Greenland Saga Continues

[html] In November of 2006 the Pan American Team Handball Federation (PATHF) downgraded Greenland’s full membership to an associated membership. This change in membership status meant that Greenland could no longer participate in qualification events for any Handball World Championships (youth, junior or senior). Greenland appealed this decision to the IHF Arbitration Commission and in November of 2007 the Commission ruled that Greenland should be reinstated as a full member of the Pan American Team Handball Federation (PATHF).

Team Handball News has now learned, however, that the PATHF has not accepted this decision and has requested that the IHF “set aside the decision of the arbitration Commission and to allow PATHF to explain in writing its arguments in support of the decision taken by its Continental Congress.” In a letter to the IHF dated, December 12, 2007, the PATHF claims that the IHF did not follow due process and failed to either hold oral hearings or request that the PATHF submit written arguments in support of their case. It should be noted, however, that this PATHF claim appears to be in direct contradiction to the Appeal finding which noted the following, “This Commission regrets to note that the Pan America Federation offered no response to this appeal nor did it offer a defence to the claims, making the work of the Commission much harder.”
The IHF Office has forwarded the PATHF letter to the Arbitration Commission on 18 December, but as of this date there has been no further action taken by the IHF. In the meantime, the first PATHF qualification tournament since Greenland’s reinstatement, the PATHF Women’s Under 20 Championship, is rapidly approaching. Scheduled for February in Argentina, Greenland has contacted the PATHF and Argentinia Federation for information, but there requests have gone unanswered. Frustrated with these apparent delaying tactics the Greenland Handball Federation (GHF formally requested on January 18, 2008 that the IHF step in and take action to ensure that Greenland can participate in this tournament. As of this date, Greenland has not received a response back from the IHF concerning this request. [/html]

European Championships (The Olympic Ramifications: Part 2)

[html] With the Semifinals pairs( France vs. Croatia and Germany vs. Denmark) known there’s a little bit more certainty as to how the upcoming Olympic Qualification Tournaments shape up. Here’s an update:
Automatic Bid: France, Croatia or Denmark will get the automatic ticket to Beijing. As Germany has already qualified for the World Championships, should they win, the runner up will get the automatic European ticket.

European 2nd and 3rd place spots: Norway and Sweden have secured these two spots. The winner of the 5th place game between these two teams will take 2nd and the loser will take the 3rd place spot.

The Olympic Qualification tournaments will shuffle based on who wins the European championships. Below are the scenarios:

If Denmark wins the European Championships
Tourney 1: Poland, Iceland, Europe 2nd (Norway or Sweden), Argentina
Tourney 2: France, Spain, Tunisia, Europe 3rd (Norway or Sweden)
Tourney 3: Croatia, Russia, Asia 2nd (Japan or South Korea), Algeria

If France wins the European Championships
Tourney 1: Poland, Iceland, Europe 2nd (Norway or Sweden), Argentina
Tourney 2: Denmark, Spain, Tunisia, Europe 3rd (Norway or Sweden)
Tourney 3: Croatia, Russia, Asia 2nd (Japan or South Korea), Algeria

If Croatia wins the European Championships
Tourney 1: Poland, Iceland, Europe 2nd (Norway or Sweden), Argentina
Tourney 2: Denmark, Spain, Tunisia, Europe 3rd (Norway or Sweden)
Tourney 3: France, Russia, Asia 2nd (Japan or South Korea), Algeria

2009 World Championships

Europe will be awarding 3 direct tickets for the 2009 World Championsips.  Germany (Defending Champion) and Croatia (host) have already qualified.  France and Denmark therefore have qualified and the winner of the Norway-Sweden 5th place match will secure the 3rd ticket.  The 11 teams that didn't secure a direct ticket will join the 7 pool winners from the European World Championship Qualification pools that just recently finished.  Those 18 teams will be paired for 9 home and away winner take all playoffs.  As you never know who you could get paired up, Norway and Sweden have a lot to play for in their 5th place game. [/html]

Times of London Handball Article Misses the Goal

Matt Dickinson of The Times of London has written a highly critical piece questioning public funding in support of the British Handball Program. The basic premise of the article is that the 3 million British Pounds ($5.9M) through 2009 that has been earmarked to develop competitive handball teams for the 2012 Olympics is a waste of funding that could be better spent on sports where British athletes have a feasible chance of medaling.

While I agree that the chances of the Brits medaling are nearly zero this is not the primary goal of the program. The primary goal in simple terms is to field teams that are competitive and can give a credible accounting of themselves on the court. Of course, it can be argued as to whether even this is a worthwhile goal. It all depends on your perspective.

The article points out how much is now being spent on British Handball, but it fails to point out how practically no funding was provided prior to the recent influx. Still despite this lack of support there is an established club system in Britain which is more organized than other countries (ex. USA) which have participated in the Olympics previously. Additionally, the funding Handball now receives is still significantly smaller than the funding that many other sports in Great Britain receive. Medaling in some of these other sports is also an unlikely prospect and yet they did not receive the “Handball” treatment from the Times. Even more extreme, is the largesse provided to soccer. With arguably the richest professional soccer league in the world, soccer development does not need that kind of Government support. If every penny of that money went away there would still be thousands of youth teams and millions of Pounds being spent to develop young soccer talent. So if your perspective is relative to the funding other sports receive, I think it’s accurate to say that Handball is now finally getting it’s fair share.

In the larger scheme of things, however, one can always make a case against any Government funding for sport. There are surely run down sections of London or Manchester that could use a million pounds for community development. In some parts of the world there are people getting by on a dollar a day. Where do you draw the line? Some would argue that no money should be spent on games when there are so many problems that need solving. Just think of how much could be accomplished if every pound being spent on a two week London party was redirected elsewhere Others would argue that an appropriate balance is needed. I fall in that camp as do many others in the World. One only has to look at the kids playing soccer on dusty streets around the world to know that even the poorest people find discretionary funds to purchase soccer balls.

Oh, and one more thing: How can anyone claim that Great Britain is a “country remarkable for its sporting diversity?” Give me a break! As far as sports goes in Britain there is soccer and everything else. And that everything else is pretty much limited to rugby and cricket. My goodness, the most popular indoor sport is darts; which believe it or not is televised regularly. In terms of all team indoor sports Britain is woefully undeveloped when compared to any other European country. Britain sorely needs a National Indoor Team Sport- Why not Handball?

Times of London (22 Jan 2008:  The lost cause sticking its hand out for 3M pounds of Olympic Riches: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/columnists/matt_dickinson/article3228314.ece

Asian Olympic Qualification Replay (Japan vs. South Korea)

[html] The IHF has officially announced that the Asian Olympic Qualification Replay will be only a two nation event between Japan and South Korea. Japan will host the winner take all matches at Yoyogi National Stadium in Tokyo. The women will play on Tuesday, 29 January and the men will play the next day. The other nations that participated in the original tournament have indicated that they will not participate.
Meanwhile, the Japan Times reports, that the Asian Handball Federation (AHF) has notified the IHF that they may decide to appeal the IHF’s decision to hold the two team replay to the International Sports Arbitration Council. Additionally, unverified news group postings have indicated that the AHF Executive Council will be meeting on 27 January and may even decide to remove Japan and South Korea from the AHF.

IHF Notice: http://www.ihf.info/front_content.php?idcat=57&idart=1009Japan Times Article:http://search.japantimes.co.jp/rss/sp20080120a4.html

Commentary: Note to AHF: Be very careful what you wish for. Loudly complaining in the halls of your respective nations is one thing, but appealing to the neutral International Sports Arbitration Council is another thing entirely. Perhaps the AHF will ask for the Arbitration Council to only narrowly address the IHF”s right to interfere with AHF matters. But, if the Arbitration Council investigates the tournaments fully they could very well come to the same conclusions that the IHF did. This would simply publicize the controversy even more and who knows, maybe the IOC will decide to take some action. [/html]

African Nations Cup Results

[html] Africa’s premiere tournament was recently held in Angola. Conducted every two years this tournament serves as the qualification both for the Olympics and the upcoming World Championships for both the Men and Women.
Women’s Results
As expected, Angola dominated the tournament winning every match by double digits except a pool play match against Congo 35-30. Cote d’Ivoire was the surprise team of the tournament as they upset Congo in the semifinals 29-28 to take 2nd place in the tournament. Congo defeated Tunisia to secure 3rd place.

Angola secures the automatic qualification to Beijing and Cote d’Ivoire will have the opportunity to qualify in a to be determined Olympic Qualification Tournament. Assumin the IHF follows previous World Championship qualification rules the top 4 teams (Angola, Cote d’Ivoire, Congo and Tunisia) have qualified for the 2009 Women’s World Championships in China.

Final Standings
1) Angola
2) Cote d’Ivoire
3) Congo
4) Tunisia
5) Democratic Republic of Congo
6) Algeria
7) Cameroon
8 ) Gabon

Men’s Results
As expected, Olympic qualification came down to a gold medal game between Tunisia and Egypt, with the Pharoahs coming out on top 27-25. The Angolan men had a disappointing tournament. Despite, playing at home they barely advanced out of pool play and lost the 3rd place match against Algeria.

Egypt has booked a ticket for Beijing while both Tunisia and Algeria will have another opportunity at an Olympic Qualification Tournament later this year. Algeria will be a long shot, but Tunisia should have a chance. Egypt, Tunisia and Algeria have also qualified for the 2009 World Championships in Croatia.

Final Standings
1) Egypt
2) Tunisia
3) Algeria
4) Angola
5) Democratic Republic of the Congo
6) Nigeria
7) Cameroon
8 ) Morocco

For more information on the tournament check out the official webpagehttp://www.can08-handball.ao/ And as a side note, it’s a pretty impressive webpage. Only the European and World Championship pages that have been done better. [/html]

Who is Erik Eggers?

[html] If you read this cryptic notice http://www.ihf.info/front_content.php?idcat=57&idart=1006 on the IHF Website you may have been asking this question.
“IHF obtains interim injunction against misleading media coverage

The district court of the city of Hamburg approved the IHF's appeal for an interim injunction against the journalist Erik Eggers (Landgericht Hamburg, 4.1.2008, Az: 324 O 1127/07). Eggers had published false allegations concerning IHF President Dr Hassan Moustafa in various well known Swiss and German publications.

Should Eggers continue his misleading reporting, he faces a fine of up to 250.000 Euro or detention.”

The short answer: Erik Eggers is a German journalist who has been in the forefront in regards to media coverage on the controversy surrounding the Asian Olympic Qualification. At the IHF press conference held at the end of the Women’s World Championships in France he confronted IHF President Dr Hassan Moustafa as to why the IHF had not intervened in the Asian continental qualification outcome. Additionally, he has appeared on Germany Television to discuss the issue.
He is, however, not the only reporter to address this controversy and it is not clear why he alone is being singled out and what specific allegations concerning Dr Moustafa caused the IHF to take formal legal action.

International Press Association Article on IHF News Conference: http://www.aipsmedia.com/index.php?page=news&cod=1730&tp=n

German News Report with Erik Eggers being interviewed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2JuWDVUlS_4
[/html]

European Championships (The Olympic Ramifications)

[html] The Men’s World Championships took place in January 2007 and European teams took all the places and the resulting spots in Olympic Qualification tournaments. The nation which wins the European Championships, however, will receive an automatic bid to the Olympics and won’t have to play in an Olympic Qualification Tournament. As a result the exact composition of the Olympic Qualification tournaments will hinge on who wins the European Championships.

Here’s a summary of what’s at stake for each nation:

Germany: As the World Champion, they have already qualified. Where they place in the tournament has no bearing on Olympic qualification and wherever they place the teams behind them will all move up 1 spot.

Poland, Denmark, France, Croatia, Russia and Spain: These teams have already earned an Olympic Qualification Tournament bid by placing 2nd to 7th at the World Championships. Who they play and whether they will host a tournament, however, is very dependent on who wins the European Championship. The different scenarios are listed in detail at the bottom

Iceland: If Poland, Denmark, France, Croatia, Russia or Spain win the European Championship then Iceland will take the 7th place world’s position in Tourney 1. Otherwise, they are fighting for a 2nd or 3rd place finish with the teams in the next group below.

Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Norway, Montenegro, Hungary, Belarus, Slovakia or Sweden: These teams can only qualify for an Olympic Qualification Tournament by taking the 2nd or 3rd place spots in the European Championships. The good news for these teams is that all the teams that placed 2nd to 7th at the World Championships (Poland, Denmark, France, Croatia, Russia and Spain) won’t count in the standings. Additionally, should one of those teams win the European Championship, Iceland would also not be counted in the standings. This means that 9th and 10th place could actually earn the 2nd or 3rd place Europe spot. This means that teams that advance to the Main Round will likely have some meaningful games even if they don’t have a good chance at reaching the semifinals. A third place finish in one of the main round groups should earn a spot, and even a 4th or 5th place finish may be sufficient.

Detailed scenarios:

If Poland wins the European Championships
Tourney 1: Denmark, Iceland, Europe 2nd, Argentina
Tourney 2: France, Spain, Africa 2nd, Europe 3rd
Tourney 3: Croatia, Russia, Asia 2nd, Africa 3rd

If Denmark wins the European Championships
Tourney 1: Poland, Iceland, Europe 2nd, Argentina
Tourney 2: France, Spain, Africa 2nd, Europe 3rd
Tourney 3: Croatia, Russia, Asia 2nd, Africa 3rd

If France wins the European Championships
Tourney 1: Poland, Iceland, Europe 2nd, Argentina
Tourney 2: Denmark, Spain, Africa 2nd, Europe 3rd
Tourney 3: Croatia, Russia, Asia 2nd, Africa 3rd

If Croatia wins the European Championships
Tourney 1: Poland, Iceland, Europe 2nd, Argentina
Tourney 2: Denmark, Spain, Africa 2nd, Europe 3rd
Tourney 3: France, Russia, Asia 2nd, Africa 3rd

If Russia wins the European Championships
Tourney 1: Poland, Iceland, Europe 2nd, Argentina
Tourney 2: Denmark, Spain, Africa 2nd, Europe 3rd
Tourney 3: France, Croatia, Asia 2nd, Africa 3rd

If Spain wins the European Championships
Tourney 1: Poland, Iceland, Europe 2nd, Argentina
Tourney 2: Denmark, Russia, Africa 2nd, Europe 3rd
Tourney 3: France, Croatia, Asia 2nd, Africa 3rd

If Slovenia, the Czech Republic, Norway, Montenegro, Hungary, Belarus, Iceland, Slovakia or Sweden win the European Championship
Tourney 1: Poland, Spain, Europe 2nd, Argentina
Tourney 2: Denmark, Russia, Africa 2nd, Europe 3rd
Tourney 3: France, Croatia, Asia 2nd, Africa 3rd [/html]

Handball Talk: Episode 1

John Ryan and Mathias Kornes discuss the recent Women’s World Championships, the controversy surrounding the Asian Olympic Qualification Tournaments and the upcoming Men’s European Handball Championship.

Left Click to listen to the podcast on your computer or right click to download and save to your computer or MP3 player. https://teamhandballnews.com/request40.html

As referenced in the podcast here is the Korean newscast on Google video: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-908556008345758262

If you have any questions or comments concerning the podcast or suggestions for future shows send us an email at editors@teamhandballnews.com.

Just In Case You Missed It

Finland and Lithuania played a pair of matches recently as part of Europe’s Qualification for the 2009 World Championships. They split both matches and are in a 3 way battle with Bosnia to secure a spot in a playoff match later this spring. Just another match in a long qualification tournament, but be sure to check out the video of how Lithuania beat Finland in the 2nd match.

Video: http://www.yle.fi/urheilu/muut/id94237.html

Handball-World Article: http://www.handball-world.com/o.red.c/news.php?GID=1&auswahl=12604

Asian Olympic Qualification Replay (Romania Agrees to Host, but AHF Rejects Tournament)

The Romanian Handball Federation has agree to host the replay of both the Men’s and Women’s Asian Olympic Qualification tournaments. The tournaments are to be held from 28 January to 3 February. The Women will play in Bucharest and the Men will play in Oradea. Meanwhile, the Asian Handball Federation (AHF) Executive Committee met on Saturday and reportedly rejected the IHF’s request to reschedule the tournament, apparently maintaining that there were no problems with the original tournaments. There has, as yet, been no official press release from the IHF regarding this apparent stand-off.

At the center of the controversy is AHF President, Kuwait Shiekh Ahmad Al-Fahad Al-Sabah. In addition to his AHF Presidency he is also the President of the Asian Olympic overarching body, the Olympic Council of Asia and is one of the 115 members of the IOC.

Wikipedia article on Shiekh Ahmad Al-Fahad Al-Sabah: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Al-Fahad_Al-Ahmed_Al-Sabah

Sport.ro article: http://www.sport.ro/stiri/23826/Sporturi/Handbal/Asia-se-muta-in-Romania-meciurile-de-handbal-din-Cupa-Asiei-se-joaca-la-Oradea-si-Bucuresti.html

Korea Times: http://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/news/nation/2008/01/136_16759.html

Yonhap News: http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/Features/2008/01/08/64/0801000000AEN20080108002800315F.HTML

Asian Olympic Qualification Replay (IHF Requests Romania to Host)

According to Sport.ro http://www.sport.ro/stiri/23701/Sporturi/Handbal/EXCLUSIV-Romania-va-organiza-campionatul-Asiei-la-handbal.html , the IHF has requested that Romania host the Asian Olympic Qualification Replay.

Translation of article (courtesy of Bogdan Pasat):

A year after joining the EU, Romania is "moving" to Asia . Romania will host the Asian Team Handball Championship, that is.

Romania better than Mother Teresa or the Pope: chosen to squelch the biggest scandal in the world of team handball.

Romania received a fax from the IHF, requesting them country to host the Asian team handball qualification tournaments for the Olympic Games – tournaments which, as you may recall, were hosted last year but now must be replayed due to accusations of corruption.

Kazakhstan, on the women's side and Kuwait on the men's side were the tournament winners last year, upsetting the odds-on favorites – the South Koreans – who subsequently protested the tournament. The Koreans brought forth evidence – in the form of game recordings – which showed the game officials favoring the home teams. Accused of covering up a potential corruption conspiracy, the IHF was forced to take an unprecedented decision: replay both pre-Olympic tournaments.

Romania was the lone country to receive the fax from the IHF requesting them to host the new tournaments both for men and women. These tournaments will take place during the last week of January (2008) and will be hosted in two Romanian cities. Hosting expenses will be paid for by the IHF.

The Romanian Handball Federation will use the Administrative Council meeting scheduled for this coming Monday (January 7, 2007) to decide on whether it will accept or deny the offer to host the tournaments.

2007 Women’s World Championship: Comparing the Continents

This year’s World Championships had its fair share of surprises from the upstart nations outside of Europe. Here’s some analysis and numbers to back up just how each of the continents performed and where they stand relative to Europe and each other.

[b]Europe[/b]

Europe’s record vs. the Rest of the World: 31-1-10
Average Match Final Score: 31.5 – 25.0
Average Match Goal Differential: +6.5

Europe is still the top continent for sure, but the Women are not near as dominating as their male counterparts who were 28-1-1. https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.266 And, if you compare Europe’s record vs. the world for the last 3 championships a definite trend downward is occurring.

2003: 34-0-5 (87.1 win percentage)
2005: 32-0-7 (82.1 win percentage)
2007: 31-1-10 (73.8 win percentage)

In 2003, only South Korean could manage a victory against the Europeans. In 2005, Brazil joined South Korea in passing through to the main round and a raw, but athletically gifted Angola beat Slovenia and kept their other games close against the European powers. In 2007, the trend continued with 4 teams (South Korea, Angola, Brazil and Tunisia) beating European sides. Even more revealing was that the average margin of victory was only 6.5 goals. And if you were to throw out the two teams that were most overmatched, Australia and Paraguay, the number drops even further. Several teams managed to scare the Europeans and those easy games in preliminary play where teams traditionally rested are becoming fewer and fewer. All this being said, though, a 73.8 win percentage is still pretty high and the 12 European sides all finished 16th place or better.

[b]Africa[/b]

Record vs. Europe: 6-0-9
Average Match Final Score: 28.3 – 30.7
Average Match Goal Differential: -2.4

Record vs. Rest of the World (non-Europe): 4-0-1
Average Match Final Score: 32.6 – 28.4
Average Match Goal Differential: 4.2

Thanks largely to Angola’s 6-4 overall record and 5-3 record against Europe, Africa had the second best overall continental performance. And with the exception of their 27-40 loss against the eventual champions Russia, Angola was competitive in all of its matches. Even more compelling is the upward trajectory of Angolan performance from the past 3 tournaments

2003: 1-4
2005: 2-3
2007: 6-4

In 2003, Angola likely left the tournament with the realization that the European teams were better, but not that much better. In 2005 they narrowed the gap further, beating a European team (Slovenia), but they just couldn’t close the deal in their other matches. In 2007, however, they came battle tested and ready to do the little things that make the difference between winning and losing tight matches at the highest level. For those who sometime question the point of having weaker nations play mismatches against the European powers, one should consider just what Angola has accomplished. Only 5 years ago they were struggling to rebuild their nation after a 27 year civil war. According to the UN (from this New York Times article in 2003 http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?es=9C02EEDF173EF933A05754C0A9659C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=1), “80 percent of people have no access to basic medical care. More than two-thirds have no running water. A whole generation of children has never opened a schoolbook. Life expectancy is less than 40 years. Three in ten children will die before reaching their fifth birthday.”

Now five years later they are the 7th best team in the World. But it wasn’t just the Angolans that proved their worth. Congo was competitive in several games and Tunisia knocked off Austria. And in match-ups against non European teams, Africa had a 4-0-1 record with the only loss being Angola’s loss to South Korea. Time will tell whether this is the high water mark for Africa Handball or whether its just the start of a trend to bigger and better things.

[b]Asia[/b]

Record vs. Europe: 3-0-12
Average Match Final Score: 26.4 – 30.4
Average Match Goal Differential: -4

Record vs. Rest of the World (non-Europe) 7-0-4
Average Match Final Score: 31.1 -22.7
Average Match Goal Differential: +8.4

As usual, South Korea carried the flag for Asia with 3 victories over European teams and a 6th place overall finish. China and Japan kept their games vs. the Europeans respectable while Kazakhstan suffered double digit losses to Croatia and France. When it came to matches against non-European sides, Asia had a mixed record. Three of their 7 victories came at Paraguay’s expense and in 3 head to head match ups between the 2nd tier nations of Africa and Asia (Congo-Kazakhstan; Congo-Japan; Tunisia-China) they lost all 3. So Asia can look upon 2007 as some progress, but they also have to recognize that Africa is now the number 2 continent.

[b]Pan America[/b]

Record vs. Europe: 1-1-8
Average Match Final Score: 20.9 – 33.4
Average Match Goal Differential: -12.5

Record vs. Rest of the World (non- Europe): 4-0-4
Average Match Final Score: 21.4 – 25.6
Average Match Goal Differential: -4.2

In 2005 Brazil was the surprise team of the tournament with wins over Austria, Poland and France as they advanced to the Main Round for the first time and finished 8th overall. This time they were a mild disappointment as their Preliminary Round loss to Macedonia sent them to the President’s Cup and an eventual 14th place finish. The biggest consolation they can take is their Preliminary Round draw against the eventual Russian champions which showed that they can still play with the big dogs. Next time around they are sure to remember the Macedonia loss and the fact that one slip up can cost you.

Outside of Brazil, Pan-American performance was dismal, with almost all of Argentina, Dominican Republic and Paraguay defeats being lopsided double digit losses. In fact, the only non-Brazilian victories coming at the expense of Australia.

[b]Oceania[/b]

Record vs. Europe: 0-0-2
Average Match Final Score: 10 – 35
Average Match Goal Differential: -25

Record vs. Rest of the World (Non-Europe): 0-0-4
Average Match Final Score: 11.5 – 27.3
Average Match Goal Differential: -15.8

It might not seem plausible to find any silver lining in the Aussies 0-0-6 record and 24th place, but in comparison to their 2005 performance they’ve made quantifiable progress. In St Petersburg, Australia were also winless in five outings, but their opponents averaged 47.2 goals and were beaten by an average of 36.4 goals. This time around, team Australia held their opponents to a more modest 29.8 goals/game and their average margin of defeat was 18.8 goals. Big numbers for sure, but no one was able to paste a 57-7 drubbing on them like Hungary did two years ago. And for a memorable 25 minutes they held their own against Macedonia in arguably the biggest “you gotta be kidding me” moment of the tournament. Continued improvement could be a challenge, but if several players find their way to competitive European leagues it’s conceivable. Who knows? Maybe they could knock off an overconfident Angolan team four years from now.

Match Scores grouped by Continents are in the Extended Post

[b]Africa vs. Europe[/b]
Angola 33, Austria 22
Angola 26, Norway 32
Angola 29, France 27
Angola 34, Croatia 28
Angola 33, Macedonia 25
Angola 27, Russia 40
Angola 33, Germany 36
Angola 37, Hungary 36
Congo 20, Hungary 33
Congo 24, Spain 29
Congo 28, Ukraine 31
Tunisia 30, Austria 23
Tunisia 23, Poland 29
Tunisia 21, Romania 39
Tunisia 26, Ukraine 31

[b]Africa vs. Rest of World [/b]
Angola 41, Dominican Republic 20
Angola 33, South Korea 41
Congo 27, Kazakhstan 26
Congo 32, Japan 28
Tunisia 30, China 27

[b]Asia vs. Europe[/b]
China 20, Poland 27
China 29, Romania 31
Japan 31, Hungary 35
Japan 29, Spain 36
Kazakhstan 20, Austria 25
Kazakhstan 25, Croatia 35
Kazakhstan 20, France 31
South Korea 25, France 26
South Korea 31, Hungary 26
South Korea 24, Norway 35
South Korea 37, Poland 33
South Korea 27, Romania 31
South Korea 26, Spain 28
South Korea 26, Germany 32
South Korea 26, Ukraine 25

[b]Asia vs. Rest of World[/b]
China 27, Tunisia 30
China 35, Dominican Republic 16
China 23, Paraguay 14
Japan 28, Congo 32
Japan 31, Argentina 20
Japan 36, Paraguay 8
Kazakhstan 26, Argentina 22
Kazakhstan 19, Brazil 36
Kazakhstan 26, Congo 27
South Korea 41, Angola 33
South Korea 50, Paraguay 12

[b]Pan-America vs. Europe[/b]
Brazil 38, Austria 19
Dominican Republic 19, Austria 32
Argentina 18, Croatia 35
Argentina 12, France 37
Paraguay 12, Germany 45
Brazil 22, Macedonia 26
Dominican Republic 19, Norway 42
Brazil 31, Russia 31
Brazil 21, Ukraine 24
Paraguay 17, Ukraine 43

[b]Pan-America vs. Rest of World[/b]
Dominican Republic 20, Angola 41
Argentina 31, Australia 9
Brazil 36, Australia 9
Dominican Republic 26, Australia 14
Paraguay 16, Australia 14
Dominican Republic 16, China 35
Paraguay 14, China 23
Argentina 20, Japan 31
Paraguay 8, Japan 36
Argentina 22, Kazakhstan 26
Brazil 36, Kazakhstan 19
Paraguay 12, South Korea 50

[b]Oceania vs. Europe[/b]
Australia 13, Macedonia 30
Australia 7, Russia 40

[b]Oceania vs. Rest of World[/b]
Australia 9, Argentina 31
Australia 9, Brazil 36
Australia 14, Dominican Republic 26
Australia 14, Paraguay 16