Gary Phillips is one of the best prospects to ever come out of a USA Collegiate Handball club. Earlier this month he led West Point to a 17th straight Collegiate Handball title and was selected as the tournament MVP. At the IHF Emerging Nations Championships he was selected to the all star team. An unprecedented accomplishment for a handball athlete still in college.
I sat down with Gary during the Collegiate Championships to learn more about his background and plans for the future. Here are some of the topics we discussed:
Air Force upsetting West Point in Pool Play (West Point came back in knockout play to win their 17th straight collegiate championships)
Phillips on attack vs North Carolina; Photo courtesy of Rod Apfelbeck
The three players in the past 40 years that had John saying, “Who the hell is that guy…”
Playing on the national team with Americans who’ve learned handball in another country
Playing at the Jr World Championships in 2023 with “glue” and against more experience goalies
Playing with the Sr National Team at the Emerging Nations Championships in March and getting selected as the all-star right wing
Playing right back vs playing right wing
Gary’s backgound and being recruited to playing QB for West Point football
Transititioning from American football to handball
West Point competing at Club Nationals in May
Gary’s chances of joining the Army’s World Class Athlete Program (WCAP)
The challenge Europeans sometime have in properly assessing the potential of stateside Americans who started playing handball at older ages
How playing for a top club on a daily basis can accelerate player development
Watch on YouTube or listen/download the mp3 file at the top of the page.
If you have any suggestions for future topics that you would like us to consider please let us know on social media.
Don’t miss an episode:
Subscribe on YouTube: Link (Earliest Availability)
(The analog scoreboard on Court 3 at College Nationals: Not electronic and missing some numbers)
As Usual: Spirited Competition
This past weekend, as I usually do, I attended the Collegiate Handball National Championships. The competition was spirited and didn’t disappoint. From my perspective here are a few notable highlights:
My alma mater, Air Force, defeated West Point in pool play for the first time in several years only to see West Point re-assert themselves in the knockout stages for yet another title. (17 in a row, now)
Meanwhile in women’s play, North Carolina knocked off West Point in the Gold Medal match to end the West Point women’s streak at 4 titles
In Men’s Division 2 play, a new side, Kentucky, ran through the tournament undefeated to take the title over Case-Western. It’s nice to see a new program do so well. And, a shout out to Josh Palmer of Colorado State who did a solid job as a newcomer GK playing for Case-Western. Maybe we’ll see the CSU Rams there next year.
Beyond the play on the court, though, there were some organizational challenges. Here’s a list of what I observed:
Court 3, which was only used on Friday night, didn’t have an electronic scoreboard so the match time was kept by phone and the score had to be kept with the rotating strips. (see photo)
Adding insult to injury the analog score strips were missing a one and a zero… hence the post-it note.
Referees weren’t always on time for match start… but, they were always found without too much delay
Volunteers for scorekeeping weren’t always available… hence my stepping in to the void on Friday night
The cameras for video streaming weren’t always set up for operation
And, when the cameras were set up, they weren’t always manned… hence my stepping in on several occasions
And, the matches were streamed online at some non-traditional website locations, but the price (free) was right
I saw a set of handball goals fall apart on a couple of occasions. Nothing major and nothing a wrench couldn’t fix
Same as it ever was
It’s been quite a few years since I organized a handball tournament, but I still remember what it’s like. And, if you’ve ever organized or even just attended a few handball tournaments, none of what I described should surprise you. Those sorts of things happen. Sometimes the event goes off without a hitch, but usually there are a few hiccups. And, then on occasion (like this past weekend) things add up and it can make the event look at times like a bit of a train wreck. However, in almost 40 years of observing handball tournaments, our handball community pretty much always finds a way to cross the finish line. There’s always complaining, but folks generally step in to help and right the ship. This has been true whether it was a tournament under the old US Team Handball Federation, USA Team Handball, the short lived US Handball Union or at independent events sanctioned by no one.
I’ll now take my 40 year timeline and zoom in on the last 3 seasons. The 2022-23 season organized under USA Team Handball CEO, Martin Branick, the 2023-24 season organized by US Handball Union Director, Michael King and the 2024-25 season organized by USA Team Handball CEO Michael King.
During those 3 seasons I attended a SoCal Beach Handball Championships, 3 Samala Cups in Colorado and 3 Collegiate National Handball Championships. And, I also watched quite a few matches online over the past 3 years. I don’t want to pretend like I was some IG inspector walking around with a clipboard meticulously grading organizational performance using carefully established criteria, but in my opinion there’s not a whole lot to separate the organizational standards of the past 3 years. If anything, last weekend’s college nationals puts this season below the other two seasons, but the sample size is still pretty small, and, as I highlighted previously sometimes things happen.
In very simple terms: Nothing has really changed and I don’t think there was much of a problem in the first place. Collectively, we know how to run a U.S. style weekend tournament. (Maybe, we should rethink whether we should be conducting so many weekend tournaments… but, that’s a commentary for another day.)
Was it all worth it?
So, if I’m a bit generous, and assess that nothing has changed organizationally, the rhetorical question is “Was it all worth it?” And, by “it” I’m referring to the whole crazy sequence of events from the creation of the US Handball Union to the unorthodox firing of Martin Branick and his immediate replacement with Michael King. And, of course, all the Board resignations and reputational damage that USA Team Handball garnered in the process. Well, the answer is so obvious it doesn’t even really need to be answered. I mean we’re talking some serious rationalization here, if you’re firmly in the “Yes, it absolutely was worth it” camp. Because 7 months into the new era… there’s not a whole lot to show for.
And, if you’re in the “Yes, eventually it will all make sense, but it will take some time” camp that blames the current situation on the challenges that were inherited let me clear up something for you. It’s true that any newcomer inherits the problems (and successes) of his predecessor. And, under normal hiring circumstances it’s reasonable to have to some sort of grace period before progress is expected. But, when one comes into a role under very abnormal circumstances… There really shouldn’t be any grace period. This is because the justification for blowing everything up is that things have gone totally to hell in a handbasket… and the newcomer is clearly going to be so much better that we can’t wait or be bothered with a normal hiring process. That any additional, self inflicted new challenges caused by the disruption will be small potatoes in the big scheme of things. Otherwise, you just wouldn’t risk taking such action. It just couldn’t possibly be worth it.
And, while we’re just talking about tournament organization here, if one believes the Board of Director Meeting Minutes from last year the whole US Handball Union situation was the catalyst that eventually led to 3.5 board members deciding to blow everything up. Or… maybe it was just ostensibly the reason given so that other changes could be made? Regardless… it all just has me shaking my head.
The USA Women’s Sr National Team is participating in the 2025 North American & Caribbean (NORCA) Champhionships. The tournament is being played at the Mexican Olympic Training Center in Mexico City. The five participating teams will play a round robin and then the top 2 teams will play a gold medal match and the the 3rd and 4th place teams will play for bonze. The winner of the tournament will qualify for the 2025 IHF Women’s World Handball Championships in December in Germany/Holland. Matches are being live streamed on the Mexician Olympic Committe and Handball Store Mexico Facebook pages.
In 2018, the IHF Council made a decision to award wild card qualifications to the USA Men and USA Women for the 2025 and 2027 IHF Handball World Championships. The rationale for the decision was to support the development of the USA National Teams in preparation for the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles. (2018 IHF Council Minutes, pages 8-9) This has been widely known for several years and from a USA perspective knowing that the U.S. could count on participation and gaining experience in two major tournaments in the lead up to the Olympics was reasurring. Many sites like the Wikipedia page for the 2025 Women’s World Championships had “penciled” in the USA as one of the already qualified nations.
A Quiet Omission and an Important Condition
Eariler this week, however, the IHF published a news article highlighting an IHF Council decision on 27 March to award a wild card to China for the 2025 World Championships. Quietly absent from the article, however, was a passing mention of the other Wild Card that had been awarded to the USA.
I contacted both the IHF and USA Team Handball for clarification. I haven’t heard back yet from USA Team Handball, but the IHF confirmed that the IHF Council has not awarded the 2nd wild card yet. And, a closer look at the wording for the original IHF Council decision in 2018 includes an important caveat or condition to the wild card award. Namely the award is conditional on the USA national teams having “reached a certain performance level”
What Does a “Certain Performance Level” Mean?
With the October 2018 IHF Council Minutes stating that the USA National Teams will be awarded a wild card provided that they have reached a “certain performance level” one can strongly infer that the IHF Council has assessed that the USA Women have not reached that level. While that level is not defined in any way, it’s hard, if not impossible, to argue that recent results have been satisfactory. Since the 2019 PANAM Games the USA Women have failed to win a match in official competition. And, these are not losses to good or even mediocre European sides. No, these are losses to peer competition in our region, the weakest handball region in the world.
Upcoming NORCA Championship: An Opportunity to Show Potential
All is not lost for the USA Women. Next week they will be competing in the North American & Caribbean Handball Championships, where the tournament winner will receive an automatic bid for the World Championships. I haven’t seen a roster yet, but perhaps with some new players and a new coach, the team can surprise and take home a title. And, barring that show some promise and potential to IHF Council members that will be watching from afar. Maybe the U.S. can even show enough potential to merit a “certain peformance level.” After all, that open wild card has not been awarded to another nation yet.
The USA Women’s Jr National Team is participating in a North American & Caribbean Qualification tournament for the Jr PANAM Games. The tournament is being played at the Mexican Olympic Training Center in Mexico City. The top 3 teams will qualify for the Jr PANAM games in Asuncion, Paraguay from 9 to 23 August, 2025. Matches are being live streamed on the Mexician Olympic Committe and Handball Store Mexico Facebook pages.
The USA Men’s National Team is participating in the IHF Emerging Nations Championship. This page is intended to serve as a handy reference point for the tournament
On 12 February, 2025, the USA Team Handball Board of Directors held their monthly meeting and I recorded the open public portion of the meeting. The meeting started out with a seemingly mundane discussion regarding a proposed new member, Margaret Rubin for the Nominating and Governance Committee.
However, I was agape to find out that Rubin, who also serves on the Judiciary Committee had a 7-8 year relationship with USA Team Handball CEO, Michael King. This is relevant because she had played a pivotal role in 3-2 Judiciary Committee decision that prevented the board from reviewing Board decisions that had taken place while Ebiye Udo-Udoma had been improperly removed from the Board. Which, of course, included the infamous 3-2 board decision to remove Martin Branick from the CEO position and immediately replace him with King. The entire sequence of events can be seen here: Link
This podcast focuses on the most recent revelation and some of the inherent problems with the way everthing went down this past summer. Yes, if your “means” to achieve your “ends” is crappy enough… you don’t get the ends you thought you were getting.
Watch on YouTube or listen/download the mp3 file at the top of the page.
If you have any suggestions for future topics that you would like us to consider please let us know on social media.
Don’t miss an episode:
Subscribe on YouTube: Link (Earliest Availability)
The USA Men participated in their second straight World Championships this past January and finished in 26th place with 3 wins and 4 losses. At first glance this doesn’t look like a great tournament result. After all, at the 2023 World Championships the U.S. made the main round and finished in 20th place. But, while the end result was a lower overall ranking, the body of work this time was, in my opinion, clearly better. Here’s a look at how the U.S. did in all 7 matches.
Match by Match Review
Preliminary Round
Portugal – USA 30-21 (15-10): The outcome of this match was never in doubt, but the U.S. made the eventual 4th place Portuguese work the whole way.
Norway – USA 33-17 (13-7): This was clearly the worst U.S. performance of the tournament… But, after Norway lost their first match vs Brazil, was there any doubt that the hosts would do everyting in their power to right the ship and take out their frustration?
Brazil – USA 31-24 (10-12): The U.S. led at the half and the match was tied at 18-18 with twenty minutes left. A remarkable performance against a Brazil side that edged out both Norway and Sweden for a QF slot. While Brazil dominated the final twenty minutes playing a world top 8 team to a standstill for forty minutes was a great confidence booster. One that hopefully serves as a stepping stone to an eventual 60 minute result against a top side.
President’s Cup
USA – Japan 27-25 (15-13): While Japan was missing some key players many players on their roster had just played in the Olympics this past summer and had been part of Japan’s successful Asian qualification. Not a top European side, but an experienced side that had played some big matches. The U.S. trailed early, but came back and led most of the way. Most importantly, they took control of the match in crunch time.
USA – Cuba 27-26 (14-15): Against their continental rivals the U.S. played a subpar match and even fell behind 4 goals (15-19 early in the 2nd half. But, the U.S. didn’t panic and eventually took a 24-23 lead with 9 minutes. Again… the U.S. was the better team in crunch time. Poised, they found a way to win when they weren’t having their best day. And, that’s what confident sides do.
USA – Bahrain 30-28 (15-14): At the 2023 World Championships Bahrain defeated the U.S 32-27. The match was not a blowout, but Bahrain was clearly the better side. This time around the U.S. was the better team and (we have a theme here) the better team in crunch time.
25th Place (President’s Cup Title Match)
Poland – USA 24-22 (11-13) (10-8) (3-1) : Heading into this match the U.S. was a 7.5 goal underdog and the odds of an outright victory were 13-1 against. Poland is no longer a top European side, but their handball history is decidedly superior to the U.S. But, none of that mattered and the U.S. held a lead in the 54th minute only to see the match end in a regular time draw (21-21). The U.S. then came up short in the penalty shootout. Sure, I would have preferred a title, but all things considered, that’s a solid performance.
Overall Team Assessment
Over the course of two weeks the USA Men played 7 teams of varied experience and talent levels. We didn’t know it going into the tournament, but based on the final rankings of the teams participating, Group E (Portugal (4th), Brazil (7th), Norway (10th) and the USA (26th)) was the strongest Preliminary Group in the Tournament. And, then against peer nations in the President’s Cup, the U.S. won all three of their 3 group play matches and played to a draw in the President’s Cup final, only to lose on penalties.
Betting lines are by no means official, but it’s telling that the U.S. covered the goal handicap spread in 5 of their 7 matches, only failing to cover versus Norway and Cuba. And, in two cases, against Japan and Bahrain they won matches relatively comfortably agains teams they were expected to lose to by 3 or 4 goals. By these numbers, there is no debate… The U.S. repeatedly exceed expectations.
How did the U.S. do it? Well, here are some of the reasons that I think are behind the team’s success.
Solid defense: The U.S. gave up an average of 27.7 goals/match. The IHF doesn’t provide a handy ranking for this metric, but a quick review of match scores for the teams the U.S. played shows that the U.S. held their opponents to fewer goals than their average. While some of this might be attributable to the somewhat methodical U.S. offense, keep in mind that same offense also had it’s fair share of turnovers. In fact, if one takes out the resultant fast break goals, the U.S. set defense (dare, I say it?) approaches the defense played by some of the top teams. It approaches… it’s not quite there yet. But, if one is trying to understand how the U.S. was tied with Brazil with 20 minutes left… it’s good defense combined with fewer turnovers on offense.
And, the defense starts with a center block of Domagoj Srsen and Patrick Hueter with Drew Donlin and Paul Skorupa filling in with no real drop in performance. Yes, 4 big, physical guys that are largely interchangeable and familiar with each other’s play. Throw in Ian Hueter and Abou Fofana playing pretty good “2” defense as well and it’s very capable defense
Reliable wing scoring: I’ll be doing a more indepth position by position review, but right wing, Sean Corning and left wing, Sam Hoddersen provided consistent scoring both on the wing and fast breaks
Crunch time leadership: Center back 1a, Ian Hueter and center back 1b, Alex Chan kept the team poised in crunch time. Games the U.S. might have lost in the past due to mistakes, are now games we are winning.
A core group with several years of shared experiences: Back in 2018 at a PANAM Games qualifier, I saw a backcourt of Abou Fofana, Ian Hueter and Gary Hines make short work of a Canadian side that had beaten the U.S. a few months earlier. More players have been added and roles have changed, but a talented core group has now been together for several years… and, it shows. We aren’t the team that has to figure out how to play and work together a week before the tournament. We are the the team that already knows what to do.
When determining an overall grade for this U.S. team I guess one could simply say 26th out of 32 teams and think C-, at best. And, for sure, I would love for the U.S. to be a side that makes the Main Round, the Quarterfinals and play for medals. But, I think it’s more appropriate to take the talent level of the team into account and match it to expectations.
Overall, this is a team with some talented athletes. Competitive, pretty good athletes, but no individual athletes with the talent that makes them can’t miss, top club professionals. However, when you combine these individuals into a team, the sum is greater than the individual parts. And, it is why their performance repeatedly exceeded expectations and is a performance that I think deserves an A+ grade overall.
Coming up: I’ll provide a more indepth position by position review and I’ll also start looking ahead towards 2028.
(John Ryan on defense against Magnus Wislander at the 1993 World Championships)
Magnus Wislander played 384 international matches for Sweden and is considered one of the all time great handball players. Two of those 384 matches were against the U.S. at the 1993 World Championships and the 1996 Olympics. He was in Oslo at the 2025 World Championship for Swedish Radio and by chance, we were both asking ourselves the same question: How would the U.S. national team of the 1990s fare against the current U.S. National Team? This short 3:30 minute discussion addresses that question and how the game has changed in the past 30 years.
Commentaries from 2023 comparing the 1993 and 2023 USA National Teams
Two Handball World Championships in Sweden Separated by 30 years (Part 1): Nostalgia and and a Little Bit of Deja Vu: Link
Two Handball Championships in Sweden Separated by 30 Years (Part 2): From 0% to 83% Dual Citizens- Does that Matter?: Link
Watch on YouTube or listen/download the mp3 file at the top of the page.
If you have any suggestions for future topics that you would like us to consider please let us know on social media.
Don’t miss an episode:
Subscribe on YouTube: Link (Earliest Availability)
(Pro Handball USA press conference; photo from Fredericia Avisen)
Yesterday, Pro Handball USA, held a press conference and kick-off event in Herning, Denmark to introduce the new organization to the Handball world. With the theme, “America Deserves Handball” Pro Handball USA will first seek to bring pro clubs to the U.S. for matches as part of a summer tournament in 2026 and is targeting a U.S. based pro league for 2028. According to one report on the press conference, Barcelona and Paris-SG have committed to participate in the a summer 2026 tournament which will take place over 10 days in Las Vegas.
Of note, unlike previous pro handball related this effort is focused on both men’s and women’s pro handball and will also include a community based effort “The Handball Frontier.”
Attending the press conference, was the Pro Handball USA CEO, Mads Winther, USA Team Handball CEO, Mike King, IHF Executive Committee Member, Narcisa Lecusanu and two Pro Handball USA ambassadors, Mikkel Hansen and Stine Oftedal.
Here are a few articles related to the press conference:
Mikkel Hansen and the stars’ plans for handball in the USA: Link
Mikkel Hansen wants to make handball an American sport: Link
I’m not naive to think that it will happen overnight, says Mikkel Hansen: Link
This is what Mikkel is doing now: – I’m not going to the USA to live: Link
Hey, media person, just discovering handball: Think you’ve got a “new idea“ on how the U.S. can win Olympic Handball Gold? Think again… Check out these articles dating back from 1996.
This past weekend the New York City Team Handball Club beat the hosts, Denver Wolves in a shoot out to take the Samala Cup title. Their stand out performer was the tournament MVP, 21 year old, right back, Togba Aboubacar. After the tournament I sat down with Togba to discuss his handball journey and his remarkable life journey from Guinea to the U.S.
Here’s a summary with links to some of the items we discussed:
His handball beginnings in Guinea and playing for the U18 National Team there
His finding the NYC Team Handball Club after a few false starts with wall handball
How NYC has taken the concept of “club family” to a higher level
Unrest in Guinea which led to his decision to move to the U.S. at the tender age of 16 and living in foster care
Togba’s essay about helping someone in a wheel chair: Link
Learning English
On being a nursing student and his goal to eventually become a doctor
On becoming an American citizen and playing for the U.S. National Team
On possibly playing handball in Europe
Watch on YouTube or listen/download the mp3 file at the top of the page
If you have any suggestions for future topics that you would like us to consider please let us know on social media.
Subscribe on YouTube: Link (Earliest Availability)
Or use this RSS Feed to sign up for the podcast in your favorite podcast aggregator: Link
And, be sure to check out the podcast archive with interviews and great handball discussion going all the way back to 2006: LinkPosted in College Handball, Handba
Has the lack of information provided regarding a wild sequence of events been a brazen disregard of transparency or has it simply been the justifiable limits of information sharing?
The 85-10-5 Rule of Thumb
When you write about handball in the United States for nearly 20 years you learn a few things about where the sport is situated relative to all the other sports in this country. In terms of pecking order, team handball is very near the very bottom. Aside from our quadrennial increase in awareness due to the Olympics very few Americans care or even give a second thought about handball.
And, then, even within our very small community of handball devotees, the people who really care about the governance and handball politics of our sport is an even smaller number of people. Based on experience/observation, I would assess that of the 1,000 or so people who care about handball in this country around 85% could care less about who’s running the sport. They just want to play, coach, ref or watch. Their only question is typically, “Just tell me where to send my money.” Another 10%, if pushed, will engage some. Typically, this is a coach or team leader, that recognizes that the top level organization of the sport impacts what they are doing. They don’t like getting involved, but they understand that somebody on their team has to, to some extent. Essentially, they dip a toe in the water and then get out of that water as quickly as they can.
And, then there is the 5% that genuinely care about the politics and governance of the sport. They care about who is in charge of what and they care about what is planned in terms of grass roots development, national team performance, marketing efforts and other organizational matters. As to why they care, that answer varies. Sometimes it’s simply personal… they want to be in charge of something. Sometimes it’s out of frustration… they don’t like how things have been done and want to see changes. And, almost always… it’s because they are truly very passionate about the sport of handball.
So the 85-10-5 Rule of Thumb is:
85% don’t care about governance and politics at all and are very unlikely to to get involved.
10% care somewhat about governance and politics and they will get involved if they need to,
5% genuinely care about governance and politics and they get involved as much as they can.
So we could quibble about the percentages. Maybe it’s 80-10-10 or 90-8-2 or some other variation, but if you’ve been around awhile… you’re probably thinking that it’s a pretty accurate binning of our small community.
Can the 5% be Ignored?
If there are around 1,000 people who care about handball in the U.S. this means that only around 50 people are fully engaged in political/governance matters. Or to put it another way only around 50 people would really be interested in finding out more about something like the “sequence of events” sooner and in greater detail. Heck, I’ve even been told before that this number is even smaller and that I (John Ryan) am literally the only person that cares. I don’t think that’s quite true, but the number is small enough that a brazen total disregard for basic transparency has at times been a very effective strategy for USA Team Handball. Yes, if USA Team Handball wants to do something shady/unorthodox/questionable and not tell anyone about it… there’s a solid chance that no one will be the wiser. But… just because that’s an effective strategy… doesn’t make it right!
Outside Entities: Also Left in the Dark?
Beyond the small USA Handball Community there are also other players that probably have been left in the dark. The USOPC has been informed via grievances, but one wonders if the IHF and USA Team Handball’s largest sponsor, Verizon would also liked to have been fully informed as to what had been taking place. Certainly, one can speculate as to whether any lower level concern that those entities might have had regarding disputes between the Handball Union and USA Team Handball would have been easily trumped by higher concerns regarding an unorthodox “sequence of events” that was unfolding.
The Lack of Transparency
Here’s a chronicling… of some significant events that either have never been mentioned or were reported only long after they happened as a news items on the USA Team Handball website:
No mention whatsover regarding the multiple actions related to Board Member, Ebiye Udo-Udoma
His removal by the Athlete’s Advisory Council (AAC) and, in turn, his removal from the Board of Directors
The determination by the Judicial Committee that his removal was improper and his reinstatement to the Board
The determination by the Judicial Committe that decisions made in his absence were still valid
No mention whatsoever regarding the “sort of” merger between USA Team Handball and the US Handball Union? Or dissolution of the Union? (I’m still not sure what that was all about)
No mention whatsoever of Martin Branick’s removal from the CEO position and subsequent departure from the organization.
No mention whatsoever of Camille Nichol’s and Lawrence Taylor’s resignations from the Board of Directors
No mention whatsover of David Buckman’s resignation from the chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee
A Personal Breaking Point
As a pseudo-journalist and the de facto, unofficial lead for the “5 Percent” I’ll have to admit to some complacency in regards to all this. I had heard some rumors and had been told that it was a little messy, but I was somewhat resigned to the Board’s decisions.
And, then someone sent me Camille Nichol’s and David Buckman’s resignation letters. I don’t know either very well, but we’re all retired military and service academy graduates. Do not try and tell me that a retired 2 Star General and Colonel don’t know how to play in the sand box. That’s just silly and isn’t going to fly with me.
So, I reluctantly put on my investigative journalist hat and the more I found out, the more I was troubled by all that had happened and pretty upset with the secretive nature of it’s implementation.
Board Meeting Minutes (A Window of Transparency)
Board Meeting Minutes are often frustrating in that they usually tell only part of the story, but nevertheless they are typically the only source of official information as to what is taking place in terms of USA Team Handball matters. They’ve always been tucked away in a corner on the website and are typically quietly posted with no mention on the website or social media. Because of this I’ve gotten in the habit of periodically checking the USA website to see if any new minutes have been posted.
You might be “shocked” to learn that after former Board President Michael Wall’s resignation that Board Minutes were not posted for several months. And, that the availaiblity of video for the open portion of board meetings also quietly disappeared. As rumors that things were starting to get a “little messy” began popping up, I started to check the USA website more regularly and on 23 October I discovered that some Board Meeting Minutes had finally been posted. And, when they were later taken down I decided that it was time for a little sunshine so I posted them on the Team Handball News website. This then resulted in a request from the new CEO, Michael King to take some of them down due to their publishing via illegal behavior.
The Missing Minutes (What Changed?)
Here’s a table summarizing the Meeting Minutes in question:
There was no issue with 4 of the meeting minutes and these were left up on the Team Handball News website and posted on the USA Team Handball website (I’m not sure of the date, but I think it was in early November).
The minutes from the 10 July 2024 meeting have not been posted again by USA Team Handball. The stated purpose of the meeting was to afford US Handball Union leadership an opportunity to present its current situation and vision to members of the USATH board. They look like Meeting Minutes, but include this disclaimer on the bottom of each page: “Meeting minutes taken for the purpose of follow-up conversation – not intended for publication” I’m not sure why this is the case, but here’s one little interesting tidbit. The new, recently appointed USA Team Handball Independent Director, Andre Carter is listed in these minutes as part of the US Handball Union Leadership. That would seem to really stretch the definition of “independent” but, at this point why would anyone be surprised anymore.
The remaining 3 Meeting Minutes were eventually posted on the USA Team Handball website on 15 November, but not after undergoing some editing. This is concerning as it relates to the 8 August meeting minutes since they were formally approved by a Board motion at the 27 August meeting.
The nature of the changes fit broadly in to two categories:
Contractual dispute: Both the old and the new minutes discuss an ongoing contractual dispute. The old minutes mention the name of the company and provide more details. The new minutes omit the name of the company and are less specific in nature.
Naming of Board Members: The old minutes often used the first names of board members and indicated how board members voted on certain motions. The new minutes use last names and the record of how each board member voted has been replaced with a simple tally of the vote result.
In general, I’m fine with the changes that were made. In regards to the contractual dispute, the old minutes provided more detail than was necessary. Meeting minutes should also refer to people by their last names. For key votes of consequence it would certainly be preferable to know how Board Members voted, but I guess if there are privacy requirements that need to be followed it should be anonymous. I’m not sure what the requirments are exactly, but maybe a change to the bylaws is warranted to consider the possibility of making key votes public. I could be wrong, but it wouldn’t surprise me if most Board Members are totally comfortable with that. Finally, it goes without saying… don’t formally approve minutes and then change your mind. It’s bad form even if the reasons for changing said minutes are valid.
Red Herrings to Keep Info on the Down Low
I think most people are familiar with the concept of red herrings, which are intended to distract from what’s actually relevant. Contractual disputes and how people vote are of some interest, but they are pale in comparison to the wild “sequence of events” that had been taking place. A sequence of events that in it’s entirety could at best be described as unorthodox. And, at it’s worst described as Mickey Mouse dysfunctionality.
Maybe it’s possible to rationalize this “means” as absolutely necessary to getting to the desired “ends.” It seems like a real stretch, though, and it’s certainly a tough proposition to sell. So, if one can hide behind red herrings to keep the real story on the down low… well, that is very, very convenient. And, of course, that’s just for the Meeting Minutes. There was nothing preventing USA Team Handball from reporting more (actually anything) as to what had been going on. To deal with the uncomfortable explaining that comes with transparency.
But, doing so could very well have resulted in an early crash out of the sequence of events. Certainly, it would have made things very uncomfortable. Yes, for all intents and purposes secrecy seems to have become the chosen course of action. Because if all you care about is the end state, here’s the standard Machiavellian playbook to follow:
Keep all the bad information secret as long as possible. The fewer people that find out anything the better… because those people start asking questions and taking action
Minimize the amount of bad information that seeps out. If you can’t keep everything secret dribs and drabs of information are better than a total release. (Such a strategy didn’t work for Nixon, but it can work if the 80-15-5 rule applies.) If some people just know some of the story the notion of things being just a “little messy” is still sellable
Delay information release as long as possible. The more time that passes the better. This is especially true if everything can be normalized as quickly as possibly. Ideally it becomes a fait acompli where people might say, “WTF! That was really crazy, but everything seems OK now. I guess there’s no sense in rocking the boat.”
Is this what happened? Is what is still happening? Well, outward signs in terms of how information was mostly not shared the past few months mimics this playbook very closely. And, as the old saying goes if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck… It’s probably a duck.
