post

Ciudad Real Madrid: can that be for real??

A Real Dilemma

It is not exactly a secret that the overall economic situation in Spain is very shaky.  The country has allowed itself to live above its means for quite some time (just like in so many other countries, including the U.S.) so the situation is simply not sustainable.  Budgets have to be tightened, expenditures have to be reduced, and loans cannot easily be had.  In this context, spending money on ‘luxuries’ such as sports at the elite level, or on expensive forms of art and culture, is no longer so easy. 

So not long after we celebrated Barcelona’s Champions League successes in football and handball, together with top performances also by Real Madrid in football and Ciudad Real in handball, doomsday prophecies are beginning to be heard.   Of course, these top clubs may be the ones who can hold out the longest, whereas the smaller, less resourceful clubs are the ones who already feel the budget crunch.

It is almost too easy to find reports in Spanish media about handball clubs in the top league ASOBAL who have not been able to pay their players for several months and have debts to tune of a couple of million Euros.  Some clubs have been given an ultimatum and a deadline;  unless the debts are paid off, the clubs will be forced to move down from the top division.  This includes, among others, the traditional top club Granollers, which was the positive surprise of the past season, at least in terms of game performances.

There is not exactly a line of clubs waiting to take up positions that may become vacant.  Both the clubs that were relegated and those who narrowly failed to gain promotion seem unable to meet the requirements for a season at the top level.   In any event, some experts suggest that a consolidation into a smaller top division might be the healthiest approach in any case.

So what about the two top clubs, Barcelona and Ciudad Real?  One might not be ready to believe that Barcelona would have any financial problems.  But attracting the players needed to form such a strong team is an expensive affair, so the football section of the club incurred major losses.  There is now a decision that the previously generous support for other sports, such as handball, will suffer a major cut-back.   What this might mean for the handball team’s ability to retain and recruit star players is uncertain. 

But the situation seems even more acute for Ciudad Real.  This club is all about handball.  And it is a club from a small town with a very modest basis for a team at the international top level.  (Some people have mistakenly thought that it is a Madrid club, but Ciudad Real is a town of about 75.000 inhabitants, located 200km south of Madrid).  It has a rich history and was once prominent, but that was a few hundred years ago.  And its most famous personality, together with the club’s owner Domingo Diaz de Mera, is none other than Don Quixote…!  And now it has become known that the clubs totally dominant sponsor is backing out.

While some might think that this just means that Diaz de Mera will have to thrown in more of his own money, these days seem to be over.  In fact, there are instead reports about a merger with some well-known football club, initially Atletico Madrid.   And then suddenly there are indications that the football archrival in the capital, Real Madrid might also be interested.  Real already has a strong basketball section in addition to the football team.  Perhaps it seems that a club from Ciudad Real fits in better with Real than Atletico Madrid.  (As it happens, the football training facilities for Real Madrid are named precisely Ciudad Real Madrid…)

It will be interesting to follow these developments.  It may be that both Barcelona and Ciudad Real will be able to survive as the dominant handball clubs of Spain in some form.  But being dominant in a much shakier ASOBAL may no longer be such a good environment, and it may not translate into remaining dominant by European standards.  One topic of speculation, with different opinions attached, is that at least the ability to recruit well-known players from other countries may be substantially reduced.  While this may initially lower the quality, it would mean a major increase in opportunities for young Spanish players.  The beneficiary might then be the Spanish national team, and Heiner Brand’s concerns and ideas regarding Germany may end up being tested in Spain.  We will see how it all develops!

post

Icelandic handball still going strong

The real border line between America and Europe??

I am just back from a week of sightseeing on Iceland, but I also managed to fit in a handball game, namely the final European qualifying game between Iceland and Austria.  Moreover, I had the opportunity to meet with some of my old handball friends.

The game rather quickly became a bit anticlimactic.  Iceland needed to win the game in order to qualify, so there were some nerves involved prior to the game.  But soon it became clear that Iceland had regained some of that fighting spirit that seemed missing in the World Championship earlier this year.  Their defensive play, including the goalkeeping, was really solid and the Austrians became increasingly desperate.  The Icelandic team also managed to use their own chances very efficiently, so the final result 44-29 really reflected the action quite well.  The Reykjavik handball arena is rather small, with room for only 2500-3000 spectators; but a different way to look at it is that one percent of the entire population of the country was there to watch the game and cheer on their favorites frantically.

Iceland relied mostly on their experienced players.  Thirteen of the players from the World Championship were on the team, most of them at age 30 or above.  Only goalkeeper Bjorgvin Gustavsson (25) and Aron Palmarsson (20) have yet to acquire veteran status.  Three younger players who are still playing for Icelandic clubs had also been added to the squad, and they got a chance to get out on the court in the final minutes.

More generally, my Icelandic friends described a situation where the flow of new, young talents continues undiminished.  The ‘U-21’ team narrowly lost in their World Championship qualifying, having to play Serbia at their home court.  And the Icelandic league continues to remain competitive, at least among the top 4-6 teams, despite the fact that no less than almost 60 men’s players are enrolled in clubs abroad, with about half of them in Germany. 

I pointedly noted that we are seeing talented Icelandic athletes joining American universities on basketball scholarships;  does this in any way suggested that handball is losing its dominating position in Iceland?  My friends, who are obviously a bit biased, offered a somewhat joking explanation:  if a young talent absolutely wants to study in the U.S., then they reluctantly have to choose basketball;  or else the explanation is that they realize that they simply do not have the talent to make it to the top in handball…

The men’s champion of the 2010-11 season in Iceland was FH (from the Reykjavik suburb of Hafnarfjordur) who beat Akureyri (from the North Coast) with 3 games to 1 in the play-off finals, thus reversing the positions from the regular season.  FH will now participate in the qualifying round of the EHF Champions League.  The other two teams in the play-offs was the Reykjavik club Fram and HK Kopavogur.  The traditionally strong clubs Haukar and Valur finished next in line.

By the way, veterans Olafur Stefansson and Gudjon Sigurdsson are moving from Rhein-Neckar Lowen to AG Copenhagen for 2011-12, a move that has upset the Germans and has highlighted the complications arising from the fact that both clubs have the same Danish owner.  On the other hand, goalie Gustavsson is moving from Switzerland to Magdeburg.

Further to the remarkable feat of Icelandic handball to place so many players in top clubs abroad, one should also remember how many top coaches are working in exile.  Gudmundur Gudmundsson, Alfred Gislason and Dagur Sigurdsson may be the most prominent names due their work with top clubs in the Bundesliga, but one should also mention Thorir Hergeirsson who is in charge of the strong women’s national team in Norway.  In total, about 15 Icelandic coaches are active abroad.  By the way, I got some informal comments that the EHF punishment of Gislason had fallen well short of what had been expected in Icelandic handball circles.

Finally, as some of our (Pan)American readers are aware, there has been an ongoing debate about the legitimacy of an IHF decision to assign Greenland to the PanAmerican continent.   But I got a clue during my visit that, in fact, the IHF may have had more of a tangible, scientific basis for this decision than what may have been understood.  If anything, the question might arise whether one should really consider Iceland as a part of PanAmerica as well. 

The photo at the top provides the clarification.  Iceland sits atop the ‘Mid-Atlantic Ridge’, which separates the North American and Eurasian tectonic plates;  these are moving apart in a process known as the ‘continental drift’.  This drifting is related to earthquakes and tremors, and perhaps also to volcanic eruptions.  Nowhere is this division as visible as some distance east of Reykjavik, in the area of Thingvellir, where the Icelandic Parliament was established in the year of 930.  So perhaps we should take some credit and argue that most of the Icelandic handball players should in fact be considered ‘American’!?  At least perhaps, apropos John Ryan’s recent articles on the topic, they might qualify for dual citizenship!

 P.S.  If you wonder why there is not one word about women’s handball above, that is because I felt that the belated but remarkable progress on Icelandic women’s handball at the international level warrants a separate article that will come soon!

post

Bahrain and the situation of the athletes: do not think the problems are gone!

Partners in efforts to achieve change?

In recent weeks, much of the focus of the world has been on developments in Libya, Syria and Yemen.  By contrast, events in Bahrain have received comparatively much less attention.  One could easily be deceived to think that all the problems there are gone.  Then on June 1, the Bahraini government lifted its martial law decree, an action that was intended to signal an end to the violent crackdown against the Shiite opposition.  Conveniently, some people took this a sign that one could adopt a ‘business as usual’ attitude in the relations to Iran.

For instance, the Federation of Motorsports (FIA) quickly announced that the Formula 1 Grand Prix race that had been cancelled would now be reinstated in October, although there is some hope that the racing companies may not play along.  This may not be such a big issue for the racing world, but it certainly is a big deal for the Bahraini government.  This event is a matter of great pride for them, and very symbolic for their acceptance in the world of sports and business.  When I was visiting there, I was taken to the racing course, which for them is one of their most famous attractions. 

Both international observers and human rights activist within Bahrain have reacted with dismay.  Things are not suddenly back to normal, not even by Bahraini standards, just because of the June 1 decision.  Yes, a number of people have been let out of jail, many with physical and mental scars for life after brutal treatment.  A number of well-known athletes and sports journalists are among those who have been set free.  But many others remain in prison, like some national team players and top referees in handball and football, together with their counterparts in many other sports.

Of course, the Vice President of the Football Federation argued that those who remain in jail are not just protesters but criminals.  Accordingly, FIFA should have no business trying to inquire or get involved.  This football VP happens to be a prominent member of the ruling royal family, so he should know…  But my sources in Bahrain suggest that those who remain in jail are actually kept their almost as hostages or symbols, as a deterrent to the rest of the population.  Of course, as I have noted earlier, the regime has nothing to fear from entities such as IOC or FIFA.  Their habitual interference at the national level does not appear to extend to the countries or regions where the members of the ruling families are well entrenched in the IOC and international sports federations. 

On June 23, we are yet again supposed to have a global celebration of Olympic Day, a reminder to everyone around the world about the importance of the Olympic spirit.  This involves major sports and cultural events intended to ‘spread the Olympic ideals to every corner of the world’.  A map on the IOC web site shows that apparently no such events have been scheduled on the Arabian Peninsula.  Perhaps this is appropriate in the circumstances.  I have no disagreement with the notion of having an Olympic Day.  But perhaps it behooves the IOC also to set aside a special day in commemoration of those events and places where the Olympic spirit has been egregiously abused.

Clearly, just as I noted in my earlier article, athletes and sports officials are far from the only categories singled out for harsh treatment. What seems to me as especially outrageous is the persecution of medical doctors and nurses who lived up to their professional oath during the uprisings, treating people on both sides to the best of their ability, both in the streets and in the hospitals.  For their decisions to treat those who protested against the government, they are now imprisoned or mistreated in a highly targeted fashion.  Some of them are facing secret trials accused of treason.

So when President Obama met with the Crown Prince of Bahrain at the White House a couple of days ago, there were indeed serious matters to be discussed.  The U.S. government has been observed to tread very gingerly in the case of Bahrain.  And of course, it is ironic that the dialog was with the Crown Prince.  I am sure that he was delighted to back in Washington, despite the reasons and circumstances.  This is the place where he attended university and enjoyed the environment, as he enthusiastically told me some years ago.  And I am convinced of the veracity of everything that has been said about him as the member of the royal family who is a person of reason with a sense for democratic principles.  But he remains a ‘junior’ member of a family seemingly dominated by his retrograde uncle, the Prime Minister.  So it was appropriate, but nevertheless remarkable, that the Prime Minister’s attitude was openly subjected to criticism during the Crown Prince’s visit.

One can hope that both the open criticism and what is undoubtedly being conveyed behind the scenes will have some impact.  But it is naturally far too early to tell.  And in the meantime, representatives of the worlds of sports, business and politics would do well to refrain from prematurely resuming their affairs with the Bahraini regime.  On the contrary, it is necessary to keep up the pressure and show that their behavior is not tolerated.  At least there is a slight hope that this might have some positive effect for those still being persecuted!

post

Fatsis requests more Team Handball, ehfTV delivers!

Will German Coach Heiner Brand go out a winner?

There’s little doubt that NPR’s Stefan Fatsis, is America’s #1 mainstream media reporter Team Handball fan. Just this past Monday, Fatsis gave a shout out (starts at 58:15) to the USA Men’s National Team for their qualification for the PANAM Games and at the same time put out a plea for more Team Handball viewing opportunities. Well what Fatsis requests, the European Handball Federation (EHF) delivers. And in a big way starting on Wednesday with 2 critical European Championship Qualification matches webstreamed for free at ehfTV.com

European Qualification for Team Handball can often be a humdrum affair with top teams quickly distancing themselves from weaker teams in their group leading to inconsequential games in the final rounds. Not so in Group 5 this year as Austria, Germany and Iceland are locked in a 3 way battle for two spots. All three sides control their own destiny and the first pivotal match will be Austria hosting German Wednesday night.  Austria leads the group with 7 points and Germany is in 2nd place with 5 points. An Austria win would qualify Austria and put Germany in a dire straight as Iceland, currently in 3rd place with 4 points will likely knock off winless Latvia to move into in 2nd place with 6 points. Germany, in all likelihood will pick up 2 points from Latvia on Sunday as well, but then they will need an already qualified Austria to knock off Iceland in Iceland. So, translation: This is must not lose situation for Germany. (Also, based on goal differential for a three way tie, Germany would be in good shape with a draw)

But it’s also a key match for Austria, because they surely know that beating Germany in Innsbruck is going to be a whole lot easier then beating Iceland in Reykjavik. Should Austria lose to Germany the Iceland-Austria on Sunday will become a true elimination game with the winner punching a ticket to the EURO 2012 and the loser staying home.

The 3rd match has Lithuania hosting Spain. At first glance, this looks to be a showdown between two sides fighting for one remaining spot. And indeed both sides are level on 4 points. Only problem is that Spain is clearly a better side (they won the first head to head match in Spain 33-17) and Lithuania has to travel to Croatia on Sunday. So, even if Lithuania pulls off the upset, they’ll likely need Spain to lose again to Romania.

Handicap point spread in parenthesis

Wednesday, 8 June, 2011, 2015 CET (1415 US East Coast)
Germany (-1.5) at Austria
ehfTV On Demand: http://www.ehftv.com/ech/adults/men/2012/video/001751

AUDIO Commentary popup is below (Synch with the ehfTV video webstream)

Thursday, 9 June, 2011, 1845 CET (1245 US East Coast)
Spain (-6.5) at Lithuania
ehfTV Live Link: http://www.ehftv.com/ech/adults/men/2012/live/high/001750
ehfTV On Demand: http://www.ehftv.com/ech/adults/men/2012/video/001750

Sunday, 12 June, 2011, 1630 (Iceland Time) (1230 US East Coast)
Austria at Iceland
ehfTV Live Link: http://www.ehftv.com/ech/adults/men/2012/live/high/001752
ehfTV On Demand:http://www.ehftv.com/ech/adults/men/2012/video/001752

Subject to the on demand streams being posted in timely manner and the demands of the Ryan family household I will do an audio commentary of the Austria matches.

Stefan Fatsis article in NY Times (11 May 2009) Team Handball Has It All…: http://www.stefanfatsis.com/2009/05/11/team-handball-has-it-all/

 

post

Handball vs. football: part 2 – Champions League in Corruption: FIFA or IHF?

Mubarak and Blatter: unfortunate choices as role models for the IHF

My colleague John Ryan admits that he does not follow football very closely, so he may have missed much of the commotion leading up to the recent FIFA Election Congress, last year’s decision to award Russia and Qatar the rights to organize the 2018 and 2022 World Championships, and the last 30 years of constant accusations or rumors of rampant corruption.   So John is prepared to declare the IHF Champion of corruption and mismanagement.  I disagree:  FIFA is in a class by itself!  But our readers should feel free to weigh in with their opinions on this sordid comparison.

I have done my share of reporting about IHF power abuse and corruption, so I will only quickly remind about some of the stories here without repeating any details.  In 2008, the IHF President personally figured in a ‘less than flattering way’ in terms of personal involvement in the match fixing in the Asian qualifications for the Olympics.  Last year, media reported about a personal contract for the President to the tune of 600.000 Euro, in return for the awarding of the TV rights contract to Sportfive at the time.  Soon thereafter, persistent rumors were heard about illegitimate procedures regarding the awarding of the subsequent TV rights contract to UFA.  IOC President Rogge was reported to be less than pleased.

Then came the easy decision by the IHF Council to change the President’s status, from that of an elected official serving as a volunteer, to that of a full-time paid IHF employee at a salary in the order of US$ 500.000.  Neatly, this coincided with a proposal for the Council members to have their own remuneration quadrupled or more.  The two very competent office managers, the Head of Sports and the Head of Administration, were eased out and replaced by President himself and his long-time crony and compatriot as the persons running the IHF Office and supervising all activities.

First proposed for the postponed 2010 Congress and then again for the recent 2011 Congress, came a set of proposals for By-Law changes that would have legitimized a major power grab for the IHF and the President personally, at the expense of handball’s global stakeholders.  Fortunately, and almost surprisingly, there were enough alert Congress participants who saw through this attempt and managed to put a stop to it.  Virtually unchecked decision-making authority and control over the financial transactions would otherwise have been the result.  I understand John Ryan, if he feels that this list from just the last few years is ‘impressive’ enough to make the IHF a strong contender…

When looking at the record of FIFA one must backtrack a bit and provide some background.  Former President Havelange came into power in 1974, essentially through the ‘machinations’ of the then Adidas boss Horst Dassler, who was using his position in the world of sports business.  Dassler later also got his protégé Sepp Blatter into FIFA as the Secretary General.  Blatter soon began to cast his eyes on the presidency, and it became apparent that he had acquired the necessary ‘business acumen’ to achieve that promotion.  In the meantime, the sports marketing firm started by Dassler, ISL, had gained prominence, and it became a ‘helpful partner’ to FIFA, especially in the context of selling the TV rights for the World Cup.

Later on, in a major bankruptcy scandal and court case, it became clear that ISL, apart from getting commissions on contracts for TV and marketing rights, apparently had served as the middleman in the handling of bribes from deal makers around the world to senior FIFA officials to the tune of 140 million SwFrs.  While the IHF TV rights for a 4-year period of World Championships currently are in the order of US$ 80 million, the FIFA TV rights went from about US$1.2 billion in 2002 and 2006 to about 2.5 billion in 2010.  Other marketing rights were worth around US$ 1 billion.  So it is not surprising if the remunerations for a much larger group of FIFA executives dwarf those of the IHF Council members, and if the ‘expense accounts’ and outright bribes add up to rather astronomical amounts.  And of course, the President has an essentially unlimited account to spread around in continental and national federations for them to use for special projects…  But do not get the impression that the enormous revenue mainly goes to development in poor countries;  about half of the US$ 1.5 billion net profit from the 2010 World Cup was set aside for FIFA’s own administrative and operational expenses.  A nice state of affairs for an organization that Is legally recognized as a charity(!) and insists on total tax exemption wherever it organizes a World Cup.

Naturally, it is not surprising if virtually every member for a key position in FIFA is able to bring accusations against rivals and their supporters.  It is likely to be a hard job in FIFA circles to figure out who are the ones who do not have a skeleton in the closet.    And of course, the best chances of staying one step ahead in the FIFA power struggle is to make use of the various resources that come with the presidency and to hold on to that position. So the one person who seemed to be a plausible opponent in Blatter’s bid for re-election, Bin Hammam from Qatar, found himself being forced to withdraw and face a suspension at the last moment, following indications that money in support of his candidacy might been thrown around a bit too openly.  Remarkably, it also caused another notorious executive, Jack Warner from Concacaf to be caught up in the same affair, an amusing fate for someone always known as a Blatter crony.  There was then worldwide pressure for FIFA to postpone the election but, needless say, Blatter wanted none of that.  In a bizarre ‘press conference’ he dismissed any notion of a crisis.

In recent months, FIFA has also been plagued by suspicions and accusations that the Executive Committee’s voting last December regarding the hosting of the 2018 and 2022 World Cups may not have been above board.  Of course, some of the ‘dirt’ may have something to do with sore losers.  But the choice of Russia and Qatar as hosts will, almost by definition, bring up speculation that money or some other form of coercion may have played a role.  And several FIFA executives remain suspended after the discovery of clear evidence that bribes were solicited and/or received.  Some of those who lost out to Qatar in the bid for 2022 seem to feel some renewed hope, but it is difficult to prejudge if something as drastic as a new vote will be found to be justified.  At least it has caused a change for 2026 and onwards, in the sense that the entire FIFA congress will do the voting.

All in all, one could say that the amount of money involved in the legitimate and not so legitimate business transactions regarding FIFA are at a level almost beyond the imagination of the world of handball.  The complete cynicism surrounding the FIFA operations is also much more deep-rooted.  People shrug and talk about the ‘cost of doing business’.  Moreover, the big money, and the amount of PR and prestige involved in a football World Cup, inevitable bring in the really big names also in government circles.  Another major difference from the IHF situation, where the power abuse and soliciting of votes and favors is less overt and involves fewer people, is that in FIFA the corruption really seems to permeate the entire organization.  The IHF President does not conceal that the FIFA President is a close friend and role model, but I think he will have to admit to playing in a smaller league.

But the bottom line is that both organizations, each at their level, are affected by mismanagement and corruption to an extent that simply should not be tolerated.  So the question is what can be done.  FIFA’s Blatter perennially tries to convince the world, every time he has been re-elected, that FIFA will be able to get back on track on its own and through his leadership….  The latest gimmick for convincing people is to appoint a ‘solution committee’.  To lend credibility, Blatter seems to have in mind appointing Henry Kissinger, a known football fan, as the person in charge.  (After having once spent some time discussing handball rules with Kissinger at the Olympics, I know he also has a familiarity with handball, so perhaps he could do double duty…).

More seriously, I am more prepared to pick up on statement from IOC’s veteran and ‘truth sayer’ Richard Pound.  He commented in public last week that perhaps it would be time for the decent and dissatisfied football nations to withdraw from FIFA and establish an alternative.  As he noted, this has been done successfully before in other sports.  He really felt that the reputation of FIFA and of football as a sport was being damaged and that something needs to be done.  As is known, IOC does not interfere in such matters but expects the global family in each sport to clean up its own act.  And then it is up to IOC to recognize which is the entity that deserves to represent and manage the sport in an honest, democratic and effective manner.  Perhaps something to consider for those handball countries who really are the drivers, developers and revenue creators in our sport!

post

PATHF Second Chance Tourney: USA – Uruguay draw 23-23

23-23: A draw vs Uruguay means goal differential will be key for the U.S. tonight against Guatemala

Game 2 of the Pan American Team Handball Federation (PATHF) 2nd chance tournament ended in a dramatic 23-23 draw.  According to a recap provided by USA Team Leader, Jim Thome, the match was a see-saw affair throughout with the largest lead being a 3 goal lead for the U.S.  The match was a physical affair with 15 two minute penalties being assessed (8 for Uruguay and 7 for the U.S.)

A further account of the match including the last minute is at the USA Federation site:  http://usateamhandball.org/news/2011/06/04/usa-ties-uruguay-in-second-chance-tournament/42643

Qualification for the PANAM games will now come down to goal differential in the final match between USA and Guatemala later today.  On Friday, Uruguay beat Guatemala, 20-12, so a 9 goal or more USA victory would put the USA at the top of the table.  A 7 goal or fewer win would see Uruguay qualify.  An 8 goal victory would revert to the next tie breaker, total goals scored, so the U.S. will be looking to score 21 or more goals in the match.

Guatemala cannot win the title, but as host, can play the spoiler.  For a young team playing in front of a home crowd against the big country to the North this will surely be a challenge they will relish.

Note:  I now plan to interview Mark Ortega after Sunday’s match.  Throw off is at 6:00 PM local (8:00 PM East Coast Time).  I will try to post the interview by 11:00 PM East Coast time.

post

Handball vs. football: part 1 – which Barcelona was more exciting?

Double Champions

The coincidence last weekend of the Champions League final in football/soccer and the Final Four in handball offered the opportunity for some interesting comparisons.  So does the nasty action surrounding the FIFA Congress earlier this week, following soon after the IHF Congress which also had its controversies.  For me personally, it is natural to make these comparisons, because there is 25 years of football refereeing in my background, and I keep following at least a couple of games per week on TV during the European season.   I will start today with the more pleasant side, the games.

John Ryan and I commented a bit on the Final Four in a podcast some days ago.  The match-ups were intriguing, given the strong German-Spanish rivalry in recent years.   Both semi-finals were very tense and tough battles, and the rivalry is likely to have had something to do with that.  Even if both matches were more or less decided some time before the final whistle, they were really hard-fought.  But they also offered a lot of spectacular technical and tactical moves.   There were some great goals scored, but the performances of the goalkeepers were perhaps even more special. 

Then perhaps the fact that the final was played in Germany between two Spanish teams, who know each other so well and are the two totally outstanding teams in their league, made for an atmosphere that contained less drama.   But going back to the two semi-finals, what really stands out are the pace and the constant action.  There was really never a dull moment, and there were plenty of exciting one-on-one situations.   But the nature of handball also contributes:  fast and furious attacking on one side and then, without time to catch one’s breathe, something equally dramatic on the other side.  Handball really is, literally speaking, goal-oriented.

Clearly there were also many reasons to admire the skills displayed, especially by the Barcelona team, in the football final.  Media headlines spoke of ‘the best final ever’ or ‘the best team ever’ and the losing coach stated that his team had never before been so outclassed.  But then it should be emphasized that the style that made Barcelona so dominant was one of ball control.  When the score was 0-0 and 1-1 early in the game, it was noted that Barcelona had had the ball more than 70% of the time and that they had delivered more than twice as many successful passes as the opponents.  Impressive, yes, but exciting or dramatic, no!  What made the game exciting were instead some of the goals scored, as they showed touches of absolute brilliance.   But those are still brief moments in a 90-minute game.

Of course I will now be accused of speaking too much like an American, who supposedly cannot see anything exciting in aspects other than the goals scored (although I would argue that there exists a slow and boring super-American game that is popular despite its infrequent scoring;  no, I will not mention its name…).  And yes, someone has labeled football ‘the chess of the green field’, which suggests that there are a lot of moves that deserve to be watched and admired without having anything to do with goal-scoring.  Nevertheless, not even a Barcelona team can keep your attention as constantly and intensively in football, as they or one of their rivals can easily do in handball.

So what is then the point I am trying to make?  Well, I know that I can never expect to convert a true football fan into thinking that handball is more exciting, just as the opposite also holds true.  But from an American standpoint, where I am pleasantly surprised to see how huge football is at the youth level and how nicely the Major League Soccer is thriving, it should really carry a message.  If Americans can become so interested in football, how is it then that a sport that seems so much more suited for American tastes and preferences is finding it so difficult to penetrate and become established?  And what can we do to make sure that handball, with its intensity, constant action and goal-scoring, becomes the real ‘eye-opener’ that it deserves to be??

post

EHF Final Four (Best Weekend of the Year for Handball Webstreaming Fans)

Four teams will battle for the Champions League Trophy this weekend and you can see it all at ehfTV.com

No complaints from this Handball fan in regards to this weekend’s matchups.  The semifinals on Saturday should be interesting to say the least with the Liga Asobal and the Handball Bundesliga going head to head in both matches.  Rhein-Neckar is a 2.5 goal underdog to Spanish champions Barcelona.  Rhein-Neckar will have the home country court advantage while Barcelona will be going for a rare 2 sport “double” with their sister team going for the Champions League soccer title later in the evening.  The second match pits German champion Hamburg vs. Spanish runner up Ciudad Real.  The oddsmakers couldn’t pick a favorite between these two titan, so don’t be surprised if it goes down to the end.

On Sunday, there will be two more matches with the semifinal losers squaring off for 3rd place, before the final match.  ehfTV will be broadcasting all four matches live and will have English commentary with Tom O’Brannagain on hand for pre and post game commentary as well.

Match Schedule (Handicap point spread in parentheses)

Saturday, 28 May

Rhein-Neckar vs. Barcelona (-2.5) (ehfTV: 3:15 PM CET, 09:15AM (U.S. East Coast)
On Demand Broadcast: http://www.ehftv.com/final4/ec/cl/men/2010-11/video/001671

Ciudad Real vs. Hamburg (Pick em) (ehfTV:  6:00 PM CET, 12:00 PM (U.S. East Coast)
On Demand Broadcast link:  http://www.ehftv.com/final4/ec/cl/men/2010-11/video/001672

Sunday, 29 May

3rd Place Game: 3:15 PM CET, 09:15AM (U.S. East Coast)

On Demand broadcast at ehfTV: http://www.ehftv.com/final4/ec/cl/men/2010-11/video/001711

 

Final: 6:00 PM CET, 12:00 PM (U.S. East Coast)

On Demand broadcast at ehfTV:  http://www.ehftv.com/final4/ec/cl/men/2010-11/video/001712

U.S. TV Broadcast

There is also a televised tape delayed broadcast of the Final on the MHz Network in the U.S. at 4:00 PM (U.S. East Coast) on Sunday, 29 May. For information on how you can watch MHZ see this link: http://www.mhznetworks.org/mhzworldview/carriage/

Side note:  For those of you who can’t watch the matches live, be advised that you may want to strategically use a sheet of paper to avoid seeing the still photos used for the on demand video link.  I’ve pleaded with the EHF to not use a trophy hoisting celebration photo (for those who don’t want to know the outcome), but I haven’t got any response as to whether they will meet this reasonable demand.  UPDATE:  If you use the links above you can watch the games without knowing the outcome.  However, if you go to ehfTV.com directly be advised- you’ll immediately know the outcome.

ehfTV Preview of Final Four: http://www.ehftv.com/ehfCL-show

post

Is ’50-50′ refereeing not what we want??

I have touched on this topic in some other context in the past, but the Gislason embarrassment (which I wrote about last week) causes me to bring it up again.  After a game where Kiel played unbelievably poorly and also were let down by their normally great goalkeeper Omeyer, coach Gislason had the nerve to wonder in public if the EHF had ordered the referees to keep Kiel out of the Final Four.  Amazingly, three weeks later there has been no EHF announcement of action taken in response to Gislason’s accusation of fraudulent behavior on the part of the EHF, with the complicity of the referees.

But it appears that a major cause for the anger was that the referees had the audacity to be neutral!  They did not follow the example of most referees in ‘home and away’ competition under the jurisdiction of the EHF, i.e., favoring the home team in a ’60-40′ fashion or something in that direction.  This past season I have watched around 75 games in the Champions League or in the other EHF Club competitions, live or on a delay basis, using the EHF-TV web casts.  So when I say that 60-40 is common and that the home team can count on at least 55-45, then I do have a basis for this statement. 

Having spent a long career in the IHF, where most events take place in one country and are decided through individual matches, I have always pondered the contrast with the many EHF events that are based on the ‘home and away’ system.   Most of the top EHF games are handled by referees who are also used in IHF events.  Yet, there is this blatant difference between refereeing that is reasonably close to 50-50 in neutral locations and refereeing that consistently tends to be 55-45 or 60-40 in favor of the home team in ‘home and away’ games.  This difference was clear when I attended the Men’s World Championship in Sweden and also saw many games from the Women’s European Championship on the internet. 

Over the years I have had many opportunities to discuss this issue with experts, including coaches, former top referees and psychologists.  We know that there are other advantages that come from being a home team:  no need for tiring travel, playing in a familiar and comfortable setting, and having the support of a sometimes fanatic home crowd.  But is it really unavoidable that a ‘refereeing bonus’ should come on top of these other, legitimate advantages?

Is the pressure so enormous in these games?  Are the referees genuinely striving very hard to offer 50-50 but fall victims to a subconscious, unintended bias that comes from the crowd pressure etc?   Is it related to the fact that the group of EHF referees that has the experience, competence and confidence to resist pressures and handle very difficult assignments is in fact quite small, smaller than what the EHF really would need for its vast competition activities?  Partly this may help explain the problem, but also the recognized top referees have problems of this kind.

Recently I wrote about the suspicion that referees knowingly try to ‘take the easy way out‘ in some game situations where they feel they can get away with this approach because chances are slim that they will be caught.  This concerned giving incorrect 7-meters when a defender is in fact standing outside the 6-meter line, not inside, when being run into by an attacker.  It also involved the temptation of allowing a goal scored after a foul that caused a player to touch the floor in the goal area before releasing the ball.  Here the correct solution would be a 7-meter, but too often a goal is given. 

Could it be that the same tendency, in a broader sense, exists in the handling of home/away games??  Is there a view that 55-45 or 60-40 is not just good ‘self-protection’ but also fully acceptable, because in the two games it comes out even?  I hope I am wrong in implying that referees may be so calculating, but I am beginning to fear that I am far too often justified in this belief.

The problem becomes acute when there are referees who are determined and able to stick to 50-50 also in ‘home and away’ games.  I know that clubs and national teams in Europe know exactly which referees they love to have when they play a difficult away game.  And by the same token, these are the referees whom they might prefer not to have at home.  My understanding is that the EHF, to some extent, try to assign referees in such a way that, for a given match-up, both matches are handled by ’50-50 couples’ or both matches are handled by referees who might be technically competent but are known to have a 55-45 or 60-40 tendency. 

Unfortunately, if the reader innocently wonders why we do not then insist that all referees stick to 50-50 so that we get consistency, I fear the answer is that this would not be realistic.  As I noted above, the number of EHF games is so huge and requires so many referees that there is little hope to get to a situation where one could rely exclusively on referees who are strong enough to live up to such an expectation.   But at least it might be a step in the right direction if the demands on the referees and, perhaps above all, the evaluation and follow-up of the referees were to be strengthened in this respect.

In the meantime, while the upcoming ‘Final Four’ may not offer an entirely neutral setting for German-Spanish match-ups, it is at least not a ‘home-away’ format.  So let us hope that the referees come with a determination to keep all the games under control and with a ’50-50′ objective.  In this regard, I am really pleased to see that Gjeding/Hansen, the solid Danish referees who were affected by the Gislason outrage, were promptly given a nomination for a game in the Final Four.   Good luck to all the couples!

post

Time for a True European Super League (Part 3): Why playoffs are overwhelming superior to season long championship

For the past few weeks, America's #1 Handball fan has been watching this German athlete more than the German Bundesliga. Why?

 

In Part 1, I highlighted how Europeans might want to consider making their sports leagues more like their Governments.  In Part 2, I provided an overall framework for a European Super League  In Part 3 of this series I take on the totally absurd notion that NBA/NHL style playoffs won’t work for European Professional Handball.

First, let’s establish that I’m a big fan of the sport of Handball.  Heck, I’ll go out on a limb and state that I am the #1 fan of the sport in the U.S.  Certainly, I doubt that any of my 308,000,000 compatriots watch more Handball on TV or the internet on a yearly basis.  (If you think you’re a bigger fan, please drop me a line at john.ryan@teamhandballnews.com and will compare notes.) So, it should be clear, I’m not here to bash the sport.  In fact, you’ll be hard pressed to find a bigger promoter of it.

Secondly, I’m not some clueless American who doesn’t understand European sports traditions.  On the contrary, I lived five years in France and became totally immersed in the club sport culture.  I played one season of lower division Handball and four years of over age 35 basketball in Levallois, a suburb of Paris.  Ask me what I enjoyed the most about living in France and I will say without hesitation it was playing club sports.  Oh, how I wish the U.S. had clubs where individuals of every level can play from the age of 5 years to 70.  (Yes, incredibly there was a 70 year old player on our basketball team.  I’ll never forget figuring out just how old he was after he told me about the Americans throwing him candy from the tanks back in 1945.)

Third, I think I’ve got a pretty good understanding of European professional club handball.  Living in France, I became a pretty big of the French League and this year, I’ve enjoyed watching around 70 German Bundesliga matches.  It’s truly been great to immerse myself in what is clearly the top professional Handball league in the world.

So, sorry for the diatribe, but I think I’ve got some pretty strong credentials to take on this topic.  And while there are many aspects of the American sports model, I’d like to see Europeans adopt, the most needed reform is clearly the addition of playoffs.   I’ve always thought this, but the TV viewing choices I have made the last few weeks have brought even greater clarity to the validity of this position.  To further explain, let’s just say that there are only so many hours in a day available to watch sports.  And earlier this year, for the first time in my life, I could choose to watch traditional American sports or Handball.  And while I didn’t go cold turkey on the sports I grew up with, Handball took priority.  Even more remarkably, basketball, my first sport passsion, became an afterthought.

But as Hamburg’s run to an HBL title became all but apparent my interest started to wane and since the NBA playoffs started in mid April my DVR queue has started to pile up with HBL matches.  Why would
America’s self-proclaimed #1 Handball fan suddenly prefer to watch basketball over handball?  Do I really have to explain this? OK, the answer is:

In terms of entertainment value, meaningless games with no bearing whatsoever on a championship cannot even begin to compete with the compelling “do or die” nature of a playoff format.

I’d like to maintain that even defenders of the championship format won’t argue this point.  They might argue about the logistics and the fairness of playoffs, but nobody in their right mind should argue about the entertainment value.   Seriously, do you want to watch Balingen-Kiel with nothing on the line or game 5 of Kiel vs. Hamburg for the title?

However, entertainment value is not everything.  Although, arguably for a professional sports league it should be the most important thing.  But, since this is Europe there are other reasons to defend the Championship model.  Herewith are some of those reasons and a rebuttal as to why they aren’t valid.

1) It’s not the fairest way to determine a champion. Players could be injured at the end of the season and a team that was playing poorly earlier in the year could get “hot” and win the title.  Only a championship format will fairly reward a team for consistent performance.
Rebuttal: If every club knows the rules for determining the league winner before the season starts, then whatever method is used can be considered fair.  Furthermore, what can be fairer than to have two teams play each other in a best of 5 or best of 7?  Seriously, the likelihood that an inferior team is going to put together 4 upsets is pretty unlikely.  No, if you can beat the other team 4 times, then clearly you are the better team.

2) Europeans only care about their local teams and are not interested in watching other teams play.
Rebuttal: If you have two high quality teams going head to head in a playoff series people will watch and when they watch, if they have a pulse, they can’t help but get drawn in.  In the recent NBA playoffs, I found myself becoming a fan of the Memphis Grizzlies, an 8 seed that knocked off the 1 seed, San Antonio and then battled Oklahoma City to a game 7 final in the next round.  I knew absolutely nothing about that team prior to the playoffs, yet ended up making sure I saw everyone of their games.  Could the same thing happen in Handball?  You bet and I would probably put middle of the road HBL side like Grosswalstadt in that category.  Sure, their victory over Kiel in Kiel was interesting, but other than dropping Kiel down a notch what did it mean?  Now, imagine Grosswalstadt as an 8 seed that #1 seed Hamburg has to be wary of in a 5 or 7 game series.  Hey, that sounds interesting.  I’m going make sure I see that.

3) It’s too many games. The season is long as it is.  Adding playoff games will make it even longer.
Rebuttal: If you structure the league properly it won’t be too many games.  In particular, in order to properly stage playoffs, it will be necessary to shorten the regular season a couple of months.

4) Clubs that don’t make the playoffs will have fewer games and will lose revenue. With a shortened regular season clubs that don’t make the playoffs will have nothing going on for the last couple of months.  What will the players do and won’t that be devastating financially to those clubs?
Rebuttal: Well, I can’t argue about the fewer games.  That’s life in the big city.  The financial loss will not be devastating, however, if the league has revenue sharing for their TV contract.  Not all of the revenue would be shared 100% equally, so clubs and players would still have lots of incentives for winning and advancing in the playoffs.  As an aside, you might find it interesting to note that NBA players (especially those with high salaries) are ridiculously underpaid during the playoffs, making only a fraction more than their base salaries.  In theory, if money was their only object, many of them would be better off losing and relaxing on the
beach.

5) These playoffs would interfere with Champions League. If two clubs were going head to head and one of them was still in the Champions League it would give an unfair advantage to the team that wasn’t.
Rebuttal: No argument from me on this one.  This is why, if you re-read part 2, you’ll see where I highlight that Super League teams would not participate in the Champions League or National Cups.  You can’t do both and as I explained if there was a true Super League, you wouldn’t want to.  Don’t get me wrong as things are currently structured the Champions League is the best thing going.  Next weekend, I’m really looking forward to the semifinals and final.    Those games mean something as they are “do or die” and a championship is on the line.  Still, if I had my druthers, those 4 sides wouldn’t be playing 2 knockout games.  No, they’d be playing two best of 5 semifinal series.  And instead of watching the Bulls vs. the Heat or the Mavericks vs. the Thunder on TV every other night I’d be taking turns watching R-N L vs. Barca and Hamburg vs. Ciudad Real.  I can dream, can’t I?

post

Contrasting approaches

By coincidence, rather different ways of viewing similar problems have come up in the last couple of days.  One of the issues involved is the dilemma of ‘focus on national teams vs. supremacy of the club handball’.

This was highlighted when Heiner Brand gave a press conference in Germany apropos his switch from many years as the coach of the men’s national team to a multi-faceted position in the German Federation.  Here he will focus on the education of younger talents, coordination with regional federations, education for coaches, and coordination with research institutions among other things.  But in his statement, a noticeably frustrated Brand could not refrain from lashing out against many of the stakeholders in German handball, especially on the club side.

Brand described top clubs as business entities located in Germany but with little interest in the development of German handball (players).  He talked about Bundesliga representatives as naïve or ignorant, and he characterized the association of top European clubs as dangerous.  He repeated his insistence on a quota approach, i.e., a requirement for a certain number of German players on each Bundesliga club.  While he will need to bring people together and try to pull in the same direction when in his new job, his statements clearly seemed more polarizing than aimed at reconciling views.

On the same day in Sweden, the federation president, Hans Vestberg (known also as the top man at global giant Ericsson), proudly introduced a new approach with a very different mindset.  The Swedish Federation talked about making the men’s and women’s handball teams the most popular national teams in Sweden.  To that end, they have set up a new structure, with a business company, parallel to (but coordinated with) the Federation structure, which will coordinate the team development but also focus very strongly on the business, PR and marketing aspects. 

Not just have the 2+2 coaches of the national teams been made full-time employees, freed up from club duties, but a ‘managing director’ has been hired to oversee both the sports and the business side.  He is none other than Stefan Lovgren, one of the globally best known and respected ex-players of recent decades.  And there is most definitely no tension between the national team focus and the interest of the top clubs in the Swedish league.  If anything, the top clubs expect to benefit greatly from this strengthened focus on the national teams.

As I wrote in a recent article, the top clubs hope to become more competitive at the European level, both as a league and in terms of success for the individual clubs.  They hope to be stronger in their aspirations by following the same business-oriented approach now introduced in the spirit of Hans Vestberg and Stefan Lovgren.  And the team coaches, Ola Lindgren and Staffan Olsson, do not find reason to complain that the Swedish League, with a standard currently far from comparable to Bundesliga, is constituting an inadequate development basis for the new generation of young Swedish talents.

Finally, apropos contrasting approaches, I want to congratulate Zamalek (Egypt), Pinheiros (Brazil) and Southern Stars (Australia) for representing their countries and continents so honorably in the IHF Super Globe event that just finished.  They were third, fourth and fifth behind Kiel and Ciudad Real in the fair and serious part of the competition.  If this does not match the ranking that you have seen, this is because I count Valladolid, Veszprem and Yugoslavia All Stars separately, in their thinly disguised attempt to masquerade as representatives of Asian clubs.

post

Did the EHF order the referees to keep Kiel out of the Final Four??

Natural to react during the game, but not to bring accusations afterwards

Well, of course not!  In a certain other continent, this would not have been so surprising, if one thinks back to the scandal involving the qualifications for the 2008 Olympics, but surely not in Europe.   So when Kiel’s coach Alfred Gislason openly expressed this accusation to the media following the Kiel-Barcelona quarterfinal on May 1, the issue is not really whether his accusation had merit but why on earth is the EHF dealing with it in such a slow and bureaucratic manner!?

I know from experience that international and continental sports federations tend to be very formal and meticulous in dealing with disciplinary matters, and their regulations and procedures are often not set up to deal with urgent matters very swiftly.  And generally speaking, I have full respect for the concept of ‘due process’.  But here we are dealing with a matter that is both absolutely clear-cut and extremely serious.  There can be no doubt or dispute about what Gislason said.  And there can be no disagreement about how potentially damaging and completely unacceptable his action was.

Coaches are entitled to be frustrated after a key defeat and to have whatever opinions they want.  Up to a point, one can even tolerate some criticism of referees in public.  But there must be no tolerance for public statements that amount to asserting a complete lack of integrity on the part of the EHF, a pair of referees who deservedly enjoy a high reputation, and our sport as a whole!  For such extreme cases, special procedures must exist under which swift and serious punishment can be meted out.  Such a case just cannot be allowed to drag on!  

It is simply not good enough that the EHF after about ten days announced that “it has filed a claim with its Arbitration Tribunal”, and that after one more week there is no result and punishment.  In the meantime, Gislason is coaching Kiel in an IHF event, where he and his team are official representatives of Europe and the EHF!!  By comparison, in the context of NBA, NHL or the NFL, a decision and a suspension with immediate effect would have been in place within 24 hours.  The EHF, with its extensive competition activities and frequent matches, must ensure that an ’emergency procedure’ exists.  (And by the way, this kind of case illustrates why it is a bit awkward that the lowest level disciplinary body is labeled ‘Arbitration Tribunal’…).

I could stop there, because this is really the essence of the matter.  But it does cause me to comment on a couple of other aspects.

First, it has been rather interesting to read some of the comments in the German media.  Here one can find unbiased reports which recognize that Kiel played an unusually weak game against Barcelona, also when taking into account injury issues and other shortcomings of the line-up.  And it was also very clear that Omeyer had an extremely poor game, not just by his high standards but by any comparison.  Writers commented that Gislason, apparently like on several other occasions, had shown too much deference to his star goalie, not having the courage to take him out much earlier.  So it seems that it requires much less courage to blame it all on the referees and the EHF…

Second, there is one aspect of Gislason’s statement that may not have been given enough attention in media.  It may have its specific advantages to have a German-Spanish rivalry in the EHF club events, but it is rather doubtful that this is healthy and stimulating for the longer-term development.  Surely, the currently utopian idea of having eight countries from different parts of Europe represented in the quarter-finals would create even more widespread enthusiasm.  Football has a bit of an advantage in this respect, although admittedly precisely this year’s Europa League final causes similar grumbling.  Of course, the existing situation reflects a reality that nobody could quickly or easily change.  So one can only hope that economic circumstances will permit other leagues, or at least individual clubs, to increase their efforts to become more fully competitive.

post

After the IHF Congress: time to plan ahead, not to celebrate

Is IHF President Moustafa really polishing diamonds?

It might feel like the moment to celebrate, when the IHF President failed to gain approval for his attempt to legalize the autocracy he is so desperately seeking.  But I hope there will be reason to celebrate after the election Congress in 2013.  In the meantime, I simply want to thank those Congress delegates who realized how dangerous and inappropriate most of the By Law proposals were, and then had the good judgment and courage to vote against them.

The President, who undoubtedly had expected to be able to celebrate at this point, instead mumbled about “IHF still being in the middle of the road and having a long way to go”, a rather amazing statement from someone so supremely confident in his own views and methods”.  The IHF web site had previously reported his comments at the opening of the Congress: “handball is like a diamond, we only need to polish it to turn it into a brilliant”.  Well, he is in fact right in comparing our sport with a diamond, but regrettably he understands as little about doing the right things with handball as he appears to know about diamonds!

Turning a diamond into a brilliant is a long and difficult process that requires a true expert.  The process of blocking and faceting the stone can be compared with the need for setting goals and strategies for developing and managing world handball, something that the President has sadly failed to understand.  Instead we are running the risk that with his lack of skills he will be chopping the diamond into small pieces while taking his own cut.  And the marketing and selling of the jewel is also something best left for a real and honest expert.  After all, we are not dealing with cheap jewelry in a bazaar.

I have talked with several people who attended the Congress, and the chaos they describe actually makes it sound more like a bazaar.  The President, in his efforts to prioritize personal loyalty, is no longer surrounded by senior IHF employees and other persons who have the competence to manage a Congress, to run a Federation and, for example, to handle a complex document such as the By-Laws.  So the question is how long this state of affairs will be allowed to continue.  For how long will a well-paid and scared group of loyalists be able to resist the pressures of the decent and serious members of the handball family who are beginning to realize that it has gone too far, down the wrong road!?

It is not enough to protest and resist.  As has been seen on the political scene in a number of countries in recent months, it is important that better suited leaders are prepared to step forward, ready to take on important responsibilities and able to lead strongly in a better direction.  Two years, until the next election Congress, may seem like a long time.  But the moment to begin the planning and collaborating is now!

And it is equally important to ensure that the ways of the President are carefully scrutinized in the meantime.  The tendency to act as if the inappropriate By-Laws were already in place had clearly been noticed.  And it is difficult to believe that these tendencies will disappear unless they are checked and stopped.  But by whom!?  Well, most of the income of the IHF is generated, directly or indirectly, by a relatively limited number of countries, federations, leagues, clubs and players, who surely do not want the results of their efforts and talents squandered, instead of being put to use for global handball development in a systematic, efficient and fair manner.

P.S.  If you wonder about the choice of image above this article:  well, apart from the link to diamonds, it is all a question of percentages.   Like getting a sufficient share of the votes to defeat By-Law proposals and getting enough to win an election; but it is also a question of where does the revenue go:  to genuine development efforts, to effective promotion of handball, or into compensation for a select group of officials!?