USATH releases IRS documentation: First glimpse of budget numbers

USA Team Handball (USATH) has formally released its Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 for 2008. This form, which is an annual requiremetn for all U.S. non-profit organization, details income and expenses from July 1st 2008 to June 30th 2009, and is the first window to the fiscal status of USATH. The following is an analysis of some key data points contained on the form.

Income (Donations): USATH President Dieter Esch has backed up his promise to support the organization with a donation of $305,000. This contribution accounted for over half of USATH’s income and the organization simply would not have functioned without it. Business partner and fellow board member Brad Krassner contributed $50,000 while a 3rd board member, John West contributed $10,000. Lacking, however, is a clear indication as to whether any of the other board members have contributed any or part of the $50,000 that is stated in Section 7.26 of the by-laws as a requirement for Board Members. The end date for the form 990 is June 30th of this year, so perhaps those contributions were made after that date.

Income (Dues): USATH collected $41,117 in membership dues. This is similar to the total amount collected by the previous administration according to its last available Form 990 in 2004. As there was a significant increase in the price for annual dues, one can infer that there are now actually fewer members. It’s not surprising, however, that the new Federation would start with a low ground floor. It should be interesting to see how this metric tracks in the years to come, though, as it is a fairly reliable metric of the sports growth.

Membership dues revenue from previous IRS Form 990s
2004 $37k
2003 $42k
2002 $59K
2001 $26K
2000 $42K
(Note: I would speculate that the lower revenue in 2001 and the higher revenue in 2002 are due to some anomaly related to when the dues were collected. On average, the yearly revenue tracks closely to $40,000)

Expenses (Salaries): The USATH spent $285,279 on employee salaries and this is easily the largest expenditure of the Federation. The IRS also requires that all employees receiving compensation over $100,000 be listed by name and the General Manager of USATH, Steve Pastorino tops that mark with an overall compensation listed as $108,000. (Mr Pastorino has informed me that the yearly compensation is actually $100,000 and the extra $8,000 is due to 13 months of income). Extrapolating salaries for the other administrative personnel is difficult as several staff members were employed for only part of the year.

There are very few items of information more personal than how much money one earns in a year and in many businesses such information is held very close to the vest. U.S. non-profits, however, have stringent transparency requirements and with ready access to the internet this information is now available for all to see.

There’s a number of different ways to assess the appropriateness of the General Manager’s salary and everyone’s viewpoint is going to be influenced to some extent by their own professional experiences. Perhaps one of the more relevant comparisons is the compensation that Mike Cavanaugh received ($65,000/year) as the Executive Director back in 2004. Using a 4% inflation rate this would equate to a $73,000 salary for 2008; $100,000 equates to about a 37% pay increase. Using just those 2 data points one could come to the conclusion that either Mike Cavanaugh was undercompensated, Steve Pastorino is being overcompensated, or perhaps a mixture of both. (As a side note Mike Cavanaugh is listed as earning $24,917 in CY2008 as the new CEO of USA Table Tennis. This is, however, only for an indeterminate portion of that year. You’ll have to wait until next year to see what he makes now on an annual basis)

Out of curiosity I checked a few other sports federations to see what the top earner made. All federations are not created equal, but these numbers, inflation adjusted to 2008, do provide some insight.

USA Team Handball
Total income: $541,701
Top Salary: $100,000

Ultimate (Frisbee)
Total income: $1,236,000
Top Salary: $76,752

USA Water Polo
Total income: $4,703,000
Top Salary: $238,160

USA Field Hockey
Total income: $5,900,000
Top Salary: $263,120

USA Rugby
Total Income: $7,128,000
Top Salary: $271,000

USA Lacrosse
Total Income: $10,369,000
Top Salary: $173,000

If you compare handball to these sports, you’ll note that Mr Pastorino’s salary is substantially less with the exception of Ultimate. There are several ways to look at this.
– Salary as a ratio to total income: It can be argued that someone managing more money has greater responsibility and therefore should earn more. Using this argument Mr Pastorino’s salary is actually tops at 17% of total revenue.
– Salary requirement as an Olympic sport: The case can be made that Handball needs a base salary that is in line with the inherent prestige of other Olympic sports. In other words, if you’re going to take the sport seriously you need to have a salary comparable to other sports. Using this measure, Handball falls short of the mark.
– Salary requirement as it relates to the difficulty of the task. Anybody familiar with the challenges a minor sport like Handball faces knows full well the level of difficulty involved. A good case can be made that you don’t need just any manager, you need a super star with a proven track record of successful turnarounds. Handball probably falls short of the mark here as well and you could also bet that some top managers wouldn’t take the position at any salary, because they know that it will be tough to be successful. I’d love to put the head of USA basketball in charge of USA Handball and see how well that individual does in a more challenging situation.

In the end, there’s no automatic calculator that can decide what the appropriate compensation should be. It’s maybe a little more than I would have thought, but it’s in the ballpark. The bottom line is that the salary decision was Dieter Esch’s and since he contributed $305,000 to the organization one can only assume it was a decision that he was comfortable with.

Other Expenses: The Federal Statement at the end of the package identifies $168,975 in other expenses. This section is a hodgepodge of different expenses, but 3 items are worth noting:
Travel: $65,754
National Team Expenses: $7,071
USA Club Competition Expenses: $36,058

It’s hard to imagine Travel and National Team Expenses remaining so low in the future. For the time frame indicated there was only limited activity in those areas and these are sure to increase substantially in future statements. USA club competition expenses are probably in line with the costs of conducting a National Championship tournament. It will be interesting to track this in the years to come. Also as more training camps and other development activities are conducted I hope that future documentation highlights the spending in these areas more clearly.

The overall numbers: $540,000 to run a national federation is going to result in a shoestring operation. It’s hardly enough revenue to do a few things well, let alone enough to do everything that needs to be done. This number has got to get larger and USA Team Handball is working diligently to make that happen through engagement with international entities and the USOC. We can and should expect this bottom line number to increase from year to year so that it approaches the funding of some of the other sports organization listed above.

Closing thoughts: These numbers don’t tell the full story, but do set some initial benchmarks. I have had some limited dialogue with Steve Pastorino on these topics as well as opportunity to review a rough draft of planning documents that look towards the future. Hopefully, this information will be posted soon to the USA Team Handball website and will provide better insight as to the fiscal health and planning envisioned.

Full disclosure: I sent Dieter Esch an unsolicited letter expressing interest in the USA Team Handball General Manager position shortly after USA Team Handball was certified by the USOC in 2008. I was never interviewed and it’s probably unlikely that I would have accepted employment due to a number of personal and professional considerations. I’m also not surprised that Mr Esch hired someone he knew with a sports management background and very importantly no ties to the fractious politics that have afflicted the sport in the U.S. I think that my commentaries on USA Team Handball are fair and backed with reasoned arguments, but readers will have to judge for themselves as to whether my previous interest in employment clouds my critiques.

USA Team Handball Form 990 (1998): http://usateamhandball.org/assets/documents/attached_file/filename/20855/2008_USA_Team_Handball_Form_990.pdf
Guidestar: www.guidestar.org (Free service which provides access to IRS Form 990s for all U.S. Non-Profits)

2010 African Championships Underway

The Men’s and Women’s African Handball Championships started today in Egypt. The men’s competition consists of 12 teams and is divided into 3 groups. The Women’s competition features 8 teams divided into 2 groups. Three teams from each competition will qualify for the 2011 World Championships.

In the Men’s tournament Egypt and Tunisia will be favored to qualify, while a number of teams will be contenders for the 3rd spot. In the Women’s tournament Angola will be expected to dominate while the other teams will scramble for the 2nd and 3rd spots.

As a side note, Algeria’s delegation was given a warm welcome upon their arrival in Cairo. Security concerns as a result of riots following a soccer World Cup Qualifier between the two rivals had prompted Egypt to initially withdraw from hosting the tournament. This Egypthandball.com report includes photos showing that they were greeted with flowers: http://www.egypthandball.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=739:2010-02-11-02-23-54&catid=932:egypt&Itemid=67

THN (6 Dec 09): Egypt reverses decision: Will host African Championships after all: https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.898

African Handball Championships Official Website: http://www.handball2010.com/2010/index.php?pg=hb5

Results for Thursday, 11 February

Men

Group A (Suez)
Democratic Republic of Congo – Nigeria 27-27
Tunisia – Libya 43-24

Group B (Cairo)
Angola – Cameroon 25-22
Egypt – Gabon 27-21

Group C (Cairo)
Algeria – Cote d’Ivoire 29-11
Morocco – Congo 27-24

Women

Group A (Cairo)
Cote d’Ivoire – Algeria 22-19
Tunisia – Cameroon 25-19

Group B (Suez)
Congo – Democratic Republic of Congo 37-31
Angola – Egypt 32-21

Asian Championship: Preliminary round completed

The last two days of the group play offered, as expected, some excitement in important games between evenly matched teams. The results were:

Gr. A Saudi Arabia-China 20-22
Gr. D Iran-Lebanon 25-16
Gr. B Japan-Bahrain 31-27
Gr. C Korea-Qatar 29-23

This means that China failed to qualify for the main round, but it was really close. China needed to win by 4 goals and had a 3-goal lead close to the end, but that was as close as it got. The new Chinese team will now have more time to gain experience in time for future events. In the meantime, Syria (as group winner) and Saudi Arabia are in the main round.

Iran gained a rather comfortable victory against Lebanon. The home team again got good crowd support, but they were simply a bit too thin in comparison with a more solid and experienced adversary. But Lebanon is still in the main round as a runner-up, after the earlier victory against Jordan.

The young Japanese team now played a more convincing game against the Bahrainis, who are never an easy opponent. However, both teams could play without nerves, as they had both beaten the Iraqi team earlier. Japan is now the group winner.

Today’s drama came in the Korea-Qatar encounter. It was one of those awkward situations, where one team (U.A.E.) can just sit and watch, hoping for the best. And conversely, one could say that Korea had the fate of both teams in their hands, after having previously beaten U.A.E. with 30-23. As the Qatar-U.A.E. game ended in a tie, precisely 30-23 was now a pivotal result in today’s game, as this would have made it necessary to resort to a coin toss for the final main round place. And it came close, as Korea’s lead oscillated between 6 and 9 goals. But the final result was 29-23. Surely a somewhat bitter ending for the U.A.E, but at least the coin toss was avoided…

The main round starts on Saturday and goes on for three days with round-robin play in the following two groups; the best two in each group advance to the semifinals, with a chance for the three slots in the 2011 World Championship. One could say that this is where the Championship really starts:

Gr. A: Iran, Japan, Qatar and Saudi Arabia
Gr. B: Korea, Syria, Lebanon and Bahrain

The ‘consolation matches’ include China-U.A.E on Sunday and Iraq-Jordan on Monday; the winners later play for 9th place and the losers for 11th place.

IOC President Rogge comments on Moustafa's contract with Sportfive

In an in-depth interview published in Neue Zuercher Zeitung today, two days prior to the opening of the Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver, IOC President Jacques Rogge anwers a broad spectrum of questions, many of a political nature or related to the role and responsibilities of the IOC. http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/kultur/film/wir_koennen_nicht_alle_probleme_dieser_welt_loesen_1.4892027.html

In this interview, the IOC President is asked very specifically about his views on the recently reported https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.933 revelation that IHF president Moustafa had a lucrative personal contract with Sportfive, at the same time as this company had acquired the TV rights for all IHF events.

At first, the IOC President attempts to avoid the question, by saying that "Moustafa is not an IOC member; therefore it is not up to us to take any measures.' However, when the interviewer follows up with a hypothetical question, "but what if Moustafa had been an IOC member?". [u]The answer from the IOC President is very clear: "In that case I surely would not tolerate such a behavior."[/u] It should be noted that this is in sharp contrast with Moustafa's defense that he had sought clearance from the IOC Ethics Commission.

And just what problems does the IHF have (or anticipate) with CAS?

A puzzling article suddenly appeared on the IHF web site a couple of days ago. http://www.ihf.info/front_content.php?idcat=57&idart=2553 It came ‘out of the blue’ and it would be interesting to know what the IHF (read: its president) believes it has at stake here. It is stated that the IHF met with representatives of other international federations (IFs) for team sports, and that these (or all?) IFs have joined together, in collaboration with the IOC (!!) to express its concerns with/to CAS (the Court of Arbitration in Sports) in a formal letter.

It was claimed that ‘more and more decisions of Executive Committees and Congresses of IFs are appealed to CAS,’ and it was argued in the letter to CAS that “such appeals obviously undermine the authority of the IFs”. Superficially, such concerns may seem legitimate but, if one is familiar with the background, then they may seem rather farfetched and either laughable or scary, depending on how one wants to interpret the claims.

CAS was established in 1983, at the initiative of the then IOC president Samaranch, as a specialized body to resolve disputes involving issues such as eligibility, sports governance and doping, outside the normal court system. It plays a particular in role relation to issues regarding the Olympic Games. For the most part, the issues that come before the CAS are handled in ways similar to those of normal court cases, with written submissions, hearings, and a careful review of applicable laws and regulations. Most cases heard by CAS take the form of appeals, after the normal appeals mechanisms within an IF have been exhausted, but CAS also handles mediation cases and provides advice upon request. The web site of CAS offers a wealth of information about its rules and its operations. http://www.tas-cas.org/news

As far as the IHF is concerned, the experience with CAS is limited to one case only, but an absolutely infamous one, viz., the scandalous manipulations in the Asian qualification tournaments for the 2008 Olympics in Beijing. Here the IHF Council found it necessary to set aside the results of both the men’s and the women’s events due to clear indications of an orchestration of heavily biased refereeing and other forms of fraudulent behavior. The IHF decision was appealed by the Asian Federation and the nations that had ‘won’ the events that the IHF decided to annul. The IHF president then took upon himself, in collaboration with the Asian president, to bring the matter straight to CAS for resolution, even though the internal IHF appeals mechanisms had not been used. In other words, it was the IHF specifically asking CAS to become involved, and anything else would have been impossible under the CAS statutes. Then it is a different matter that the revelations during the CAS proceedings ended up being most embarrassing for the IHF president… THN report at the time: https://teamhandballnews.com/comment-n380.html the complete text of the CAS decision: http://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/sites/CaseLaw/Shared%20Documents/1483.pdf

FIFA’s experience with CAS is a bit more extensive. Perhaps the most awkward case, from FIFA’s vantage point, involves the issue of releasing players under the age of 23 for the 2008 Olympics. Some clubs, for instance FC Barcelona in the case of Messi, refused to release their player. FIFA got up on ‘high horses’, referring partly to a Committee decision and partly to ‘well-established practices’. CAS, however, did not accept the validity of the FIFA committee decision, and simply noted that the ‘well-established practices’ could not be seen as prevailing inasmuch as they directly contradicted relevant clauses in FIFA’s own regulations. This was at the time a rather embarrassing defeat for the FIFA and its president Blaetter. Moreover, it is well known that FIFA, possibly even more strongly than the IOC, constantly asserts its autonomy and lashes out against member countries with accusations and punishments regarding government interference in matters of federations and clubs. Clearly, FIFA must be just as unhappy with any notion that CAS might be inclined to question FIFA decisions and intervene in its decision-making.

But comparatively, it is absolutely astounding, if it is indeed correct, that IOC is now also expressing concerns about the role of CAS. As noted at the outset, CAS exists at the initiative of IOC, and the concerns in the early days were just the opposite of what now is being alleged. CAS was seen as too closely linked to IOC and therefore had its credibility and impartiality questioned. Decisions had to be taken, especially regarding financing and administration, which demonstrated a higher degree of independence. Even so, CAS was earlier often accused of being rather reticent in its role. So it would be a truly remarkable turnaround if the IOC now was seen as accusing CAS of being excessively active and involved.

Let me go back to the question of possible reasons for the IHF to participate in action against CAS, and in fact being the only team sport IF currently even mentioning the issue in public. It might be a sufficient reason to support initiatives that are close to the heart of the ‘role model’ FIFA/Blaetter (a very unfortunate choice, but nevertheless), and it might be ‘politically correct’ to support action that is said to be embraced by the IOC. (See also the recent IHF decision to suspend Kuwaiti handball http://www.ihf.info/front_content.php?idcat=57&idart=2424 ).

But the precise issue that saw FIFA overruled by CAS may also provide a hint. IHF has recently asserted its position (as reflected in its Transfer Regulations) that clubs worldwide must accept to release, without compensation, players for World Championships. This IHF position is already being appealed in civilian courts and the European Union. Could IHF be concerned about getting also CAS as an adversary in such matters? But this seems highly unrealistic, as CAS does not have the mandate to get involved in setting aside existing IHF regulations. Is it instead just an effort to try to eliminate one of the few existing forms of external scrutiny, in matters where the IHF does [u]not[/u] wish to follow its regulations or where it does not want it autonomy/autocracy challenged!!??

Asian Championship: Picture for Main Round getting clearer

Each group has 3 teams, and 2 of the 3 matches in each group have now been played. The Monday and Tuesday results were:

Gr. A Syria – China 28 – 21 (14 – 9)
Gr. D Iran – Jordan 39 – 23 (19 – 12)
Gr. B Iraq – Bahrain 19 – 30 (7 – 17)
Gr. C U.A.E. – Qatar 25 – 25 (12 – 12)

The win for Syria may seem surprising, but there is an explanation: China came with a new, young team; very tall and athletic players, but clearly without much handball experience. It is too early to how much talent they have for the longer term, but more immediately it means that [u]China needs to defeat Saudi Arabia with at least 4 goals on Wednesday[/u] to avoid being eliminated. If they do no manage this, then the Saudi team will advance together with Syria. But at least it seems clear now that Syria is not a pushover.

Jordan became the first team to be eliminated after two straight defeats. Iran, with a new Russian coach replacing the previous one, had no difficulties in this game. What now remains to be seen is who will be the winner of the group, and thus higher seeded in the main round, after [u]the game between Iran and the home team Lebanon on Wednesday[/u]. Perhaps the spectators, who have been largely missing since the opening day, will now be back to create some crowd support and inspiration for their favorites.

Iraq today became the second team eliminated after the loss against Bahrain. The game was decided quite early, and Bahrain did not need to show full capacity. But this also means that it is difficult to have a clear sense for [u]what might happen in the game Japan-Bahrain on Thursday[/u]. Both teams will be in the main round, but who will be the group winner and seeded higher in the main round groups next week?

The rivalry between U.A.E. and Qatar had been expected to offer a close and exciting game, and the teams matched the expectations. It was tied at half-time and tied at the final whistle. The game was quite rough, with 2 ‘red cards’ and 18 suspensions. The referees from Iran, the most experienced couple of Asia, had their hands full. The team from U.A.E. now finds itself in the unusual position of having to cheer for Korea [u]on Thursday. U.A.E. will be out, unless Qatar loses by 7 or more against Korea[/u]. But perhaps the Qatari will be able to recharge the batteries quickly and surprise the Koreans…

Intriguing ‘power play’ regarding competition calendar and related issues

European web sites today report about interesting developments on several fronts. One of the hottest topics involves the competition calendar for the elite level and related aspects regarding the rights of players, clubs, national federations and the IHF/EHF. Clearly, both the IHF and the EHF are attempting to grab the initiative by organizing meetings with representatives of other stakeholders. Just recently, as reported by THN, https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.932 the IHF got a ‘working group’ together for a meeting in Vienna during the EURO2010. As we also reported some time ago, https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.881 the EHF will want to continue its efforts to create a forum for discussions about changes in the structure of European handball. A meeting will now take place at the end of this week.

In the IHF meeting, participants were handpicked, and Group Club Handball (GCH), the entity representing 19 top clubs in Europe was specifically excluded, not just quietly but with a slap in the face, in the form of a statement that IHF does not meet with entities that have no formal link to the IHF. Apparently, the EHF does not have similar concerns, as GCH is likely to play a key role in the upcoming EHF forum. This may be one reason why the GCH now reports, on its own web site, http://www.groupclubhandball.com/?p=636 that a formal legal complaint that was lodged almost a year ago by GCH against IHF and EHF challenging their ‘monopoly’, may now be split up into two separate complaints. The purpose of this move would be to suspend temporarily the complaint against EHF, while the complaint against IHF remains in place. Clearly, the directions that the upcoming EHF meeting will take, will be crucial for the atmosphere on the European scene.

Right at this point in time, the President of the German Handball Federation, Ulrich Strombach, who has tended to be an ally of IHF president Moustafa, went out on a limb in an interview (as also reported, inter alia, on the GCH web site) http://www.groupclubhandball.com/?p=636 with a series of ‘demands’. He wanted to see: a reduction of the number of teams in the German Bundesliga; a reduction of teams in the EHF Champions League; a re-scheduling of World and European Championships to the summer months; an abolition of the European Championship in Olympic years; and finally, a larger share of the IHF revenue for the national federations. At first sight, this list seems tilted in favor of the IHF, away from the EHF, as the critical question of reducing ‘from five to four’ big events in each four-year period is answered by removing one European Championship. However, much of the focus of federations and clubs has been on revenue-sharing and compensation for the time spent by players on their national teams, so the monetary side may weigh heavily.

One can only hope that the upcoming meeting will be a productive next step. It would also seem that, while the issues and the stakeholders by definition differ somewhat, the IHF and the EHF should have far more in common in this whole process than they have been able to demonstrate so far. Competing initiatives and actions colored by prestige are not likely to be helpful. Also, there is that lingering concern about an exclusive focus on men’s handball and a reluctance to give player representatives a seat at the table.

Asian Championship underway without surprises or incidents

During the first two days, with a total of four games, the Championship got off to a good start, with a peaceful atmosphere and in a general spirit of sportsmanship. Some teams played a bit rougher on defense than the others, but nothing extraordinary. With one exception, the games were also rather one-sided. The results were:

Gr. A Saudi Arabia – Syria 23:22 (12:9)
Gr. D Lebanon – Jordan 34:21 (14:9)
Gr. B Japan – Iraq 35-21 (19:13)
Gr. C Korea – U.A.E. 30-23 (13-12)

The Saudi team did not make the same strong impression as two years ago, and had to struggle to overcome a strong resistance from the Syrian team. It was not decided until the final seconds. It will now be interesting to see how the Chinese team compares with these two combatants.

The home team was supported by a crowd of around 2,000, including many dignitaries. The game was not played at a very high level, and the result says more about the weakness of the team from Jordan. Iran remains a clear favorite in this group, but the home team appears to have secured a spot in the main round.

Japan literally ran away from an inexperienced Iraqi team. The outcome became clear quite early in the game, even if the Japanese did not show an entirely convincing form yet. This suggests that Bahrain should also be able to get through to the next phase.

The Korean team was in for more of a battle than perhaps had been expected. In the second half, however, the Koreans, who came with a new coach and many young players, were able to pull away and win rather comfortably.

The Monday games are: Syria-China and Iran-Jordan;
On Tuesday we will see: Iraq-Bahrain and the friendly neighbors U.A.E.-Qatar

South Asian Games Handball: Final Results

The Men's Handball tournament at the South Asian Games concluded on Saturday with Pakistan defeating archrival India, 37-31 for the gold medal. Pakistan and India were the two class teams of the tournament as no other side came closer than 12 goals to those two sides. Bangladesh beat Nepal for the bronze.

News reports indicate that this was the first time that Handball was included in the South Asian Games which is a multi sport competition for nations on or near the Indian subcontinent: Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, Sri Lanka. In addition to the four nations previously mention Afghanistan and Sri Lanka also sent teams. News reports indicate the that the matches were played in an outdoor stadium with a packed house witnessing the final.

Editor’s Note: I would like to do a feature article on Handball in South Asia. If you are a handball player or administrator in any of the countries mentioned please contact me at john.ryan@teamhandballnews.com.

Asian Games Website Handball page: http://rubaisport.com/sag/?competition=handball
Dawn.com (6 Feb 10): Pakistan edge India to win handball gold in SAG: http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/sport/08-pakistan-edge-india-to-win-handball-gold-in-sag-ts-05

Great Britain Men’s Update

This past December and January the Great Britain (GB) Men’s team played 13 matches against club and national teams in 4 different events. The culmination of the tour was an official World Championship qualifying tournament in Finland. GB lost all 13 matches, but showed significant progress through nearly a month of practice and serious competition. GB also did not have their full complement of players for some of the matches and lost their team Captain and Center Back, Ciaran Williams, to injury in the first tournament.

In June, the GB men will have the opportunity to host their first international tournament as they will host Estonia, Cyprus and Bulgaria in the first round of qualification for the 2012 European Championships. The winner of this tournament will advance to the second round of qualification where they will play home and away matches against the top teams in Europe.

The British Federation website has a trove of information on their trip including video interviews with their coach, Dragan Djukic, their performance director, Lorraine Brown and players at the qualifiers in Finland. Additionally, BBC did a video report on the event as well.

Commentary: The bottom line results are fairly stark as GB lost all 13 matches and they clearly have a long way to go towards their goal of being competitive at the 2012 Olympics. The margins of defeat varied from 3 goals against one of the weaker club sides in Norway’s top league to a 25 point drubbing by Bosnia & Herzegovina. Still even in a massive loss like the one against Bosnia there are signs of progress as the margin was a more respectable 17-12 at the halftime break. In their interviews the coach and director, acknowledge the shortcomings and the long road ahead. Compared to the women’s team, the men’s team is currently a notch or two behind in terms of where they stand relative to the rest of Europe. The next big test will be the qualification tournament in June. As host, they should have a good performance. The other sides are all part of Europe’s lowest tier of handball and qualifying will show a marked sign of progress.

British Federation website: http://britishhandball.worldhandball.com/
GB Federation (31 Jan 10): GB to Host Euro 2012 Matches: http://fastbreak-handballnews.blogspot.com/2010/01/gb-to-host-euro-2012-matches.html
Huw Goodwin Blog (26 Jan 10): Lessons learned…: http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A62376456
VIDEO: BBC Sport (17 Jan 10) Great Britain handballers edged out by Finland: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/handball/8464341.stm

Match Results:

Limburgse Handbaldagen Tournament (Netherlands): http://www.lhd.nl/
27 Dec: K Sports (KOR/JAP) – GBR 29-20 (17-10)
27 Dec: Vos Invesments Lions (NLD) – GBR 39-23 (17-11) (Currently 4th in Netherlands league (10-2-5))
28 Dec: Põlva Serviti (EST) – GBR 36-26 (17-11) (Currently 1st in top Estonian league)
29 Dec: Haugaland HK (NOR) – GBR 29-26 (Currently in 11th place (2-1-9) in top Norwegian League)

Yellow Cup (Winterthur, Switzerland): http://www.yellow-winterthur.ch/index.php?id=317
2 Jan: Switzerland – GBR 33-18 (12-10)
3 Jan: Tunisia – GBR 42-24 (21-14)
4 Jan: Netherlands – GBR 39-21 (16-10)
VIDEO: Swiss news report on GBR- Switzerland match: British coach, Dragan Djukic, is a former coach of the Swiss National Team: http://videoportal.sf.tv/video?id=0cfa6737-98be-4896-85db-db7fad227b0b

Le Marrane Tournament (France) http://www.lemarrane.fr/calendrier/#boucle
8 Jan: Tunisia – GBR 33 – 23 (16-11)
9 Jan: Qatar – GBR 38-26 (20-10)
10 Jan: Czech Republic 32-22 (17-14)

2011 WC Qualifying Group Play: http://www.eurohandball.com/wch/men/2011/round/3/Qualification+Europe
15 Jan: Romania – GBR 36-27 (23-11)
16 Jan: Bosnia & Herzegovina – GBR 44-19 (17-12)
17 Jan: Finland – GBR 35-21 (17-13)

Asian Men’s Championship starting on Saturday

Beirut is hosting this event that gets underway on Saturday and will go on for two entire weeks. Twelve games in six days is the modest pace during the preliminary round. Following, the suspension of the Kuwait Olympic Committee and then also the Kuwait Handball Federation, as discussed more in detail in a recent article, https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.921 the groups are as follows: A: Saudi Arabia, China, Syria; B: Japan, Bahrain, Iraq; C: Rep. of Korea, Qatar, United Arab Emirates; and D: Iran, Lebanon, Jordan.

There has been speculation that Kuwait might be reinstated up to the very last moment. The Kuwaiti government has been in a position to take the legislative measures that would satisfy the IOC, but apparently this has not been feasible. As discussed previously, there was also the question as to whether the IHF had actually been [u]forced[/u] by the IOC to suspend Kuwaiti handball, or whether this was a [u]voluntary[/u] action. Mysteriously, the IOC keeps being very cryptic. They refrain from answering this question, and simply say that the individual sports ‘were informed’ about the reasons for the IOC suspension and that then, as of this moment, eight out of 20 sports federations, among them the IHF, have suspended Kuwait in their respective sports, while 12 have not followed the lead of the IOC. Perhaps we will obtain clarity at some point.

In the absence of Kuwait, the groups now look fairly balanced, and the competition for the three qualifying spots for the 2011 World Championships may be more open than it seemed before. Most of our sources in Asia are ready to believe that Korea and Iran will be strongest teams on their half of the draw, with good chances to qualify, but Qatar should never be underestimated. They have made good progress in recent years. The other half may be more difficult to predict. China is likely to have benefited from its Olympic experience. Japan and Bahrain can always be expected do well, but both of them tend to be a bit unpredictable. Perhaps Saudi Arabia should be seen as the ‘dark horse’.

As noted in an earlier article, https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.916 the main thing this time is really the expectation of fair and honest competition. On many previous occasions, this was not the case. There are too many sad examples to mention here, but one of the more conspicuous ones is explained in the following THN article from the 2008 championship, incl. a YouTube video clip: https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.477 Asia needs to shape up its handball image, in the same way as the quality of the teams has kept improving. THN intends to follow the event closely and hopes to be able to provide occasional reports.

LA Team Handball wins Cal Cup Tournament

This past weekend LA Team Handball defeated Cal Heat 26-22 in the final to win the Cal Cup. This avenged an earlier 22-19 loss in pool play. This is the first time a club other than Cal Heat has won the tournament since 2006. Six teams participated in the tournament including international participants from Japan and Canada.

More detail on the tournament is available at the Cal Heat website: http://www.calheat.com/dr/node/197

Euro 2010: Final Thoughts

Prediction Hits and Misses
– Hit: My prediction that Germany would be a disappointment came to fruition. They lacked firepower and barely made it out of the preliminary round. Coach Brand didn’t explicitly complain about the Bundesliga, but give him time: http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,,5176503,00.html
– Hit/miss: I predicted a combination of angst and complacency would prevent France from winning the title. I was correct about the angst and complacency, but was dead wrong on the timing. France slept walk through its first three matches, (29-29 draw vs. Hungary , a narrow 21-20 victory over the Czech Republic, and a 24-24 draw vs. Spain), but then turned up the heat in the Main Round and the semifinals. Had they been able to win their first matches on reputation without a wakeup call they would have been ripe for an upset. Credit this to good fortune, parity, the ability turn the switch on when needed, or to a clever psychological strategy from the coaching staff. Or maybe all of the above.
– Miss: Russia was certainly not a surprise team. They continue to disappoint as they prove again to be a “reverse Iceland”. (i.e., Iceland proved that the team can add up to more than its individual parts. The Russians have been proving that the individual parts can add up to less than the whole). Perhaps it’s time for a new coach to reenergize their program.

Balic Theater: Christer Ahl didn’t name names when he referred to star players taking advantage of their status to secure two minute penalties, but as it’s Oscar season, I will nominate Ivano Balic for best actor. Actually, they could spice up the ESPYs by adding this category to the award show. They could show clips of soccer players taking a dive, handball players writhing in agony on the court and basketball players stumbling to the ground after a clean block before they announce the winner.

Parity: The Euro 2010 brought new meaning to the word parity as almost every game was competitive till the end of the match. Heck, eventual winners France drew with Hungary and they were eliminated in the preliminary round. Contrast that to a World Championship where only a few non-European teams are competitive and it’s easy to understand why there have been calls to modify the WC format.

How long will the dynasty last?: Winning 3 straight titles cannot be attributed to luck. Make no mistake, we are in the midst of a French Handball dynasty. The only question remains is how long will it last? With several key players in their 20’s and no player older than 34, France show no signs of slowing down. With the additional fact that no team is on the cusp of improving to their level, I’m thinking that a double-triple is a very real possibility. This would mean 3 more titles (WC 2011, EC 2012, Olympics 2012) to go with their current 3. After London, though, the French will likely see a few key retirements in the backcourt. Couple those retirements with the rest of the players aging and no readily identifiable replacements and the dynasty will be over. In the mean time though, the question before each tournament will continue to be, “Can anybody stop France?”