Africa – Women: Angola and Tunisia qualify for the World Championship

In today's semifinals in Cairo, the two favored teams won. However, Angola's victory over Cote d'Ivoire with 27-24 was perhaps with a smaller margin than expected. By contrast, Tunisia had a very easy team against Algeria: 36-16. This means that Angola and Tunisia are already qualified for the women's World Championship in Brazil in December 2011. More immediately, they will meet in the African final on Saturday.

The final ticket to the World Championship will also be awarded on Saturday, to the winner of the bronze medal game between Cote d'Ivoire and the surprise of the event, Algeria. Congo beat the host country Egypt with 29-26 in the battle for 5th place, and Cameroon grabbed the 7th place by defeating the Dem. Rep. of Congo by the score of 30-28.

African Championships: Men's and Women's semifinals coming up

It may seem that there have not been too many surprises in the African Championships for men and women. The pre-event favorites are through to the semi-finals, generally without major difficulties. But there have still been some close and exciting games, and there is more to come,

The [u]women's[/u] semifinals will be played on Thursday: [u]Angola-Cote d'Ivoire[/u] and [u]Tunisia-Algeria[/u]; Congo did not make it, despite have had a respectable performance in the recent World Championship. Algeria is the newcomer at this level and has played an attractive handball. Angola has played well despite fielding an unusally large number of new players in comparison with recent events.

The [u]men's[/u] semi-finals will be played on Friday. Following an exciting main round match today, where Tunias and Algeria tied 21-21, [u]Tunisia[/u] came out as group winner and gets the presumably easier road to the final, playing the Democratic Rep. of the [u]Congo[/u]. The other semifinal promises to be an emotional affair, between [u]Egypt and Algeria[/u].

VIDEO: Sensational finish wins Bahrain tickets to Sweden 2011

In today’s semi-final between Bahrain-Saudi Arabia, with 7 seconds left and the game tied 25-25, the Saudis had a free-throw at the 9-meter line. Additionally, they had a 2-man advantage, so they had an excellent opportunity to win instead of having to play overtime! But with 4 seconds left, the Bahraini goalkeeper saved what was intended as the final shot, the ball rebounded out to a Bahraini court player, Saeed Jawhar, who then quickly heaved the ball the length of the court. The Saudi goalkeeper who was some distance in front of the goal couldn’t quite get back in time for the save, so the ball hit the goalpost and deflected into the net, at 29’59 !!! Bahrain won 26-25 and is through to the World Championship next January in Sweden.

VIDEO: Final seconds of Bahrain – Saudi Arabia: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VGZl3wPy888

Report in Gulf Daily News, Bahrain: http://www.gulf-daily-news.com/NewsDetails.aspx?storyid=271064

The stunned Saudi players now will have try to recharge the batteries for the third place game against Japan on Saturday, when they have one more chance to qualify.

Japan may have made a tactical mistake, trying extremely hard to keep up with the Koreans. They got close several times, but whenever that happened, the Koreans simply put in another gear and easily pulled away again. So the question is, will also Japan have spent their best efforts too soon, in a game where perhaps they did not have a serious chance. Now they also may have a tough time to come back! But it suggests that there will be tremendous fight for the remaining qualfying slot, and the Asian final between Korea and Bahrain may almost become a bit anticlimactic by comparison…

Today’s results:

Semifinal: Saudi Arabia-Bahrain 25-26
Semifinal: Korea-Japan 30-25

5th place: Qatar-Syria 31-30
7th place: Lebanon-Iran 23-35

Yesterday’s results:

9th place: China-Iraq 30-25
11th place: U.A.E.-Jordan 43-36

Check out a free podcast and promote handball

While living overseas my life changed overnight with the discovery of the world of podcasts. I’d always been a fan of talk radio, but France’s version of it left something to be desired. Even if I could actually fully understand it, I really didn’t care about Paris St-Germain and Olympic Marseille. With podcasts, however, I learned I could listen to a multitude of offerings: BBC news reports and documentaries, 60 Minutes, Meet the Press, ESPN radio and Slate Magazine. Plus, they were available anytime and anywhere. Now that I’m back in the States I’m still an avid podcast listener. Sure, there are more radio stations, but I don’t like being a slave to their schedules and annoying advertisements.

One of my favorite podcasts currently is Slate’s, ‘Hang up and Listen’. This weekly sports conversation show typically has 3 segments and lasts about 40 minutes. It’s not your typical show as they delve into topics a little off the beaten path and then spend a little more time on them. And where else do you get Team Handball references from time to time including just this past week in regards to the USOC’s funding of minor sport federations. Of course, this is entirely attributable to the number 1 Handball fan in mainstream journalism, Stefan Fatsis. Fatsis, who used to write for the Wall St Journal and can now be heard regularly on NPR, never misses an opportunity to promote the sport and has written a couple of feature articles, most recently in the NY Times.

NY Times 9 May 09: Team Handball Has It All, Except an American Interest: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/10/sports/othersports/10cheer.html?_r=1&ref=sports

While the show already gets quite a few downloads they would like to bump up their subscription numbers. Subscribing to the podcast via ITunes or downloading the show is entirely free; they just want more subscribers to impress advertisers. Where the promotion of Handball comes in is that they are having a contest to see who can come up with the best story about converting someone into a regular listener. The winner gets to be a guest analyst on the show. This posting is my plea for converts and hopefully we’ll have a windfall of Handball fans that convinces the regular hosts to bring me into their midst for a show.

Slate ‘Hang Up and Listen’ podcast page: http://www.slate.com/id/2243238/
To simply download an episode: ttp://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/media.slate.com/media/slate/Podcasts/Sports/SG10021501_HUAL.mp3
‘Hang Up and Listen’ Facebook page: http://www.facebook.com/hangupandlisten

And finally, if you’ve become a convert drop me a short note at john.ryan@teamhandballnews.com so I include you in my submission.

Saudi Arabia- Bahrain and Korea-Japan in the semifinals

In today’s four matches in the main round, most of the anticipated excitement failed to materialize. Only one match was close, namely Qatar-Saudi Arabia. Qatar had the rather impossible task of winning by at least six goals, in order to qualify for the semi-finals. They almost managed to win, but in the end they had to settle for a tie. As Japan crushed a disillusioned Iranian team, this meant that Qatar was out.

In the other group, Bahrain had absolutely no problems with home team, drawing on their experience to win easily. Syria managed to play even with Korea in the first half, mainly by using really dirty methods. In the second half, however, the Koreans pulled away and won convincingly.

The complete results and standings in the Main Round are as follows:

[u]Gr. A.[/u]
Iran – Saudi Arabia 19-26 (8-11)
Japan – Qatar 29-20 (15-10)
Iran – Qatar 21-22 (11-11)
Japan – Saudi Arabia 26-28 (12-15)
Qatar – Saudi Arabia 26-26 (12-13)
Japan – Iran 36-23 (21-11)

[b]1. Saudi Arabia [/b]5 points [b]2. Japan [/b]4 points 3. Qatar 3 points 4. Iran 0 points

[u]Gr. B.[/u]
Syria – Bahrain 31-35 (13-16)
Korea – Lebanon 38-23 (17-11)
Korea – Bahrain 39-25 (19-11)
Syria – Lebanon 32-29 (17-14)
Syria – Korea 25-35 (14-15)
Lebanon – Bahrain 18-36 (8-13)

[b]1. Korea [/b]6 points [b]2. Bahrain [/b]4 points 3. Syria 2 points 4. Lebanon 0 points

In a placement match, Iraq beat Jordan with 30-26; on Tuesday, Iraq will play against China for 9th place, and Jordan-U.A.E. will play for 11th place;

On Wednesday, Qatar and Syria will battle for 5th place, and Iran-Lebanon are playing for 7th place.

The same evening, the semifinals will be: Saudi Arabia-Bahrain and Korea-Japan. The winners qualify for the Asian final and therefore also for the 2011 World Championship. The losers will play for ‘bronze’ and for the final slot in Sweden 2011.

The results until now make it very difficult to have a firm opinion on the outcome of the Saudi Arabia-Bahrain match-up. Neither team has shown real stability, and whoever turns out to be the winner, one could not really talk about a surprise. Korea must be seen as the favorite against Japan, but in this East Asian rivalry one can never be too sure.

VIDEO: 2010 African Championships Highlights

Several videos showing highlights from matches have been posted to the 2010 African Championships Facebook page. If you click on the “Links on” page below and scroll down, you will find the youtube links.

2010 African Championship Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=191134593251&ref=ts
Links on "African Handball Championship (Egypt 2010)": http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=191134593251&share_id=321376672800&comments=1

Commentary: If you haven’t joined the Facebook universe you are definitely missing out on some unique opportunities to share information with fellow handball fans. Join our Team Handball Fans page for updates and networking: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Team-Handball-News/108817968908?ref=mf

Asian Championship: Korea remains undefeated, and Saudis surprise Japan

As expected, the start of the Main Round brought a new level of intensity, with close matches, surprises and nerves both on the court, on the benches and among spectators.

The situation after two of the three Main Round days is:

[u]Gr. A[/u]
Iran – Saudi Arabia 19-26 (8-11)
Japan – Qatar 29-20 (15-10)
Iran – Qatar 21-22 (11-11)
Japan – Saudi Arabia 26-28 (12-15)
Qatar – Saudi Arabia Mon. Feb. 15
Japan – Iran ditto

[u]Gr. B[/u]
Syria – Bahrain 32-35 (13-16)
Korea – Lebanon 38-23 (17-11)
Korea – Bahrain 39-25 (19-11)
Syria – Lebanon 32-29 (17-14)
Syria – Korea Mon. Feb. 15
Lebanon – Bahrain ditto

In a placement match, China beat U.A.E. with 28-25, and will now play for 9th place.

In yesterday’s and today’s matches, the strong comeback of the Saudi team was remarkable, after they failed to win their group in the preliminary round. In fact, the Saudis had a much more comfortable lead against Japan, before they mysteriously lost their momentum. Iran could instead be seen as a negative surprise, although it is true that they were not really tested earlier. Korea has kept ‘steamrolling’, and the Bahraini victory against Syria may turn out to be a key result.

When play resumes on Monday, all eight teams in the Main Round still maintain at least a theoretical chance to qualify for the semi-finals. Conversely, each of the eight teams still runs the risk of missing out on the semi-finals, although it would require an absolute miracle for Korea to fail, considering the very favorable goal difference against Bahrain. The Saudis are in a good position for advancing, and Japan have an edge due to strong goal difference, but the team from Qatar are not out of it. Lebanon would need to rely on Korea to keep winning, and then they would need a 4-goal win against Bahrain to squeeze into the semifinals. All in all, a very exciting finish is coming up when the Main Round concludes in Beirut.

2010 African Championships: Preliminary Round Complete

The Preliminary round is complete at the 2010 African Championships in Egypt. In the Men’s competition Tunisia, Algeria and Egypt dominated their respective pools winning all three of their matches by convincing scores. In Group A, the Democratic Republic of Congo edged Nigeria for 2nd place on goal differential as the two teams had played to a draw on the first day. Angola and Morocco are the other two sides that qualified for the Main Round. The Main Round pools are:

Group I: Tunisia, Angola, Algeria
Group II: Egypt, Democratic Republic of Congo, Morocco

Tunisia and Egypt are the odss on favorites to win their respective groups. If Algeria can take care of Angola a potential Egypt – Algeria semifinal showdown is in the offing.

Men’s Preliminary Groups (Final Standing and table of results): http://www.handball2010.com/2010/file/Position%20Of%20Men.pdf

In the Women’s competition the teams appear to be much more evenly matched. In Group A, Tunisia won all 3 of their matches, but 2nd place Cote d’Ivoire played them close, 31-27. In Group B, Angola which has dominated African competition for several years did not emerge unscathed as 2nd place Congo managed a 25-25 draw against the reigning champion. The Women’s preliminary competition did not eliminate any teams, but only set seeding for the quarterfinals. Those matches are:

Angola vs. Cameroon
Congo vs. Algeria

Tunisia vs. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Cote d’Ivoire vs. Egypt

Women’s Preliminary Groups (Final Standings and table of results): http://www.handball2010.com/2010/file/Position%20Of%20Women.pdf

USATH releases IRS documentation: First glimpse of budget numbers

USA Team Handball (USATH) has formally released its Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 990 for 2008. This form, which is an annual requiremetn for all U.S. non-profit organization, details income and expenses from July 1st 2008 to June 30th 2009, and is the first window to the fiscal status of USATH. The following is an analysis of some key data points contained on the form.

Income (Donations): USATH President Dieter Esch has backed up his promise to support the organization with a donation of $305,000. This contribution accounted for over half of USATH’s income and the organization simply would not have functioned without it. Business partner and fellow board member Brad Krassner contributed $50,000 while a 3rd board member, John West contributed $10,000. Lacking, however, is a clear indication as to whether any of the other board members have contributed any or part of the $50,000 that is stated in Section 7.26 of the by-laws as a requirement for Board Members. The end date for the form 990 is June 30th of this year, so perhaps those contributions were made after that date.

Income (Dues): USATH collected $41,117 in membership dues. This is similar to the total amount collected by the previous administration according to its last available Form 990 in 2004. As there was a significant increase in the price for annual dues, one can infer that there are now actually fewer members. It’s not surprising, however, that the new Federation would start with a low ground floor. It should be interesting to see how this metric tracks in the years to come, though, as it is a fairly reliable metric of the sports growth.

Membership dues revenue from previous IRS Form 990s
2004 $37k
2003 $42k
2002 $59K
2001 $26K
2000 $42K
(Note: I would speculate that the lower revenue in 2001 and the higher revenue in 2002 are due to some anomaly related to when the dues were collected. On average, the yearly revenue tracks closely to $40,000)

Expenses (Salaries): The USATH spent $285,279 on employee salaries and this is easily the largest expenditure of the Federation. The IRS also requires that all employees receiving compensation over $100,000 be listed by name and the General Manager of USATH, Steve Pastorino tops that mark with an overall compensation listed as $108,000. (Mr Pastorino has informed me that the yearly compensation is actually $100,000 and the extra $8,000 is due to 13 months of income). Extrapolating salaries for the other administrative personnel is difficult as several staff members were employed for only part of the year.

There are very few items of information more personal than how much money one earns in a year and in many businesses such information is held very close to the vest. U.S. non-profits, however, have stringent transparency requirements and with ready access to the internet this information is now available for all to see.

There’s a number of different ways to assess the appropriateness of the General Manager’s salary and everyone’s viewpoint is going to be influenced to some extent by their own professional experiences. Perhaps one of the more relevant comparisons is the compensation that Mike Cavanaugh received ($65,000/year) as the Executive Director back in 2004. Using a 4% inflation rate this would equate to a $73,000 salary for 2008; $100,000 equates to about a 37% pay increase. Using just those 2 data points one could come to the conclusion that either Mike Cavanaugh was undercompensated, Steve Pastorino is being overcompensated, or perhaps a mixture of both. (As a side note Mike Cavanaugh is listed as earning $24,917 in CY2008 as the new CEO of USA Table Tennis. This is, however, only for an indeterminate portion of that year. You’ll have to wait until next year to see what he makes now on an annual basis)

Out of curiosity I checked a few other sports federations to see what the top earner made. All federations are not created equal, but these numbers, inflation adjusted to 2008, do provide some insight.

USA Team Handball
Total income: $541,701
Top Salary: $100,000

Ultimate (Frisbee)
Total income: $1,236,000
Top Salary: $76,752

USA Water Polo
Total income: $4,703,000
Top Salary: $238,160

USA Field Hockey
Total income: $5,900,000
Top Salary: $263,120

USA Rugby
Total Income: $7,128,000
Top Salary: $271,000

USA Lacrosse
Total Income: $10,369,000
Top Salary: $173,000

If you compare handball to these sports, you’ll note that Mr Pastorino’s salary is substantially less with the exception of Ultimate. There are several ways to look at this.
– Salary as a ratio to total income: It can be argued that someone managing more money has greater responsibility and therefore should earn more. Using this argument Mr Pastorino’s salary is actually tops at 17% of total revenue.
– Salary requirement as an Olympic sport: The case can be made that Handball needs a base salary that is in line with the inherent prestige of other Olympic sports. In other words, if you’re going to take the sport seriously you need to have a salary comparable to other sports. Using this measure, Handball falls short of the mark.
– Salary requirement as it relates to the difficulty of the task. Anybody familiar with the challenges a minor sport like Handball faces knows full well the level of difficulty involved. A good case can be made that you don’t need just any manager, you need a super star with a proven track record of successful turnarounds. Handball probably falls short of the mark here as well and you could also bet that some top managers wouldn’t take the position at any salary, because they know that it will be tough to be successful. I’d love to put the head of USA basketball in charge of USA Handball and see how well that individual does in a more challenging situation.

In the end, there’s no automatic calculator that can decide what the appropriate compensation should be. It’s maybe a little more than I would have thought, but it’s in the ballpark. The bottom line is that the salary decision was Dieter Esch’s and since he contributed $305,000 to the organization one can only assume it was a decision that he was comfortable with.

Other Expenses: The Federal Statement at the end of the package identifies $168,975 in other expenses. This section is a hodgepodge of different expenses, but 3 items are worth noting:
Travel: $65,754
National Team Expenses: $7,071
USA Club Competition Expenses: $36,058

It’s hard to imagine Travel and National Team Expenses remaining so low in the future. For the time frame indicated there was only limited activity in those areas and these are sure to increase substantially in future statements. USA club competition expenses are probably in line with the costs of conducting a National Championship tournament. It will be interesting to track this in the years to come. Also as more training camps and other development activities are conducted I hope that future documentation highlights the spending in these areas more clearly.

The overall numbers: $540,000 to run a national federation is going to result in a shoestring operation. It’s hardly enough revenue to do a few things well, let alone enough to do everything that needs to be done. This number has got to get larger and USA Team Handball is working diligently to make that happen through engagement with international entities and the USOC. We can and should expect this bottom line number to increase from year to year so that it approaches the funding of some of the other sports organization listed above.

Closing thoughts: These numbers don’t tell the full story, but do set some initial benchmarks. I have had some limited dialogue with Steve Pastorino on these topics as well as opportunity to review a rough draft of planning documents that look towards the future. Hopefully, this information will be posted soon to the USA Team Handball website and will provide better insight as to the fiscal health and planning envisioned.

Full disclosure: I sent Dieter Esch an unsolicited letter expressing interest in the USA Team Handball General Manager position shortly after USA Team Handball was certified by the USOC in 2008. I was never interviewed and it’s probably unlikely that I would have accepted employment due to a number of personal and professional considerations. I’m also not surprised that Mr Esch hired someone he knew with a sports management background and very importantly no ties to the fractious politics that have afflicted the sport in the U.S. I think that my commentaries on USA Team Handball are fair and backed with reasoned arguments, but readers will have to judge for themselves as to whether my previous interest in employment clouds my critiques.

USA Team Handball Form 990 (1998): http://usateamhandball.org/assets/documents/attached_file/filename/20855/2008_USA_Team_Handball_Form_990.pdf
Guidestar: www.guidestar.org (Free service which provides access to IRS Form 990s for all U.S. Non-Profits)

2010 African Championships Underway

The Men’s and Women’s African Handball Championships started today in Egypt. The men’s competition consists of 12 teams and is divided into 3 groups. The Women’s competition features 8 teams divided into 2 groups. Three teams from each competition will qualify for the 2011 World Championships.

In the Men’s tournament Egypt and Tunisia will be favored to qualify, while a number of teams will be contenders for the 3rd spot. In the Women’s tournament Angola will be expected to dominate while the other teams will scramble for the 2nd and 3rd spots.

As a side note, Algeria’s delegation was given a warm welcome upon their arrival in Cairo. Security concerns as a result of riots following a soccer World Cup Qualifier between the two rivals had prompted Egypt to initially withdraw from hosting the tournament. This Egypthandball.com report includes photos showing that they were greeted with flowers: http://www.egypthandball.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=739:2010-02-11-02-23-54&catid=932:egypt&Itemid=67

THN (6 Dec 09): Egypt reverses decision: Will host African Championships after all: https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.898

African Handball Championships Official Website: http://www.handball2010.com/2010/index.php?pg=hb5

Results for Thursday, 11 February

Men

Group A (Suez)
Democratic Republic of Congo – Nigeria 27-27
Tunisia – Libya 43-24

Group B (Cairo)
Angola – Cameroon 25-22
Egypt – Gabon 27-21

Group C (Cairo)
Algeria – Cote d’Ivoire 29-11
Morocco – Congo 27-24

Women

Group A (Cairo)
Cote d’Ivoire – Algeria 22-19
Tunisia – Cameroon 25-19

Group B (Suez)
Congo – Democratic Republic of Congo 37-31
Angola – Egypt 32-21

Asian Championship: Preliminary round completed

The last two days of the group play offered, as expected, some excitement in important games between evenly matched teams. The results were:

Gr. A Saudi Arabia-China 20-22
Gr. D Iran-Lebanon 25-16
Gr. B Japan-Bahrain 31-27
Gr. C Korea-Qatar 29-23

This means that China failed to qualify for the main round, but it was really close. China needed to win by 4 goals and had a 3-goal lead close to the end, but that was as close as it got. The new Chinese team will now have more time to gain experience in time for future events. In the meantime, Syria (as group winner) and Saudi Arabia are in the main round.

Iran gained a rather comfortable victory against Lebanon. The home team again got good crowd support, but they were simply a bit too thin in comparison with a more solid and experienced adversary. But Lebanon is still in the main round as a runner-up, after the earlier victory against Jordan.

The young Japanese team now played a more convincing game against the Bahrainis, who are never an easy opponent. However, both teams could play without nerves, as they had both beaten the Iraqi team earlier. Japan is now the group winner.

Today’s drama came in the Korea-Qatar encounter. It was one of those awkward situations, where one team (U.A.E.) can just sit and watch, hoping for the best. And conversely, one could say that Korea had the fate of both teams in their hands, after having previously beaten U.A.E. with 30-23. As the Qatar-U.A.E. game ended in a tie, precisely 30-23 was now a pivotal result in today’s game, as this would have made it necessary to resort to a coin toss for the final main round place. And it came close, as Korea’s lead oscillated between 6 and 9 goals. But the final result was 29-23. Surely a somewhat bitter ending for the U.A.E, but at least the coin toss was avoided…

The main round starts on Saturday and goes on for three days with round-robin play in the following two groups; the best two in each group advance to the semifinals, with a chance for the three slots in the 2011 World Championship. One could say that this is where the Championship really starts:

Gr. A: Iran, Japan, Qatar and Saudi Arabia
Gr. B: Korea, Syria, Lebanon and Bahrain

The ‘consolation matches’ include China-U.A.E on Sunday and Iraq-Jordan on Monday; the winners later play for 9th place and the losers for 11th place.

IOC President Rogge comments on Moustafa's contract with Sportfive

In an in-depth interview published in Neue Zuercher Zeitung today, two days prior to the opening of the Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver, IOC President Jacques Rogge anwers a broad spectrum of questions, many of a political nature or related to the role and responsibilities of the IOC. http://www.nzz.ch/nachrichten/kultur/film/wir_koennen_nicht_alle_probleme_dieser_welt_loesen_1.4892027.html

In this interview, the IOC President is asked very specifically about his views on the recently reported https://teamhandballnews.com/news.php?item.933 revelation that IHF president Moustafa had a lucrative personal contract with Sportfive, at the same time as this company had acquired the TV rights for all IHF events.

At first, the IOC President attempts to avoid the question, by saying that "Moustafa is not an IOC member; therefore it is not up to us to take any measures.' However, when the interviewer follows up with a hypothetical question, "but what if Moustafa had been an IOC member?". [u]The answer from the IOC President is very clear: "In that case I surely would not tolerate such a behavior."[/u] It should be noted that this is in sharp contrast with Moustafa's defense that he had sought clearance from the IOC Ethics Commission.

And just what problems does the IHF have (or anticipate) with CAS?

A puzzling article suddenly appeared on the IHF web site a couple of days ago. http://www.ihf.info/front_content.php?idcat=57&idart=2553 It came ‘out of the blue’ and it would be interesting to know what the IHF (read: its president) believes it has at stake here. It is stated that the IHF met with representatives of other international federations (IFs) for team sports, and that these (or all?) IFs have joined together, in collaboration with the IOC (!!) to express its concerns with/to CAS (the Court of Arbitration in Sports) in a formal letter.

It was claimed that ‘more and more decisions of Executive Committees and Congresses of IFs are appealed to CAS,’ and it was argued in the letter to CAS that “such appeals obviously undermine the authority of the IFs”. Superficially, such concerns may seem legitimate but, if one is familiar with the background, then they may seem rather farfetched and either laughable or scary, depending on how one wants to interpret the claims.

CAS was established in 1983, at the initiative of the then IOC president Samaranch, as a specialized body to resolve disputes involving issues such as eligibility, sports governance and doping, outside the normal court system. It plays a particular in role relation to issues regarding the Olympic Games. For the most part, the issues that come before the CAS are handled in ways similar to those of normal court cases, with written submissions, hearings, and a careful review of applicable laws and regulations. Most cases heard by CAS take the form of appeals, after the normal appeals mechanisms within an IF have been exhausted, but CAS also handles mediation cases and provides advice upon request. The web site of CAS offers a wealth of information about its rules and its operations. http://www.tas-cas.org/news

As far as the IHF is concerned, the experience with CAS is limited to one case only, but an absolutely infamous one, viz., the scandalous manipulations in the Asian qualification tournaments for the 2008 Olympics in Beijing. Here the IHF Council found it necessary to set aside the results of both the men’s and the women’s events due to clear indications of an orchestration of heavily biased refereeing and other forms of fraudulent behavior. The IHF decision was appealed by the Asian Federation and the nations that had ‘won’ the events that the IHF decided to annul. The IHF president then took upon himself, in collaboration with the Asian president, to bring the matter straight to CAS for resolution, even though the internal IHF appeals mechanisms had not been used. In other words, it was the IHF specifically asking CAS to become involved, and anything else would have been impossible under the CAS statutes. Then it is a different matter that the revelations during the CAS proceedings ended up being most embarrassing for the IHF president… THN report at the time: https://teamhandballnews.com/comment-n380.html the complete text of the CAS decision: http://jurisprudence.tas-cas.org/sites/CaseLaw/Shared%20Documents/1483.pdf

FIFA’s experience with CAS is a bit more extensive. Perhaps the most awkward case, from FIFA’s vantage point, involves the issue of releasing players under the age of 23 for the 2008 Olympics. Some clubs, for instance FC Barcelona in the case of Messi, refused to release their player. FIFA got up on ‘high horses’, referring partly to a Committee decision and partly to ‘well-established practices’. CAS, however, did not accept the validity of the FIFA committee decision, and simply noted that the ‘well-established practices’ could not be seen as prevailing inasmuch as they directly contradicted relevant clauses in FIFA’s own regulations. This was at the time a rather embarrassing defeat for the FIFA and its president Blaetter. Moreover, it is well known that FIFA, possibly even more strongly than the IOC, constantly asserts its autonomy and lashes out against member countries with accusations and punishments regarding government interference in matters of federations and clubs. Clearly, FIFA must be just as unhappy with any notion that CAS might be inclined to question FIFA decisions and intervene in its decision-making.

But comparatively, it is absolutely astounding, if it is indeed correct, that IOC is now also expressing concerns about the role of CAS. As noted at the outset, CAS exists at the initiative of IOC, and the concerns in the early days were just the opposite of what now is being alleged. CAS was seen as too closely linked to IOC and therefore had its credibility and impartiality questioned. Decisions had to be taken, especially regarding financing and administration, which demonstrated a higher degree of independence. Even so, CAS was earlier often accused of being rather reticent in its role. So it would be a truly remarkable turnaround if the IOC now was seen as accusing CAS of being excessively active and involved.

Let me go back to the question of possible reasons for the IHF to participate in action against CAS, and in fact being the only team sport IF currently even mentioning the issue in public. It might be a sufficient reason to support initiatives that are close to the heart of the ‘role model’ FIFA/Blaetter (a very unfortunate choice, but nevertheless), and it might be ‘politically correct’ to support action that is said to be embraced by the IOC. (See also the recent IHF decision to suspend Kuwaiti handball http://www.ihf.info/front_content.php?idcat=57&idart=2424 ).

But the precise issue that saw FIFA overruled by CAS may also provide a hint. IHF has recently asserted its position (as reflected in its Transfer Regulations) that clubs worldwide must accept to release, without compensation, players for World Championships. This IHF position is already being appealed in civilian courts and the European Union. Could IHF be concerned about getting also CAS as an adversary in such matters? But this seems highly unrealistic, as CAS does not have the mandate to get involved in setting aside existing IHF regulations. Is it instead just an effort to try to eliminate one of the few existing forms of external scrutiny, in matters where the IHF does [u]not[/u] wish to follow its regulations or where it does not want it autonomy/autocracy challenged!!??