutes plus a shootout…   But the Cubans should be proud of their efforts.

In the second semifinal, Brazil had an easy time against Uruguay, just as expected.  The final result was 40-14!  When hosting an event and therefore having the right to choose a preliminary group, Brazil traditionally uses the tactic of taking the group with the stronger runner-up, in this case Cuba (or Chile) so that they can have an easier, safer semifinal…   So tomorrow we will have Brazil-Argentina in the final and Cuba-Uruguay in the bronze medal game.   All the four teams are already qualified for the World Championship.  In the 5th place game, Chile defeated the Dominican Republic by the score 28-22.  Mexico avoided last place by beating Venezuela 25-23, but both these teams will be relegated next time. 

Apropos my arguments yesterday about the tournament format:  I feel a bit sorry for Chile;  I think there are reasons to the believe that they are stronger than Uruguay and that they deserved to have a chance to be in the semifinal and, more important, in the World Championship.  But because of the format, they never got the chance to play against Uruguay.

Argentina, Cuba and Uruguay join Brazil at the Women’s World Championship

Cuba a nice surprise but Brazil seems stronger

After the completion of today’s matches in the preliminary round of the PanAmerican Women’s Championship, the teams qualifying from PanAmerica to the World Championship are already determined.  Argentina, Cuba and Uruguay will have to return to the Sao Paulo are in December.

Because Brazil is the host in December, PanAmerica will have a total of four slots, as Brazil does not count against the normal quota of three.  Therefore, as nobody has seriously expected Brazil to fail to reach the semifinals, it was generally assumed that placing first or second in the preliminary groups and thus qualifying for the semifinals would be enough for the other teams.  In fact, when I am posting this article, just before Brazil plays its final group game against Chile, I am still technically ‘speculating’.  But my assumptions would fail to be correct only if Brazil were to lose against Chile by 23 goals or more.  Should that happen, then I would politely suggest that Interpol would need to be asked to investigate.

Brazil won their group games against Mexico and Cuba as clearly as one would have expected.  Perhaps some had thought that Chile would be in contention for the second place.  But as John Ryan reported two days ago, Cuba shocked the Chileans in the opening match.  Having only 7 players available, the Cubans complete ‘steamrolled’ the Chileans.  And the Cuban women outclassed Mexico with 35-16 today, after having lost against Brazil yesterday.  Should we start speculating about Cuba having a good chance against the defending champion Argentina in the semi-final tomorrow!?  (It would have an impact on the seeding for the World Championship).

In the other group, Argentina did not really start out as champions.  They fell behind early and just barely managed to take the lead against Uruguay before half-time.  The final result was 21-14.  Then came a comfortably win against Venezuela, and today’s seemingly easy win against the Dominican Republic may suggest that Argentina has found the form.  The excitement in this group was set up with a draw (20-20) between Uruguay and the Dominican Republic yesterday.  After Uruguay won 43-27 against Venezuela after a nervous opening in today’s first game, they then had to rely on Argentina to win by at least five or six goals against the Dominican Republic.  But it seems the suspense came to an end early, as Argentina had 14-6 at half-time and then went on to win by 33-16.

We will come back on Saturday with a summary of the final results, and also an overview of the draw for the World Championship which will be undertaken immediately afterwards.   But the way this event evolved so far makes it impossible for me to refrain from mentioning an idea that I have tried many times to convince the PanAmerican leaders about.  The tournament format is always the same, with two groups of four and then semifinals and medal games.  And the situation with qualifying for the World Championship is always the same, with either three or four teams qualifying.

In other words, the real drama is not so much around the final, or even about which teams will play in the final, because almost always in recent years it has been Argentina-Brazil.  So it seems that every effort should be made to ensure that the next best teams really get a chance to be in the semifinals, rather than having one of them eliminated after the preliminary round by placing third there.  We know that the strength of the teams is unpredictable from one event to the next.  So the seemingly better approach would be to have the group winners go directly to the final, and to have the ‘crossovers’ between second-placed against third-placed and vice versa.  Then we would feel sure that we knew who were really the deserving teams in the number three and number four positions.  But perhaps Cuba will be the exception that proves me wrong tomorrow!  Until Saturday…

IHF President insists on undermining the refereeing at the World Championships

It is frustrating and disappointing to feel obliged to write yet again about a theme that I had hoped would be dead and buried.  But it is now ‘strongly rumored’ that the IHF President appears to insist on enforcing his personal and absurd ideas on the refereeing in the Youth and Junior World Championships.

I am talking about his persistence about splitting up well-established referees couples from around the world and suddenly using them in ‘mixed’ couples during the most important events for them and teams. 

As I have noted before, there is nothing ‘holy’ about the idea of permanent couples.  Mixed couples (or trios) function in basketball.  So even if the mutual familiarity and teamwork within the couple are critical for good performances of handball referees, it is theoretically possible that mixed couples could function in handball also.  But, this would be dependent on a worldwide agreement to change the current system, and instead start bringing up young referees in the habit of constantly changing partners.  In this way, they would be completely used to the method, if one day they were nominated to a World Championship.

However, we currently have a system under which referees around the world become used to a fixed partner, as they climb the career ladder up to the international level.  This means that they know each other and trust each other completely.  They have the same interpretations, and they know what to expect in each situation.  Clearly this facilitates quick and accurate decision-making in hectic moments.

Moreover, in recent years, the IHF and many continental/national federations have had their top referees use headsets and wireless communication to be in constant contact with each other.  This obviously depends on quick and easy verbal exchanges that would be totally undermined when two referees of different nationalities and native languages are put together. 

Again, if one wanted to experiment with an approach based on mixed couples, to investigate the desirability of a complete change in the future, then they are safe events where this could be done.  The reason why this is not happening is that no major handball federations are interested in the idea and that the IHF President has not had the courage to try to convince them.

But in any case it is obvious that this kind of experiment does not belong in a World Championship.  On previous occasions, when the IHF President came with the same idea, the participating federations joined together and refused to accept this inappropriate experiment.  One would hope that either this happens again, or that somebody can convince the President to stop the nonsense.  But I am not so optimistic.  The reason is that the President, as always, is sure that “he knows best” and that nobody can stop him…

Summer topics in Europe

Whenever someone has the resources and the determination to take new initiatives, it always tends to cause a stir, with both support and criticism.  Jesper Nielsen, a wealthy Danish businessman has the financial capacity to go against prevailing trends of cut-backs and economic worries in European club handball.  He is able, as an owner and sponsor, to keep two strong teams going, AG Kopenhamn and Rhein-Neckar-Lowen, but not without controversy.

OF course, it gives the European Handball Federation (EHF) some headaches, when the issue related to dual ownership comes up.  In theory at least, there seems to be some scope for manipulation, if clubs that are participating in the same event, such as the Champions League, are under the same management.  But there is also some agitation in Germany, where the R-N-L manager Thorsten Storm has criticized his boss for giving lower priority to the German club in favor of AGK.   Storm has expressed concerns that R-N-L has not been getting the resources and the attention that the club needs and deserves.  Instead, top players, such as Olafur Stefansson, are now moving from R-N-L to AGK.

And despite the excitement that the emergence of AGK has created in Denmark, there are very much mixed feelings about having the men’s league dominated too strongly by one team.  The financial status and the competitiveness of the Danish league are seen as depending on the excitement generated by a tough and close competition for the title and the top positions among several more or less equal teams.  And of course, a little bit of envy may also have something to do with negative reactions.

Moving on to Spain, perhaps a little bit of parity is on the horizon, after what has become known about the financial problems of the two totally dominating clubs in recent years, namely Ciudad Real and Barcelona.  We are probably only days away from a decision regarding Ciudud Real and a seemingly unavoidable move to Madrid.  But contrary to what I commented on in a recent article, it now seems that the best bet is a merger, not with Real Madrid but with football rival Atletico Madrid.  This of course offers an interesting twist, as in fact Atletico Madrid was a handball team with great traditions as the dominating club in the 1960s and again in the 1980s.  Famous coaches, such as the Domingo Barcenas and the current Federation president Juan de Dios Roman Seco combined with Spanish and international star players to gain numerous League championships and cup wins.

Barcelona’s triumph in the handball Champions League may have made it impossible for the football-focused club management to mistreat handball completely.  But a major budget cut-back seems already decided.  The expenses for the football team have sky-rocketed, due to both successful and disastrous player acquisitions.  It was noted that the net loss after the initial purchase and subsequent bargain sale of Ibrahimovic was in the order of 40-50 million Euros, which is much more than the entire budget for handball.  So now handball and basketball will be treated much less generously (and baseball is eliminated altogether), and what this might mean in terms of the ability to keep a generously staffed and paid handball team, with many international imports, is hard to predict.

The EHF has also had some concerns about developments in other ‘corners’ or Europe.  In most parts of the former Yugoslavia, there has been a strong interest in cooperating around a regional league, which would provide some interesting competition not just for the top clubs but also for those who miss out on the top EHF events.  Slovenian clubs seem to prefer to focus on their own league, and the top Hungarian clubs have also declined invitations.  Instead, Tatran Presov from Slovakia (who would need to win a qualifying group in order to be in the EHF Champions League) would like to take part.  Some interest also seems to exist in Poland, especially on the part of Kielce, who have a seemingly very strong team but stilled managed to miss the Polish title and the chance to participate again in Champions League.

However, it appears that the EHF has asserted its privileges regarding ‘cross-border’ competitions.  It would not seem possible to deny neighboring countries the chance to organize an exchange on an ongoing basis, but the intended participation of precisely Tatran, a non-neighbor of the Balkan countries, seemed to give the EHF a basis for stepping in.  Apart from this particular league, which had preferred to shed its ‘Balkan’ label, for the more flexible name ‘Southeastern Handball Association’, there are similar regional efforts among the Baltic countries and the BeNeLux, whose clubs rarely get very far in EHF competitions.  Apart from the principles involved, and the obvious reluctance to encourage rivaling events, it seems that the EHF also might have some concerns about the image issues that could follow from a potential lack of discipline, poor crowd control and shaky refereeing in some region.

Is the draw more exciting than the event itself?

Is this when the medals are decided?

Of course I must admit that sometimes I have started speculating about an event when I have seen the result of the draw.   And it is of course legitimate to discuss what might happen, even if the event in question will not take place for another six months.  But sometimes the euphoria seems a bit excessive, and one almost gets the impression that the media create a hype to have something to get excited about and write about when there is no event currently going on.

But it then seems to go a bit far when team representatives are being interviewed, and much of the story is focused on bad luck in draw, or unfairness in the seeding even before the draw has been made, seemingly to create some excuses for the possibility of bad results when the event finally takes place.  Examples of this artificial excitement have been seen recently, during the month of June, when the draw for the Men’s European Championship in January 2012 took place, and when the seeding both for the Women’s World Championship in December and for the EHF 2011-12 Champions League were announced.

We all know that the preliminary round of the Men’s European Championship is always very tough, typically with 14-15 really strong teams out of 15.  So even of three teams from each group of four go on to the next round, it is critical first to have some relative luck with opponents in that first round, and then, when looking ahead, also with the teams placed in the neighboring group on the same half.  I cannot remember having such a unanimous sigh of relief as among the four teams in Group B:  Germany, Sweden, Czech Rep., and FYRO Macedonia.  They were in a sense insulting each other by talking excitedly about how lucky they had been.  I would not want to be the part of the team that fails to qualify from that group.  What possible excuses will they have?  Perhaps the bad referees…

By contrast, there has to be a ‘group of death’ in every event.  And if perennial champions France and recent bronze medal winners Spain are drawn in the same group, that certainly is enough,  And if you add Russia and Hungary to that mix, then one can understand if the optimism is not so great.  If one then, like France and Spain undoubtedly want to do, look ahead to the next stage, it is not exactly reassuring to know that three out of the group with Croatia, Island, Norway and Slovenia will be waiting there.  In Slovenia they talk especially about the game against Croatia, but in Croatia they seem to be more concerned about the tough battle they always seem to have against Iceland.

On the women’s side, the draw will not take place until July 2, when the PanAmerican Championship finishes.  But there has already been some grumbling about the caprices of how the teams have been placed in seeding groups.  The second category finds Kazakhstan mixed in with Denmark and France, while the unpredictable opponents from Angola and Brazil are on the third line.  Germany, who were a surprise qualifier against Hungary, after the dismal exit from the European Championship, now find themselves down on the fourth line together with Korea.  Which team from a higher level would want to see Korea being drawn into their group?  Finally, China and Spain have had to accept a fifth-level seed, but they are surely capable of causing surprises.  So the final draw will surely be a nerve-racking affair for the participants and their supporters.

Finally, the seeding of the men’s teams for the next Champions League has already created a stir.  First, of course, there was the issue of which teams would be allowed to compete for the wild-card entry.  For some reasons that are hard to understand, the EHF open mentioned five candidates for four slots, and then went ahead and left one team out without any clear criteria.  But perhaps Skjern on the men’s side were being ‘punished’ for the fact that their Danish compatriots Viborg were given a wild card chance on the women’s side.

As the draw is not directly based on the relative qualities and results of the individual team but rather on the rankings within the countries, there are some seemingly odd outcomes.  For instance, Chekhovski and Montpellier were placed in category 1, whole Ciudad Real and Kiel had to accept line 3.  And in between there are teams like Veszprem, Croatia and AG on line 2.  But the lack of grumbling may have been the effect of the EHF’s rules being clear, which they apparently were not for the Men’s EURO 2012. 

What makes the draw a little bit anticlimactic is that, just as was the case in 2010-11, there seems to be a demarcation between the top 16 team and the eight teams that will complete the groups.  In other words, it might not matter much for the better teams which group they are drawn in, because as long as four teams out six advance, there is not too much of a risk for them.  The risk is instead, for neutral observers who simply want some excitement, that again the whole group phase will be a long, boring ‘transportation stage’.  Let’s keep our fingers crossed for some surprises and unexpected thrills.

Page 6 of 23« First...«456789»1020...Last »

Advertisement

Categories

Follow Team Handball News on Twitter

Follow TeamHandball on Twitter

Team Handball News on Facebook

Who's Online

19 visitors online now
5 guests, 14 bots, 0 members
Powered by Visitor Maps