post

Is this behavior acceptable for a World Championship organizer?

Effective July 1, the European Handball Federation (EHF) introduced a new internal legal system, with a new structure and with a brand new List of Penalties.   This is a laudable effort, and I will come back to that in a separate article shortly.   But I bet that the EHF had never envisaged what kind of case would be the first disciplinary case coming up following July 1.

In early July, as is the practice of the EHF, a ‘Men’s European Open 19’ was organized in Goteborg, Sweden, parallel to the famous Partille Cup.  The emphasis is on the word ‘open’.  This enables the EHF to invite any interested nations, including, as has been happening before, non-European teams.  On this occasion, Qatar was offered the opportunity, something that clearly many other non-European nations envy them.

Key to the story then is that Israel is generally part of Europe in the world of sports, essentially to avoid the kind of situations that arose here.  And Israel did indeed participate in the event.  Moreover, the teams from Qatar and Israel were placed in ‘neighboring’ groups, with a risk that was foreseeable from the beginning that they might find themselves in the same group in the intermediate round.  This should have given the Qatari the necessary opportunity to consider the possible implications.

And what happened, of course, is that Israel and Qatar, together with Belarus and Portugal, came together in the next round.  Except that, when on July 7 the match was to have bee played, the Israeli had to wait in vain for their opponents.  I am not familiar with how the Qatari may have presented their explanations to the EHF and at what level their decision was instigated.  They were promptly penalized, not just through a default in this match but by being ‘kicked out’ from the rest of the event, prohibited from returning next year, and required to pay a fine.

Perhaps with that some will feel that the matter is finished, but I do not have that opinion.  We had a rather strange situation where Qatar voluntarily competed in an international event, but under the auspices of the EHF, not the IHF.  So the EHF, in return for its hospitality had to take on this issue, and the IHF was not having any formal role in the process.  I do not even know if the EHF in any way has specifically ‘reported’ the matter to the IHF.  Clearly the IHF is not showing any signs of dealing with the issue.

And such an issue would indeed be a hot potato for the IHF and its President.  I can testify that for years the handball of Israel has enjoyed a status of privilege at the highest level of the IHF.  Maybe it has something to do with Egyptian-Israeli relations.  (In fact, the tradition continues, in the form of an inexplicable nomination of ‘not very outstanding’ referees from Israel to a World Championship later this year…). 

A slightly similar situation happened in the past, when an IHF match delegate from Iran refused to accept an assignment in a World Championship game involving Israel.  On that occasion, the punishment was swift.  Of course, technically the culprit at that time was an individual IHF official, although one can imagine that the instructions came from ‘a higher level’.  Now we are talking about a decision involving a federation, Qatar, and its national team.  Clearly the responsibility rests with the federation and the highest sports and political authorities of the country.

Accordingly my question to the IHF and to the international handball family is:  how does this action square with the responsibility that Qatar has sought and been given, in terms of being nominated as the host for the 2015 Men’s World Championship???   Clearly, their infringement is not a minor one.  It goes very explicitly against one of the fundamental aspects of the IHF By-Laws, a clause stating that: “The IHF tolerates no discrimination on the basis of race, creed or political orientation.”  There is no credible alternative explanation for the failure of the Qatari team to take the court in the scheduled game against Israel.

So, can Qatar be allowed to remain the host for 2015 after this incident?   How can one trust that this country/federation will carry out all of its obligations?   How can one trust that all potential participants will be treated properly?  What would happen if the Israeli team somehow were to qualify for 2015?  As I see it, one should not accept reassurances from the Qatari, and then just wait and see.  In my personal opinion, what happened in Goteborg appears to have disqualified them as hosts of a World Championship!

post

Argentina, Cuba and Uruguay join Brazil at the Women’s World Championship

Cuba a nice surprise but Brazil seems stronger

After the completion of today’s matches in the preliminary round of the PanAmerican Women’s Championship, the teams qualifying from PanAmerica to the World Championship are already determined.  Argentina, Cuba and Uruguay will have to return to the Sao Paulo are in December.

Because Brazil is the host in December, PanAmerica will have a total of four slots, as Brazil does not count against the normal quota of three.  Therefore, as nobody has seriously expected Brazil to fail to reach the semifinals, it was generally assumed that placing first or second in the preliminary groups and thus qualifying for the semifinals would be enough for the other teams.  In fact, when I am posting this article, just before Brazil plays its final group game against Chile, I am still technically ‘speculating’.  But my assumptions would fail to be correct only if Brazil were to lose against Chile by 23 goals or more.  Should that happen, then I would politely suggest that Interpol would need to be asked to investigate.

Brazil won their group games against Mexico and Cuba as clearly as one would have expected.  Perhaps some had thought that Chile would be in contention for the second place.  But as John Ryan reported two days ago, Cuba shocked the Chileans in the opening match.  Having only 7 players available, the Cubans complete ‘steamrolled’ the Chileans.  And the Cuban women outclassed Mexico with 35-16 today, after having lost against Brazil yesterday.  Should we start speculating about Cuba having a good chance against the defending champion Argentina in the semi-final tomorrow!?  (It would have an impact on the seeding for the World Championship).

In the other group, Argentina did not really start out as champions.  They fell behind early and just barely managed to take the lead against Uruguay before half-time.  The final result was 21-14.  Then came a comfortably win against Venezuela, and today’s seemingly easy win against the Dominican Republic may suggest that Argentina has found the form.  The excitement in this group was set up with a draw (20-20) between Uruguay and the Dominican Republic yesterday.  After Uruguay won 43-27 against Venezuela after a nervous opening in today’s first game, they then had to rely on Argentina to win by at least five or six goals against the Dominican Republic.  But it seems the suspense came to an end early, as Argentina had 14-6 at half-time and then went on to win by 33-16.

We will come back on Saturday with a summary of the final results, and also an overview of the draw for the World Championship which will be undertaken immediately afterwards.   But the way this event evolved so far makes it impossible for me to refrain from mentioning an idea that I have tried many times to convince the PanAmerican leaders about.  The tournament format is always the same, with two groups of four and then semifinals and medal games.  And the situation with qualifying for the World Championship is always the same, with either three or four teams qualifying.

In other words, the real drama is not so much around the final, or even about which teams will play in the final, because almost always in recent years it has been Argentina-Brazil.  So it seems that every effort should be made to ensure that the next best teams really get a chance to be in the semifinals, rather than having one of them eliminated after the preliminary round by placing third there.  We know that the strength of the teams is unpredictable from one event to the next.  So the seemingly better approach would be to have the group winners go directly to the final, and to have the ‘crossovers’ between second-placed against third-placed and vice versa.  Then we would feel sure that we knew who were really the deserving teams in the number three and number four positions.  But perhaps Cuba will be the exception that proves me wrong tomorrow!  Until Saturday…

post

The IHF Super Globe is fine as an all star event, but not as a serious competition

The IHF Super Globe is anything but "Super"

Once again the IHF is staging the Super Globe in Qatar this weekend.  It purports to be a club championship of the continents, but with most of the world’s best players playing in Europe it’s more of an all star event, especially with the other continents hiring additional Euros to beef up their rosters.

Christer Ahl had a commentary last year that pretty much covers it.  As not much has changed, here it is again:

https://teamhandballnews.com/2010/05/the-ihf-super-globefine-as-an-all-star-event-but-not-as-a-serious-competition/

post

IHF Congress rejected President’s attempt to legalize autocracy

Proposed autocratic by-laws are rejected by the IHF Congress

 

A few days ago, I attempted to provoke by asking if the Congress participants would turn out to be ‘yes men’, ready to accept the shenanigans of the President, or if there would be enough people ready to stand up and resist.  I am now pleased to report that my expectations were too pessimistic.  There were enough delegates with good judgment and courage, so the proposals for By-Law changes were essentially rejected on those points were the effect would have been to centralize more power with the IHF at the expense of all other stakeholders and/or to give the President more personal power and authority.  These anti-democratic efforts were stopped.  As I had strongly emphasized on several occasions over the past year, this was a crucial issue for the well-being and the further development of our sport, so I must confess that I feel a good deal of personal satisfaction.

I will not get into a lot of detail, now that the proposals have been defeated.  But it is worth noting that the regulations that would have removed rights and instead placed constraints or requirements on continental/national federations, clubs/players, referees/coaches/officials and other stakeholder were dismissed.  Similarly, the Congress rejected the proposal to give the President a number of specfic new prerogatives (‘having political resonsibility for the Head Office, sole responsibility for implementation decisions taken by the Congress, Council and Executive Committee, controlling all financial transactions, handling the relations between all IHF stakeholders etc etc.).

While it is a relief that there are, after all, enough representatives from among our global handball family who are beginning to realize that the President’s inclinations and methods are simply going too far, this does not mean that one can now begin to relax.  On the contrary, this must be seen as just the first step in a broader and stronger effort to get the IHF back on the right track again, in a sound and democratic spirit, for the sake of the optimal development and success of handball.  I will come back to this theme in a separate article next week.

post

IHF Congress: concerns about voting manipulation

Reports from the IHF Congress in Cairo suggest that the IHF President is finding it surprisingly difficult to obtain the 2/3 majority that he needs to get his By-Laws proposals approved.  And, by some strange coincidence (?), at the same time the voting machinery is ‘malfunctioning’ and causing disputes!  Two years ago, at the Election Congress in Cairo, the IHF President insisted on the utilization of electronic voting, instead of secret voting through paper ballots.  With some hesitation on the part of the Congress participants, this was agreed, and this is now supposed to be the standard procedure.

But in the middle of today’s tense voting process, it appears that the electronic voting system did not function properly.  Much to everyone’s amazement, the IHF President then asked the participants to agree to open voting.  Why the simple method of secret voting with paper ballots could not be arranged was apparently not explained.  But the Congress participants refused to accept the suggestion of non-confidential voting.  So the President had to agree to try to get the electronic voting to function again.  But now it is being reported that it was then discovered that the electronic voting was monitored in such a way, that the President could observe the voting of each participant!  Of course this caused a major uproar.

At the moment when this is being written, it is not yet clear how the problems will be resolved and if/how the voting will continue.  There is now a suspicion on the part of some Congress participants, that the IHF regime may quickly try to fly in some additional participants who have not yet been present at the Congress, all with the intention to obtain some crucial additional votes.  Some people are also thinking back to the 2009 Congress in Cairo.  In retrospect, is there now reason to wonder if the voting took place in a proper fashion at this time?   And more generally, it boosts the suspicions as to why the President wants to organize criticial Congresses in locations where he might be in a position to ‘control the environment’ (short of preventing last week’s bombing in Marrakech)!   IHF:  such a wonderful ‘democracy’…!

post

IHF By-Law Proposals: Important changes seem to be emerging

Almost a year ago, I wrote several articles severely criticizing the then emerging proposals for changes in the IHF By-Laws.  These changes were planned to be discussed and adopted at the IHF Congress in Rome last April, but this Congress had to be postponed due to the ash cloud spreading over Europe.  Instead, the proposals will now be put forward at an IHF Congress in Marrakech in the first week of May this year.

My main points of criticism (see article dated April 11, 2010) were:  (1) ‘indications of a heavy-handed shift of power in favor of the IHF, at the expense of all other levels and members in the international handball family’, and (2) ‘a major expansion of the personal power of the President’.  As I noted, ‘this would run counter to all sound and modern principles for the management and decision-making in an international sports organization or, for that matter, in any democratic institution’. 

I am pleased to convey to our readers that it now seems that important changes are being put forward on precisely the two main points above.   Much of the debate a year ago was between EHF representatives and the IHF, and it now appears that it may be a quiet resumption of that dialog which has led to a positive break-through.   From several sources I am getting the information that, although there is no revised version of the overall proposals available at this time, there is indeed an IHF Council decision to adopt key modifications.

It appears that an elimination of the excesses in terms of ‘a power grab’ has been undertaken, and that the intended shift of authority from continents to the IHF regarding responsibility for certain key events has been stopped.   More specifically, this involves the long-standing dispute regarding the responsibility for organizing qualification events to World Championships and Olympic Games.  This is not just a matter of principle and prestige, but potentially also a huge financial issue, involving the revenues from such events.

While there are several other aspects of the initial proposals for new By-Laws that preferably should be changed, this presumably means that key continental representatives in the IHF are now more satisfied with the revised version at least regarding the relations between the IHF and its stakeholders and regarding the personal powers of the President.  The latter had become even more of an issue after the President convinced the IHF Council to convert his role from that of an elected volunteer to a full-time employee.

It may be premature to celebrate, but at least this movement away from what appeared to be hardened positions must be seen as a small triumph, not just for the people directly involved but for the entire international handball family.   While I am eagerly looking forward to the opportunity to read the revised version of the proposals, I want to congratulate those who worked hard to create a positive momentum.  I am also pleased that the IHF President was able to find a way of moving towards a compromise.

THN (21 Mar 2010): President Moustafa’s proposals for new IHF Statutes would legitimize his dictatorship and despotism — who will stop this madness?? https://teamhandballnews.com/2010/03/president-moustafa-proposals-for-new-ihf-statutes-would-legitimize-his-dictatorship-and-despotism-who-will-stop-this-madness/

THN (11 Apr 2010): Changes in IHF By-Laws/Statutes: What is the issue?: https://teamhandballnews.com/2010/04/changes-in-ihf-by-lawsstatutes-what-is-the-issue/

post

2012 Olympic Qualification Update

We’ve updated the 2012 Olympic Qualification page to reflect the recent results of the Men’s 2011 World Championships.

https://teamhandballnews.com/2012-olympic-qual-men/

By winning the title France has joined host, Great Britain, in qualifying for the Olympics in London next year.  Ten spots in the twelve nation tournament remain to be awarded.  Four spots will be awarded to the Continental Federations (Europe, Pan America, Asia and Africa) and 6 spots will be awarded via 3 IHF Qualification Tournaments.

The IHF has decided to use the same format that was used for 2008 Olympic Qualification.  Three round robin tournaments (with 4 nations participating) will be plaayed from 6-8 April, 2012.  The top 2 teams from each tournament will qualify for the Olympics.  Teams will be seeded in these tournaments based on the recently completed World Championship results and the results of upcoming Continental Qualification events.

The nations that placed 2nd through 7th (Denmark, Spain, Sweden, Croatia, Iceland and Hungary) have qualified for IHF Qualification Tournaments.  The World Championships also decided the rank order of the different Continental Federations.  Europe by virtue of France winning the title is ranked as the top Continent.  Pan America is second (Argentina, 12th Place), Asia is 3rd (South Korea, 13th Place) and Africa is 4th (Egypt, 14th Place).  The most significant ramification of the Continental ranking is that Pan America, by virtue of Argentina being the sole non-European team making the main round, picked up an extra qualification tourney spot.

The current seeding for these tournaments is as follows

Tournament 1:  Denmark (Host), Hungary, Europe (2nd), Africa (2nd)
Tournament 2:  Spain (Host), Iceland, Pan America (2nd), Europe (3rd)
Tournament 3:  Sweden (Host), Croatia, Asia (2nd), Pan America (3rd)

It’s fairly likely, however, that this seeding will be altered by the 2012 European Championships as Denmark, Spain or one of the other European teams that finished 2nd-7th at the World Championships will be strong candidates to earn the European Automatic Qualification bid.  This will then set off a cascading effect in terms of which teams will play where.  For instance, should Denmark earn the European bid the placement of teams would change as follows:

Tournament 1:  Spain (Host), Poland, Europe (2nd), Africa (2nd)
Tournament 2:  Sweden (Host), Hungary, Pan America (2nd), Europe (3rd)
Tournament 3:  Croatia (Host), Iceland, Asia (2nd), Pan America (3rd)

Commentary:  As I pointed out 4 years ago, I think most observers would probably consider this format flawed in that it’s fairly certain that the Continental Championship Qualifiers in Tournament 3 will be weaker opponents  than the qualifiers in Tournaments 1 and 2.  Tournament 1 will likely have Germany, Norway, or Serbia as Europe 2 and then either Tunisia or Egypt as Africa 2.  The teams in tournament 2 are likely to be Brazil/Argentina and Germany/Norway/Serbia again.  Contrast that to Tournament 3 where the likely opponents include Japan and Chile/Cuba.   You can pretty much ink in Croatia and Iceland as qualifying out of that tournament.  So, it’s pretty clear that a 3rd or 4th seed is better than a 1st or 2nd seed.  Granted, Spain and Sweden will still likely qualify, but why should they get punished for doing better at the World Championship?

There’s a number of ways that the IHF could have fixed this.  The simplest would probably be a draw for tournament seeding using 4 ranks of 3 teams each.  That would at least even out the likelihood of getting a 3rd European team in each tournament.  Another option would be to rank order the 6 teams that qualify via Continental Championships based on how well they performed at the last WC.  Regardless, it’s clear that the current system is flawed.  It’s probably too late to fix it now, but I guess maybe there’s a chance the IHF could get it right for 2016.

post

Argentina with huge victory over Sweden

Argentina defeated host Sweden 27-22 in what is probably the biggest victory ever for a Pan American team in World Championship history.  For more on this victory check out this Argentina Handball Blog.

Our correspondent in Sweden, Christer Ahl, concurs:

Argentina defeated Sweden, after having dominated the whole match; great goalkeeping, an aggressive and tenacious defense, good fastbreaks and confident shooting were the key factors;  Erwin Feuchtmann was the top scorer. Argentina celebrated as if they had already won the Championship, but in fact they still need one point against Chile to be sure of a place in the main round;  but if they get there, they will bring the 2 points from yesterday with them. The Swedish team and fans are shocked and disappointed;  they figure they lost their chances for a medal, but they admit the Argentina win was fully justified; they now desperately need to win aginst Poland on Thursday.

In an earlier game, Chile sensationally was ahead against Slovakia the whole game, often by 3-4 goals, but with ONE second to go, the Slovaks managed to equalize. However, while the immediate reaction of the Chileans was one of desperation, they soon begun to realize that the point they had gained was a historic one.

In a game in another group, Brazil came close to gaining their first point. They lost by only one goal against a strong Norwegian team, after they failed to use their chance to tie the game in the final minute.

All in all a fantastic day for PanAmerican handball. Now the fans (including my Swedish friends) will no longer doubt that handball exists on our continent as well!!!

IHF and the Clubs — satisfaction with the money but not with the competition calendar?

As we reported yesterday, the IHF has just agreed to pay compensation in different forms to the clubs and federations whose players participate in the Men's World Championships. The overall amount is in the order of 3.8 million Swiss Francs, and the compensation scheme will be implemented starting with the Championship in January 2011.

The details are now also a bit more clear. First it should be noted that the estimated costs for insuring the players against injuries related to their Championship participation is included in the overall amount quoted; this amounts to about 1/2 million Swiss Francs. Similarly included is a 'host fee' in the order of 1.2 million Swiss Francs. Another chunk of money is distributed in the form of prize money to the federations of the top four teams (200.000, 150.000, 75.000 and 25.000 Swiss Francs respectively). In addition, each of the 24 participating federations get a 'qualification bonus' of 25.000 Swiss Francs each, presumably as a gesture in consideration of the expenses incurred for their participation.

This leaves almost exactly 1 million Swiss Francs as a total compensation for the clubs. There is first a 'daily compensation fee' which is paid per player and day, and then a lump sum per player as a 'bonus for training and education'; this bonus also depends on the placement of the teams in the Championship. In total, the clubs of the players on the top four national teams receive 6.000 Swiss Francs per player, while the amount for teams placed 5th-8th is 3.800, for teams placed 9th-16th 2.100, and for teams placed 17th-24th 1.000 Swiss Francs.

This means that for someone who is a key player on his club team but happens to play for a relatively weak national team, the club is certainly not getting a very large amount in relation to the time spent on national team duty. (At this point in time, the value of the Swiss Francs and the U.S. Dollar are almost exactly the same). So it is easy to understand that the reactions vary between comments about a merely symbolic 'compensation' and the importance of having at least the principle of compensation finally established.

What has been kept more quiet is another important agenda item, where the outcome was presumably not what the clubs had hoped for, viz. the international competition calendar. Generally speaking, there have been many concerns expressed along the lines that [u]five[/u] major events in a [u]four-year[/u] period (Olympics, two World Championships and two Continental Championships) is at least one too many, at least from the perspective of Europe. However, no progress appears to have been made on this front, which is perhaps primarily a matter of 'negotiation between the IHF and the continents'.

Moreover, one competition that from a club perspective has been a particular irritant, namely the special qualification tournaments for the Olympic Games, appears to remain for the time being. This means that, just like in 2008, there will be a set of qualifying groups played in early April 2012 for the men and late May 2012 for the women. The timing, which has been protested as particularly awkward for the national men's leagues, is said to be related to "demands from the IOC". Perhaps there can be differences of opinion about the optimal timing, but it seems 'strange' that the IOC would insist on knowing the participating men's handball teams so early. Basketball holds its equivalent events in late June and early July. Indoor volleyball is scheduled for late May, and beach volleyball for July….

IHF meets with representatives of European top men’s clubs – participants appear satisfied

Last month I indicated https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.1081 that the IHF had called a meeting to discuss compensation fees for clubs and insurance coverage for their players who are participating in IHF World Championships. This meeting was held on September 17. Significant was that, for the first time, IHF gave recognition to the entities (FCH and GCH) formally representing these clubs, by inviting the FCH and GCH presidents to attend, in addition to representatives from the top national federations.

This IHF meeting comes after significant progress had already been made at the continental level, between the EHF and the clubs. It also comes at a time when similar strong pressures exist in football, where the club representatives are satisfied with UEFA but express strong dissatisfaction with the IHF’s counterpart, FIFA. http://www.groupclubhandball.com/?p=941

Judging from the relatively few comments that have appeared in sports media so far, following the official IHF announcement today, http://www.ihf.info//MediaCenter/News/NewsDetails/tabid/130/Default.aspx?ID=458 the initial reactions from the club representatives are quite favorable. As indicated in greater detail in the IHF announcement, the IHF is prepared to set aside substantial amounts from the World Championship revenue.

There will be compensation payments in the order of 1 million Swiss Francs, qualification payments, prize money and insurance coverage approaching in aggregate an amount of close to 4 million Swiss Francs for each Men’s World Championship. There are, however, no indications regarding the intentions with regard to the Women’s Championships.

Sweden World Champions in Women’s Youth

In women’s championships it is often a battle between Denmark and Norway, whereas the Swedish successes over the years have come on the men’s side. In fact, Sweden has never before won a medal of any kind in any international championship for women. But Thursday evening in Santo Domingo this trend was broken. Sweden managed to beat Norway in the final, 34-29.

It may seem as if it was a relatively close game, but in fact Sweden followed its pattern of having a long stretch in almost every match where they simply pulled away from the opponents. It was 6-4 after 15 minutes but suddenly 17-10 at half-time and 20-10 early in the second half. Thereafter the Norwegians managed to move gradually closer, but the Swedish victory never seemed threatened.

Sweden had been impressive throughout, having defeated the group rivals France (who finished fourth) by 31-18 and then taking a 22-13 half-time lead against Hungary. The quarter-final was the only tough game, where Spain took Sweden to overtime, but the Swedish girls prevailed 24-22. Then in the semi-final it was back to a big win, as the bronze medal team from the Netherlands was swept aside, 38-21.

The final rankings include one disappointing feature. The best non-European team was the home team from the Dominican Republic in 8th place, after an unexpectedly strong showing, but partly thanks to a favorable draw. The normal top teams from outside Europe here came in 9th (Korea), 10th (Angola) and 13th (Brazil). This is not a very promising outcome if one has the hope that the ‘non-Europeans’ might gradually catch up with the traditional powers from Europe. The only non-traditional participation at the end was that of the Iranian referees Mousavian/Taghavi in the final.

Favorites prevailing in Youth World Championship

The Women's Youth Championship is today moving into the final stage after the group play that started in the Dominican Republic a week ago. The event has been characterized by logistical problems but on the courts everything has looked normal in most respects. This includes the results so far.

From group A we saw Netherlands and Denmark move on to today's quarterfinals; while this was not so unexpected, perhaps it could be seen as a small surprise that the Netherlands won the group. (In combination with their strong showing in the Junior World Championship last month, it seems to suggest that the Netherlands has a new strong generation coming along on the women's side). Most observers will be confounded by the weak performance of the German team.

In the neighboring group, Norway did not meet much resistance until they played the host team from the Dominican Republic in the last match of the group play. So my prediction that the favorable seeding and draw of the host country team would see them through to the quarterfinals came true. Denmark and Norway are now playing in an intriguing quarterfinal match-up today. Netherland takes on the Dominican Republic.

In group B, Uruguay got the third place and next play Angola, even if up to the last minute the IHF seemed to misinterpret its own regulations and give that spot to Japan… German media were already discussing the suggested Germany-Uruguay match-up, which now correctly turns into a Germany-Japan pairing in the quest for 13th place.

Sweden was unexpectedly superior in group C, where it came down to the wire between France and Hungary for the other quarterfinal spot. Their game on the final day ended in a tie, with France moving on thanks to a better overall goal difference. In group C, the strongest one on paper, my suspicions were confirmed. Korea and Brazil tend to have to defend the honor of the non-Europeans in all women's events, but here they were unable to keep up with Russia and Spain.

So we now have interesting quarterfinals between Sweden and Spain, and between Russia and France, The perennial women's 'super powers' Korea and Hungary have to be content with fighting it out for 9th place. You can follow the results through the IHF web site: http://www.ihf.info/IHFCompetitions/WorldChampionships/WomensYouthWorldChampionships/WomensYouthWorldChampionship2010/FixturesandResults/tabid/5094/Default.aspx

World Championships for Women Junior and Youth

The [b]JUNIOR[/b] event finished today in Korea. The final stage was a first-rate one, with the battle for the medals taking place between the home team Korea, the women superpowers Norway and Russia, and the new sensation on the women’s side Montenegro. It is really remarkable how Montenegro is suddenly the dominant one among the former Yugoslav republics in the women’s competitions. As I have commented in recent time, their senior women’s team has been doing extremely well in EHF competition and will be a serious contender in the EURO 2010 later this year.

In the end, Korea was the team among the top four who failed to win a medal. After losing a semifinal to Russia (26-30) there was considerable hope that a bronze medal could be won as a consolation. But Montenegro, who had lost its semifinal to Norway with big numbers (16-26), bounced back and won the bronze match with the smallest of margins (24-23). The consolation for Korea is the unanimous praise they received as organizers. ‘The best ever’ was a common remark!

The final was won in superb style by Norway. After the convincing win in the semi-final, last year’s European champions just pulled away from 8-8 to 13-8, and then in the end the margin was nine goals for 30-21. For information regarding the All-Star team, see this: http://www.ihf.info//MediaCenter/News/NewsDetails/tabid/130/Default.aspx?ID=392 Top scorer was Nathalie Hagman from Sweden with a total of 75 goals.

In the placement matches, Hungary grabbed 5th by beating Netherlands 29-28 in a match between two teams that are normally strong in women’s handball. Germany won 7th place through 31-30 against a Swedish team that had come into the Main round with zero points, after having had the bad luck of contending with both Russia and Montenegro in the group play.

Apart from Korea, Brazil was the only other non-European team in the Main round where they finished last, i.e., in 12th place. This means that PanAmerica will be back down from four to the mandatory three teams as an allocation next time, two years from now. This must have been a bit frustrating, because a very strong performance by Brazil in the group play was followed by three straight defeats in the Main round.

The [b]YOUTH [/b]event will get underway on Monday in the Dominican Republic, who has the unenviable task as (relatively inexperienced) organizers to follow directly after Korea. We wish them good luck! Here the number of participants is 20 rather than 24, with the Europeans outnumbered 9 to 11.

On the A/B half, it would be a conservative guess that the perennial powers of Denmark, Norway, Germany and Netherlands will be able to do well, with perhaps Angola as a ‘dark horse’. The home team got, as is customary, a favorable seed and might be able to contend for a quarterfinal spot.

On the C/D half, there is likely to be a strong fight for the two top spots in one group among France, Hungary and Sweden. The other group seems to be the ‘group of death’, with Korea and Brazil defending the honor of the non-Europeans against Russia and Spain. I will not stick my neck out and predict the outcome of that group….